Grilled by the Watchtower - They asked about Ray Franz

by Amazing 16 Replies latest jw friends

  • Amazing
    Amazing

    Upcoming Postings: Okay folks, I have found some really good information, such as the Court rulings that I will post, and also the petition by the Society's attorneys to protect their Judicial Committees ... you can see first hand how they tried to save themselves. I will be posting this over the next few days.

    Notes:

    1. I will be blocking out names and locations in some cases as I feel the need.
    2. Mr. Schnack is the non-JW attorney from California who conducted the deposition on behalf of the Watchtower Society. he is also the attorney whose name you will see on the petitions to the courts as legal counsel for the Watchtower.
    3. In all cases I am the "Witness" and the one giving Answers.
    4. The names of former bethelites that I gave were individuals who had long ago left there, as those are the ones I recalled. So, no current names I knew at the time were given as I did not know any specific names other than what is openly published. But they were looking and digging, and I do not blame them for this, as they are trying to plug leaks.

    I found my Deposition from 2007: I have taken topical excerpts because they switch around and come back to topics. So, here is where they grilled me about Ray Franz:

    99

    18 Q. Have you met Raymond Franz face to

    19 face?

    20 A. Yes.

    21 Q. Where?

    22 A. At his home.

    23 Q. Where does he live?

    24 A. He lives in the State of xxxxxxxxxxx.

    100

    1 Q. And you were there 18 months ago?

    2 A. At his home 18 months ago, no.

    3 Q. Okay. I had understood you met him

    4 in his home. I misheard or misunderstood. I

    5 apologize.

    6 MR. LOVE: I think you asked him the

    7 last time he had communication with him.

    8 THE WITNESS: Yes.

    9 MR. SCHNACK: Okay.

    10 THE WITNESS: The communication was

    11 18 months ago. Then you asked have I ever

    12 met him face to face, but you didn't

    13 specify what time.

    14 MR. SCHNACK: Okay.

    15 THE WITNESS: And I just said yes.

    16 MR. SCHNACK: Okay. Well, I make

    17 assumptions sometimes.

    18 THE WITNESS: Okay.

    19 MR. SCHNACK: So I apologize.

    20 THE WITNESS: That's okay.

    21 MR. SCHNACK Q. When have you met

    22 Raymond Franz face to face?

    23 THE WITNESS A. In, that would be --

    24 it should have been in June of '93, I believe.

    101

    1 No, I don't recall if it was June of '93 or not,

    2 but it was somewhere between 1992 and 1993.

    3 Q. What were the circumstances?

    4 A. I took a business trip to xxxxxxxxxxxxx,

    5 and when the weekend arrived and my business

    6 activities were over I was scheduled to stay over

    7 a couple of days, so I drove to his home to meet

    8 with him.

    9 Q. What was the purpose of your driving

    10 to his home to meet with him?

    11 A. I wanted to meet with the man who

    12 wrote the book The Crisis of Conscience and his

    13 other book, In Search of Christian Freedom.

    14 I wanted to discuss those issues

    15 related to Jehovah's Witnesses with him.

    16 Q. Did you have those discussions?

    17 A. Yes.

    18 Q. Tell me the gist of the discussions.

    19 A. We discussed -- oh, my goodness -- a

    20 large number of items. I don't -- man, oh man, we

    21 discussed doctrine, both his views after leaving

    22 Jehovah's Witnesses as well as my views and a

    23 large number of things.

    24 I don't -- I don't know how to give

    102

    1 you the gist, because they were primarily just all

    2 over the board.

    3 Q. Have you met with him any other times

    4 face to face?

    5 A. Not face to face.

    6 Q. When is the last time you

    7 communicated with him? You said 18 months ago?

    8 A. About 18 months ago.

    9 Q. What was the purpose of that

    10 communication?

    11 A. To ask him a question.

    12 Q. To ask what?

    13 A. Ask him a question.

    14 Q. What was the question?

    15 A. The question was whether he supported

    16 Watchtower policy to wards child abusers and what

    17 his historical knowledge was of that issue.

    18 Q. How did he respond?

    19 A. His response is that he did not

    20 support the society's policy and that his

    21 historical knowledge was limited, because as a

    22 member of the Governing Body he just never dealt

    23 with that issue a great deal, to his recollection.

    24 Q. When was he on the Governing Body?

    103

    1 A. I believe up until 1980, and he --

    2 and if memory serves me correctly he said in his

    3 book nine years, so do the math, I guess.

    219
    23 Q. What is Bethel?
    24 A. Bethel? That's a term used for the

    220
    1 workers and their organization at the Watchtower
    2 Society in New York.
    3 Q. Have you ever served at Bethel?
    4 A. No.
    5 Q. Do you know anyone that has?
    6 A. Yes.
    7 Q. Who?
    8 A. Well, I believe xxxxxxxxxxxxx served
    9 there. I believe Tom Cabeen, who I mentioned
    10 earlier, served there.
    11 I believe xxxxxxxxxx served there. I
    12 mentioned him. Ray Franz, he served there. xxxxxx
    13 xxxxxxxxxx served there, and there are others I've
    14 met.
    15 I can't think of all their names.
    16 Q. Did your son-in-law serve there for a
    17 short time?
    18 A. Yes, he did.
    19 Q. What did he do?
    20 A. He worked at the Patterson
    21 Construction Project.
    22 Q. Anyone else that you can think of
    23 that served at Bethel?
    24 A. Some congregation members I knew in

    221
    1 the distant past. I'm trying to think. I can't
    2 recall.
    3 It's been so long, I can't recall all
    4 their names.
    5 Q. What was Cabeen's position at Bethel?
    6 A. I understood the term factory
    7 overseer, and since I did not serve there I don't
    8 know all the implications of that.
    9 Q. How about xxxxxxxxxxxx?
    10 A. I don't know what he did.
    11 Q. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxl?
    12 A. I understood he worked with -- more
    13 closely with the Governing Body in some kind of
    14 support staff.

    Yes, there is more to come and you will see first hand what things interested the Watchtower's legal team in defending themselves with respect to their responsibility in child abuse cases. - Stay tuned ...

  • OUTLAW
    OUTLAW

    Good stuff Jim..

    I await your next installment..

    ....................OUTLAW

  • leavingwt
    leavingwt

    Thank you for sharing this with us.

  • JeffT
    JeffT

    You mentioned something about the nonwitness attorney in the other thread. Was there any way to get a read on what he was thinking? He must have wondered at times what part of Kansas he was in. We'll never know, but I have to think he might have told somebody that they could try doing the right thing....

  • VM44
    VM44

    Hi Amazing,

    Very interesting. I am glad you posted this.

    One thing though, I do not think you need to black out the state in which Ray Franz lives.

    It is the same state where Commentary Press is located and that is public knowledge.

    --VM44

  • Amazing
    Amazing

    Hi VM44,

    Yes, I could have left Ray's home state on there ... but, I was just trying to be consistent. In a while I will post the portion of my deposition where I am grilled about the Internet. I think it will be more fascinating.

  • Farkel
    Farkel

    I note that they didn't ask you if "Jehovah" was the Editor of the Watchtower magazine, or not?

    I guess they left that one out!

    Farkel

  • mouthy
    mouthy

    Thanks Amazing ,,,good reading...

  • AllTimeJeff
    AllTimeJeff

    This has my attention! Thanks for posting it.

  • restrangled
    restrangled

    Amazing...thanks for posting all you have been through.

    As a former legal Secretary.....the fact that the society has fought this and used inside, and outside attorneys, tells it all.

    They felt guilty as charged and needed protection. They had attorney's that used the best tactics, including during your Deposition. Good for you for holding your own.

    What everyone is forgetting is not only the payout to the victims that is not available, but the cost of the attorneys, which from my experience would be approximately 45 to 50 percent of the settlement amount ....(thats on top of the final payout... not part of it)

    I won't even guess at the Millions$$$$ that were probably spent. (all donated dollars...a little at a time from very broke, poor witnesses assuming they were contributing to the world wide fund)

    r.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit