by metatron 17 Replies latest jw friends
After being in the watchtower for 32 years, i found out that very few read the articles published in the W-A.
Most offenders were the elders, too busy or no desire at all to read every article.
If adults were not reading how much more so among the youngs.
Watchtower is a fraud and only a few are seeing it.
It all depends. it's how it affects them.
.................Yes..................... ...OUTLAW
They are evil. Not only do they write up crap like this knowing it's all false to back up their other lies, but they force people to believe it without cross-referencing it (under threats of death and having their lives ruined). If they were just idiots, they would allow people to check it out using independent sources (and find out that they are wrong).
And they have to know that there is no such thing as a Divine Judgment Day (or that the outcomes have already been decided before people were born). Otherwise, why would they keep fxxxing with the Bible when they know what Revelation 22:18-19 tells them will happen to people that tamper with it?
According to the Insight book and a 1986 Awake article, C-14 dating is reliable for all dates SINCE the flood (2370 BCE or so). Supposedly the deluge changed the atmosphere so much, letting in a lot of extra radiation, etc., there's no way of knowing how much carbon was in the atmosphere prior to that event, so all C-14 dates purporting to be EARLIER than the flood are unreliable.
This flies in the face of all kinds of evidence, the biggest being that if there were such a sharp delineation between pre and post flood dating results, it would be easy to see and highly obvious to the scientific community. And, of course, this assumes there was a literal global flood, an occurrence for which there is ZERO evidence and, in fact, a boatload (no pun intended) of evidence to the contrary.
*** it-1 p. 155 Archaeology ***
It is true that the radiocarbon clock has been employed, along with other modern methods, for dating the artifacts found. However, that this method is not completely accurate is evidenced in the following statement by G. Ernest Wright in The Biblical Archaeologist (1955, p. 46): “It may be noted that the new Carbon 14 method of dating ancient remains has not turned out to be as free from error as had been hoped. . . . Certain runs have produced obviously wrong results, probably for a number of reasons. At the moment, one can depend upon the results without question only when several runs have been made which give virtually identical results and when the date seems correct from other methods of computation [italics ours].” More recently, The New Encyclopaedia Britannica (Macropaedia, 1976, Vol. 5, p. 508) stated: “Whatever the cause, . . . it is clear that carbon-14 dates lack the accuracy that traditional historians would like to have.”—See CHRONOLOGY (Archaeological Dating).
*** it-1 p. 610 Deluge ***
Effect on the Earth. With the Deluge great changes came, for example, the life span of humans dropped very rapidly. Some have suggested that prior to the Flood the waters above the expanse shielded out some of the harmful radiation and that, with the waters gone, cosmic radiation genetically harmful to man increased. However, the Bible is silent on the matter. Incidentally, any change in radiation would have altered the rate of formation of radioactive carbon-14 to such an extent as to invalidate all radiocarbon dates prior to the Flood.
With the sudden opening of the ‘springs of the watery deep’ and “the floodgates of the heavens,” untold billions of tons of water deluged the earth. (Ge 7:11) This may have caused tremendous changes in earth’s surface. The earth’s crust is relatively thin (estimated at between 30 km [20 mi] and 160 km [100 mi] thick), stretched over a rather plastic mass thousands of kilometers in diameter. Hence, under the added weight of the water, there was likely a great shifting in the crust. In time new mountains evidently were thrust upward, old mountains rose to new heights, shallow sea basins were deepened, and new shorelines were established, with the result that now about 70 percent of the surface is covered with water. This shifting in the earth’s crust may account for many geologic phenomena, such as the raising of old coastlines to new heights. It has been estimated by some that water pressures alone were equal to “2 tons per square inch,” sufficient to fossilize fauna and flora quickly.—See The Biblical Flood and the Ice Epoch, by D. Patten, 1966, p. 62.
*** g86 9/22 pp. 22-23 The Radiocarbon Clock ***
The most serious fault in radiocarbon-dating theory is in the assumption that the level of carbon 14 in the atmosphere has always been the same as it is now. That level depends, in the first instance, on the rate at which it is produced by cosmic rays. Cosmic rays vary greatly in intensity at times, being largely affected by changes in the earth’s magnetic field. Magnetic storms on the sun sometimes increase the cosmic rays a thousandfold for a few hours. The earth’s magnetic field has been both stronger and weaker in past millenniums. And since the explosion of nuclear bombs, the worldwide level of carbon 14 has increased substantially.
On the other hand, the proportion is affected by the quantity of stable carbon in the air. Great volcanic eruptions add measurably to the stable carbon-dioxide reservoir, thus diluting the radiocarbon. In the past century, man’s burning of fossil fuels, especially coal and oil, at an unprecedented rate has permanently increased the quantity of atmospheric carbon dioxide. (More details on these and other uncertainties in the carbon-14 clock were given in the April 8, 1972, issue of Awake!)
*** g81 11/22 p. 15 How Old Are the Fossils? ***
Since we have no way of knowing how intense cosmic rays were in past ages, we are wise to accept carbon-14 dates only for the period for which the clock has been calibrated with historical materials, back to about 3,500 years ago. Older than that, they may be increasingly inaccurate.
*** g72 4/8 pp. 18-19 Scientific or Bible Chronology—Which Merits Your Faith? ***
If the evolutionists’ ideas about man’s having been around for a million years were correct, surely we would expect to find a much larger number of artifacts dated back 10,000 or 20,000 years, within the range of carbon 14. Why do nearly all the specimens fall within just the past 6,000 years? We do not expect a scientific measurement to speak with the authority of a trusted eyewitness. It can only offer circumstantial evidence. But statistically speaking, the radiocarbon clock throws the weight of its testimony overwhelmingly on the side of the creation account, and against the evolution hypothesis, of man’s origin.
According to the Insight book and a 1986 Awake article, C-14 dating is reliable for all dates SINCE the flood (2370 BCE or so).
There is also the matter of that pesky post-flood Egyptian civilization. Not only do many Egyptian stone tools back to 5500 BCE or earlier - but Egypt has a written history going back to 3300 BCE - that's right, a written record starting 1000 years before the wt flood.
So apparently durring the -3130 years between the flood of 2370 BC, and the early stone tools of 5500 BC, Noah got off the arc, some of his family traveled back into time, so that they could provide Egypt with stone tools and the hundreds of thousands of slaves needed to build the Step Pyramid in 2750 BC (also pre-dating the wt flood).
The entire Egyptian civilization is all supposed to be all post-flood mind you.. so there's no radical change in 'atmospheric radiation' to blame here... (Note also that modern archaeologists employ several dating methods, not just C-14. Each dating method has a specific range and accuracy, but by combining techniques they have been able to increase accuracy. They would have certainly noticed if atmospheric changes were causing C-14 to deviate significantly from values deduced using other methods... infact, they have detected such deviations and they adjust for them.)
- Lime
I think they are definately frauds, they know what they are writing is Bull-cacca, I think they are slightly moronic with a touch of arrogance because they know none of the R&F will call them on their nonsense. They think they can fool the public too.
There is no way they are innocent, or sincere. Bunch of arse-h**es !
Love
Wobble
