Did all disfellowshipping begin in 1952?

by middleman 17 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • Nathan Natas
    Nathan Natas

    The WATCHTOWER, May 15, 1944, page 155:

    self-condemned." (Titus 3 : 10, Weymouth) The servant acting for the Theocratic organization would give no assignments of service to such disturber of unity. To the church at Thessalonica Paul wrote: "And if any man obey not our word by this epistle, note that man, and have no company with him, that he may be ashamed. Yet count him not as an enemy, but admonish him as a brother." (2 Thess. 3: 14, 15) One refusing to obey organization instructions, as represented by the apostle’s epistles, should not be followed or imitated by others of the congregation, but should be helped to see the error of his way.
    If he falls into causing divisions in the congregation, then the Theocratic organization must step in through its authorized servants.

  • Nathan Natas
    Nathan Natas

    That's the end of the section discussing disfellowshiping from the article UNITY FOR THE NEW WORLD that appeared in the WATCHTOWER of May 15, 1944.

    I will add the other articles later today.

  • Nathan Natas
    Nathan Natas

    The WATCHTOWER, March 1, 1946, pages 75 - 77, "LET US KEEP THE FEAST"

    KEEPING THE FEAST NOW
    31 From the above description of the first celebration of the feast, and from what the apostle Paul says in connection with it at I Corinthians, chapter 5, how is the typical feast of unleavened bread fulfilled by Christ’s followers ? It is fulfilled by the way they Live their lives after accepting him as their passover Lamb and thereby gaining deliverance from this world and its sin and condemned state. How the apostle came to refer to that typical feast and its present fulfillment was this way: One of the members of the Christian congregation at Corinth was reported to him to have committed a gross sin. This professing Christian, be he converted Jew or Gentile, had taken his own father’s wife and committed impurity with her. She was at least his stepmother; and from the apostle’s statement at 2 Corinthians 7:12 some think that his father, against whom this wrong was committed by this son, was still alive. Such a practice was contrary to the will of Jehovah God as expressed in his dealings with the Israelites. His law, which was a shadow of a right course of action now, said: "The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover : it is thy father’s nakedness." --Lev. 18:8.

    32 Long before that law was given, Jacob’s firstborn son Reuben committed adultery with his father’s concubine, Bilhah, the handmaid of his father’s beloved wife Rachel. For this reason God took from Reuben the firstborn son’s birthright. He also inspired Jacob on his deathbed to pronounce words of disapproval upon Reuben. (Gen. 35:22; 49:1-4; 1 Chron. 5:1) After the above law of Leviticus 18:8 was given, Absalom purposely broke it for political reasons and upon advice of King David’s traitorous counselor Ahithophel. Absalom turned rebel against his father, King David, and caused him to flee from his palace in Jerusalem. Then, to show that he had taken over the entire establishment of his ousted father, Absalom took King David’s concubines and openly committed adultery with them. (2 Sam. 16: 20-23) Absalom died a violent death amid battle defeat. After King David’s death, his ambitious son Adonijah tried to get compensation for being barred from succeeding to David’s throne. He asked for his father’s concubine Abishag. For this presumptuousness King Solomon had Adonijah put to death.--1 Ki. 1:1-5; 2:13-25.

    33 Thus the practice of taking a stepmother for sex relations, whether her husband was alive or dead, was definitely condemned in God’s Word. However, the congregation at Corinth was not concerned about such a thing’s being committed in their midst, which even the pagan outsiders condemned. They were so taken up with contentions over men as teachers and leaders, such as Cephas (Peter), Paul, and Apollos, that they had no time for cleansing the congregation from the defiling presence of this base sinner. They put on airs, thinking that by having had one man as an instructor as against another instructor, it made
    them differ from other brethren; and so they were puffed up and put on airs. (1 Cor. 1:11-13; 4:5, 6) Hence the apostle wrote to them as follows, in order that the spirit of the Lord God might be saved and preserved within that congregation:

    34 "It is actually reported that there is fornication among you, and such fornication as is not even among the Gentiles, that one of you hath his father’s wife. And ye are puffed up, and did not rather mourn, that he that had done this deed might be taken away from among you. For I verily, being absent in body but present in spirit, have already as though I were present judged him that hath so wrought this thing." What judgment did the apostle render on the matter? "In the name of our Lord Jesus, ye being gathered together, and my spirit, with the power of our Lord Jesus, to deliver such one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus. Your glorying is not good [that is, This is no matter to boast of]. Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump? [Hence the danger to the spirit of the Lord within this congregation.] Purge out the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, even as ye are unleavened. For our passover also hath been sacrificed, even Christ: wherefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth."--1 Cor. 5:1-8, Am. Stan. Ver.

    35 In the ancient feast of unleavened bread the first day and the seventh day were observed by a holy convocation and laying off from works for personal gain. And for the congregation at Corinth, and for any Christian congregation and the men of goodwill
    among them now, to observe the antitypical feast of unleavened bread, they must cleanse from their midst anyone who is active among them like a lump of leaven in a batch of dough. He must be "out off".

    36 Since the death and resurrection of the Lamb of God, A.D. 33, the Christian believers have been entering into the obligations of the antitypical feast of unleavened bread. But more so from A.D. 1918 is this true, because in that year the prophecy (Malachi 3:1-4) underwent fulfillment that Jehovah’s Messenger, Christ Jesus, should come to the temple and cleanse it. In fulfillment of his own prophecy, at Matthew 24: 48-51, concerning this end of the world, Christ Jesus at the temple has cleansed iris faithful remnant of followers from the presence and influence and power of the "evil servant" class. This is particularly so since A.D. 1932, in which year "elective elders" as a class disappeared from among Jehovah’s witnesses. And just as the feast of unleavened bread began first after the passover and after the ten plagues had been poured out upon ancient Egypt, likewise by 1932 the modern counterpart of the ten plagues had taken place against "Christendom". This was by God’s "strange work" through his holy angels and also by the preaching done by his active witnesses on the earth. By these antitypical plagues the power and control of this world and its "firstborn" has been smitten and killed so far as affecting Jehovah’s faithful remnant and their companions of good-will.--See extensive explanation in the book Jehovah, pages 55-99; also The Watchtower of February 15, 1944, pages 58, 59.

    37 Therefore, whether as a Christian congregation or as individual Christians and witnesses of Jehovah, we must lead clean lives. Remember that Christ Jesus, when instituting the Memorial supper, used the loaf of unleavened bread to represent his church, which is his body, saying: "Take, eat; this is my body." (Matt. 26 : 26; 1 Cor. 11 : 23, 24) Only by thus
    keeping pure can the remnant of Christ’s body members have a part in the antitype of the feast of unleavened bread. The unleavened state of the bread signifies purity. The Israelites began eating this bread when parting company with oppressive Egypt and its servitude to Satan’s visible organization. Like those ancient Israelites, so Jehovah’s consecrated people must now be clean from the leaven of this world. Its leaven represents its teachings, its habits, its standards, and its practices. It represents religion, as is shown by Jesus’ warning concerning the leaders who were devotees of "the Jews’ religion". He said: "Beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees." "Then understood they that he bade them not beware of the leaven of bread, but of the teaching of the Pharisees and Sadducees." (Matt. 16: 6, 12, Am. Stan. Ver.) Being an unleavened lump or a fresh lump of dough symbolizes that we must be no part of this world and not have any of it among us. The leaven of this world can have no part with the "Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world".

    38 We cannot avoid having contact or material dealings with those of this world. To do so altogether, we should be obliged to get off this planet. So says the apostle, at 1 Corinthians 5: 9-11. But we can watch to do what the apostle says, namely, not to seek their association and company, and "not to keep company, if any man that is named a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner ; with such a one no, not to eat". (1 Cor. 5 : 11, Am. Stan. Ver.) We cannot help being in the world, and Jesus pointedly said he did not pray God to take his followers out of this world before the battle of Armageddon. But while necessarily in the world, we can be as Jesus was, namely, "not of the world." (John 17:14-16) The world is outside of Jehovah’s Theocratic organization. Although we deliver a testimony against it and publicly foretell its fate as predicted by God’s Word, we must let this world run and regulate its own organization and affairs and go its depraved way. Those of God’s organization must look conscientiously to their personal inward affairs and to the things within Jehovah’s organization. As the apostle wrote the Corinthian congregation: "Outsiders it is no business of mine to judge. No, you must judge
    those who are inside the church, for yourselves; as for outsiders, God will judge them. Expel the wicked from your company."--1 Cor. 5:12, 13, Moffatt; see also Deuteronomy 17 :7; 19:19.

    39 Keeping the feast, then, during this postwar era means conducting ourselves as God’s servants and witnesses without spot from this world; "not with the old leaven [of religion either of Jewry or of Christendom’], neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened bread of sincerity [purity, innocence] and truth." (1 Cot. 5 : 8) Eating
    leavened bread was punished by the eater’s being cut off; hence those of God’s organization must avoid defilement by the symbolical leaven. The leaven of malice and wickedness would include not only the things the apostle directly names, fornication, covetousness, idolatry, railing, drunkenness, extortion, etc., but also meddling in this modern world’s affairs, giving moral or other support to its proud, God-defying schemes for a world-government of this planet and for "creating a better and finer world" independent of God’s way and kingdom. Jesus’ urgent advice is that we flee to the mountains of God’s kingdom at the sight of such a worldly "abomination of desolation".-- Matt. 24:15-20.

    40 The unleavened bread Jehovah God called "the bread of affliction". We may be sure, then, that as we celebrate this feast, eating this bread by keeping disconnected, unspotted and free from this postwar world and by preaching the Kingdom truth, we shall suffer great affliction from Satan and his demons and from his visible organization of politics, commerce and militarism, and organized religion. We can no more stop the pursuit of us by these persecutors than the Israelites could halt the Egyptian hordes at their heels. But despite all the bread of affliction we eat, WE ARE FREE of antitypical Egypt; we are Jehovah’s freedmen by Christ Jesus. Under their leadership and protection, we are celebrating the feast of holy freedom as we march forward to the New World of righteousness, singing their high praises and calling upon all peoples of all nations to be glad with us and to join us in the march. The Red sea of Armageddon just ahead will not stop us. It will stop our persecuting pursuers dead in their tracks, not so much as one of them remaining. Then, Armageddon past, we shall sing Jehovah’s praises by Christ Jesus everlastingly in the New World of absolute liberty of all servants of God.

  • Nathan Natas
    Nathan Natas

    The WATCHTOWER, April 15, 1947, pages 122, 123, "DIVINE MERCY AND FORGIVENESS"

    31 Likewise there may have been some men or women divorced from former marriage mates according to the law of the land but not according to the Scriptural grounds for divorce; and these may have remarried before getting the knowledge of the Kingdom truth and consecrating themselves to God through Christ. Some such may have been included among the Corinthians, because Paul tells them bluntly that some of them were fornicators, adulterers, abusers of themselves with mankind and sensually effeminate. Evidently, then, such persons had to proceed as Christians according to the legal standing when the truth found them. The law of the land declared the former marriage annulled and pronounced the second marriage proper and valid and recognized them in this latter marriage as man and wife. Also the law of the land did not require them to dissolve this latter marriage. As for what they did ignorantly before coming into the truth and consecrating, that was covered by the blood of Jesus Christ and thenceforth they must follow God’s law.

    32 God’s servant Paul was not alone showing how marvelous God’s mercy is. There was another powerful reason for him to call attention to the fact that onetime fornicators, idolaters, adulterers, thieves, covetous, drunkards, etc., were now washed, sanctified, justified and given the Lord’s spirit. What was this hard-hitting reason? It was this, that they should not return to such things and try to impose upon God’s forbearance and merciful goodness. If they did, then they would be fully responsible fornicators, idolaters, sensual effeminates, sodomites, etc., not excusable for ignorance. Paul therefore says: "Know ye not that your bodies are the members of Christ? shall I then take the members of Christ, and make them the members of an harlot? GOD FORBID! What? know ye not that he which is joined to an harlot is one body? for two, saith he, shall be one flesh. But he that is joined unto the Lord is one spirit. Flee fornication. Every [other] sin that a man doeth is without the body [or, outside his body]; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body," by tying his body to a sinner and malting himself one flesh with such sinner.--1 Cor. 6:15-18.

    33 What becomes very manifest from Paul’s argument is this : The purpose of God’s extending mercy to persons who were ignorantly guilty of specific sins before being reproved by the truth brought to them is not that they could continue repeating such sins in intentional self-indulgence and think God’s mercy easily available for relief. Not at all! God's mercy is an incentive to righteousness, a spur to an honest endeavor to live above sin and free from its service. His mercy is given in order to put the consecrated person on his integrity thenceforth, and such integrity he must keep by not returning to the filth and service of sin, like the sow that goes back to wallowing in the mire or the dog that laps up its own vomit. The issue of integrity is set before the receiver of God’s loving compassion. He now has the opportunity to vindicate God’s dealings with him. How? By proving the Devil a liar in saying that God cannot by his mercy lift humankind out of sin and have them ever thereafter hold fast to his righteousness.

    34 For that reason Paul called upon the Corinthian church to purge out the fornicator that did not appreciate this point. This man committed fornication with the Wife of his own father, and now Paul called upon the church to uphold and safeguard its own integrity by putting this offensive, spiritually dangerous person from their midst. His conduct was not the fruit of God’s spirit, and the church must seek to preserve the spirit of the Lord within it by ’putting away from among themselves that wicked person’ and ’keeping no company with him’.--1 Cor.5:1-13.

    35 This action, it appears, had a wholesome effect upon the professed Christian guilty of this vile conduct. It brought him to his senses. It made him realize keenly the enormity of his sin and the greatness of the grievance he had committed against the good name of God and of Christ and against the purity of God’s organization under Christ. It also made the congregation rally to the cause of God’s righteousness and thus clear itself of any appearance of conniving at the man’s fornication and indifferently approving of it. If this man is the one Paul referred to at 2 Corinthians 2: 1-11, then he repented and turned with great grief to Jehovah God for mercy through Christ. Then Paul, who had himself tasted of unspeakable mercy from God, exhibited mercy to this repentant and disfellowshiped man. He called upon the Corinthian congregation, all of whom had become Christians through God’s mercy, to show mercy to the repentant man and welcome him back reformed to their midst. "For that individual, this censure by the majority of you is punishment enough, and so you must now turn around and forgive and comfort him, or he may be overwhelmed by his remorse. So I beg you to restore him to his place "in your affections. For that is why I wrote you--to find out how you would stand the test, and see if you would obey me absolutely. When you forgive a man, I forgive him too. For anything I had to forgive has been forgiven on your account, and as in the very presence of Christ, to keep Satan from
    getting the better of us. For we know what he is after." -An Amer. Trans.

  • Nathan Natas
    Nathan Natas

    The WATCHTOWER, August 1, 1949, page 240, "LETTER ON POLYGAMY"

    LETTER

    "ON POLYGAMY"

    May 2, 1949

    Dear Brother:

    Your letter of March 26 has had our thoughtful attention.

    Our Circular of instructions advised Brother _____ that no polygamist could be rejected from meetings. That is, they could not be prevented from coming inside the Kingdom Hall and being personally present at meetings. They have as much right to do this as any stranger, whose social or marital position we do not know. But as for taking part in the meetings, that is a different matter. If Brother _____ or his fellow servants have prevented you from entering the Hall and being present at meetings in an orderly way, then they have exceeded the intent of the statement in our Circular. But if they refuse to recognize dissidents with any
    active part in the meetings and joint participation in the company field activities, then they are holding true to the sense of the Circular instructions.

    You reason that if monogamy was the known and recognized standard among the apostolic Christians, then there would be no point in Paul’s instructing that the overseer and the ministerial assistant in a company must be, if married, the husband of only one wife. By some, however, this is understood to mean that such company servants must have married only once, not being remarried after divorce or after being a widower by loss of a former wife. This thought is drawn from Paul’s instruction that those 60-year-old widows should be put upon the list of those getting company support who have "been the wife of one
    man". (I Tim. 5: 9) Certainly polygamy on the part women was not a permitted custom among those primitive Christians. Yet, to follow your reasoning, if monogamy was the accepted standard among them, there would be no point in Paul’s making that requirement concerning widows. Since the company servants were commanded to be examples to the flock, then their standard of monogamy would be the standard of all the flock over whom they were the Lord’s undershepherds.--1 Pet. 5: 3.

    What Jesus said at Matthew 5: 31, 32 and 19:1-12 was not only against divorcing a woman for causes other than marital unfaithfulness. It was also against polygamy. When he said he was against divorce except for the one cause, because "from the beginning it was not so", then he was likewise against polygamy. Why? For "from the beginning it was not so", but God provided Adam with only one wife.

    The Society did indeed say that it was not a command on our part for the polygamists to put away their excess wives. We do not attempt to dictate in the lives of any who profess to be Christians, but we must allow them the privileges of doing what they want to do. We will not force them. If they want to please the Lord God, we will not have to command them. They will be pleased to obey God of their own accord. But we do have the right to demand that those whom the Society recognizes as its representatives shall meet the qualifications set by the Lord God. Faithfulness to Him obliges us to do this.

    In this matter we cannot be biased or influenced or guided by social standards in Africa or in America or anywhere else. We could not have a standard for Africa and another for America and still another for some other country. If we yield to polygamy in Africa and wink at it, then brethren over here in America could say, "Well, you allow polygamy over in Africa, and to be consistent you should allow it over here in America. The only thing not allowing for it here in America is that States laws are against polygamy; but why should the Society object if we do it secretly without the knowledge of the law?" No, but we must have one standard for all the earth and for all countries on the earth. And that is the Lo;d’s set of requirements which apply equally and alike to all Christians of every race, color, or language. Only in this way do we keep from being double-minded and thus unstable in all our ways. (Jas. 1:8) Only by following the straight and narrow path can we be true to our God.

    We appreciate all the work that you have put in in the field in years gone by. Certainly it would be a shame for you to lose all the spiritual treasure that this course has piled up for you. For this reason we think John’s admonition most appropriate: "Look to yourselves, that we lose not those things which we have wrought, but that we receive a full reward. Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. lie that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son." (2 John 8, 9) So, when you see other brethren lining up with the doctrine of Christ, why can’t you do so also in the interest of peace? Instead of resisting, why not rest in the Lord God and show his spirit? It will make the right course ever so much easier for you, and will lead to your receiving a "full reward".

    Faithfully yours in ’praising him yet more and more’,

    WATCH TOWER BIBLE AND TRACT SOCIETY

  • Nathan Natas
    Nathan Natas

    The WATCHTOWER, April 15, 1951, page 240, “LET MARRIAGE BE HONORABLE AMONG ALL”

    IN BEHALF OF IDEAL MARRIAGE

    22 The Most High God will now have a clean visible theocratic organization. He will see to it therefore that now since his coming to the temple it is kept clean from immorality and other reproachful things. A person guilty of immorality may claim he has a right to mix in with the organization and may protest against being disfellowshiped. He protests and argues that by having access freely to the organization he will be helped to overcome his immoral relations with one of the opposite sex and thus be saved from the evil consequences of his course. But God’s Word orders the disfellowshiping of such immoral person as an expression of His judgment against him. Unless the guilty one repents and straightens out his life, he may not be forgiven and taken back into the society of the theocratic organization. But another immoral person may be defiant and say: ‘Go ahead and disfellowship me if you want to. I have an individual relationship with God. So I should worry.’ But such a person deceives himself, for God judges adulterers and fornicators with condemnation and has no relations with them. That is why he forbids his organization to have relations with them.

    23 God’s organization is more important to him than the salvation of an immoral or disobedient creature. The vindication of Jehovah’s sovereignty and the keeping his name above reproach is of higher importance than the preservation of willful sinners. Hence these paramount things must come first. Accordingly God shows due respect for the organization which bears his name. He executes his judgments against the defilers and keeps it clean. He acts on the principle: “If anyone destroys the temple of God, God will destroy him; for the temple of God is holy, which temple you people are.”—1 Cor. 3:17, NW.

    24 Since God so respects his organization, then we must exercise fear and must respect it too. It is our solemn obligation to watch our conduct and avoid bringing reproach upon it or corrupting it. For one thing, therefore, keep marriage honorable and the marriage bed undefiled. We may not defile or bring reproach upon the organization by impure conduct and stay in the organization, for this would act like a yeast and tend to ferment the entire organization with uncleanness, hypocrisy and sin. It would make the organization odious in the eyes of sincere people and would prevent these offended ones from coming to the organization and being saved. We cannot consistently gain our own salvation and at the same time hinder others from doing so because of our immoral, reproachful behavior which involves God’s organization. So the judgment which God is executing today is: “Remove the wicked man [who is like a yeast of sin] from among yourselves.” (1 Cor. 5:1-13, NW) If we disown God by our conduct, he will disown us by disfellowshiping us. His judgment today is not moving slowly, and the destruction of the unclean is not slumbering.

    25 We are now at the threshold of the righteous new world. Concerning those who enter into the divine government of that new world it is written: “Anything not sacred and anyone that carries on a disgusting thing and a lie will in no way enter into it.” (Rev. 21:27, NW) Jehovah God is now building a new world society, and it must measure up to the clean, righteous standards that will prevail in his new world. Only those who strive to measure up to them will he carry through the “war of the great day of God the Almighty” which he fights against this unclean world, and they will live into the clean post-Armageddon world. There will be no polygamy sanctioned then in order to carry out the divine mandate to “fill the earth” with a righteous race. No immorality of any kind will be permitted, and there will be no divorce between those who share in fulfilling the divine mandate. As the flood of Noah’s day wiped out the immoral standards and practices of the antediluvian world, so the great tide of Armageddon will wash away the moral corruption of this world.

    26 So may we see our duty now to “put up a hard fight for the faith that was once for all time delivered to the holy ones” and do so by resisting all infiltration of immorality, unchastity and worldliness into the theocratic organization by persons today like Balaam and Jezebel. In this behalf the rule for us is, “Let marriage be honorable among all, and the marriage bed be without defilement.” Husbands and wives will harmonize with this divine rule. They will endeavor to honor their marriage by dignifying it according to the ideal standards which God’s Word sets for it.—Eph. 5:21-33, NW.

  • Nathan Natas
    Nathan Natas

    Villabolo asked,

    Are they still disfellowshipping for joining the YMCA?

    Questions from Readers

    • Is it true that for religious reasons Jehovah's Witnesses may not become members of the YMCA (Young Men's Christian Association)?

    Yes, that is so. We have long recognized that the YMCA, though not being a church as such, is definitely aligned with the religious organizations of Christendom in efforts to promote interfaith.

    In September 1885 the Watch Tower took this position:

    "Alas for the Bible-rearing practiced in the Y. M. C. Associations! They are completely under the control of the sectarians, by whom they are supported. Though professedly non-sectarian, professedly controlled by no creed but the Bible, they are more creed-bound than others, since they are bound by all the popular creeds."-P. 6.

    Later the underlying religious purpose and interfaith efforts of the YMCA were mentioned in the September 1964 issue of Kingdom Ministry, used by Jehovah's Witnesses in one of their meetings.

    Many persons think of the "Y" simply as a social organization that offers various services, such as a swimming pool, facilities for athletic training and a place for clubs to meet. Commendable as some of these provisions may be, it is important to bear in mind that the YMCA was founded with a distinctly religious basis. This was set out at a World Alliance in Paris in 1855. The main part of that official statement (called the Paris Basis) reads:

    "The Young Men's Christian Associations seek to unite those young men, who, regarding Jesus Christ as their God and Saviour, according to the Holy Scriptures, desire to be His disciples in their faith and in their life, and to associate their efforts for the extension of His Kingdom amongst young men." (Italics added)

    While in some countries churches may not be the YMCA's main source of revenue and while membership is open to persons of all races, nationalities and religions, the fundamental religious objectives of the "Y" cannot be ignored.

    ‘But,' some may sincerely wonder, ‘is religion or interfaith really an aspect of the YMCA?' The answer must be "Yes." Though religious features may be de-emphasized in some branches of the YMCA, all local "Ys" are still expected to comply with the Paris Basis. Further, note comments from the 1975 YMCA publication Christian and Open:

    Anza A. Lema, associate of the executive committee of the World Alliance of YMCAs, wrote:

    "From its very foundation, it has always looked to the Bible for inspiration and guidance. In many ways its role in the world has tended to complement that of the church without claiming to be a congregation itself. . . .

    "But it is more than just an instrument through which Christians put their moral ideals and teachings into practice as they serve society. Most supporters of the YMCA look at it as a place where real fellowship with one another through Jesus Christ is experienced. . . .

    "In humbling itself and trying to relate its structures and services more directly to the community, it will be carrying out more effectively its role of service and priesthood for its neighbours. . . . "

    Matthias Dannenmann, general secretary, National Council of YMCAs of Germany, said:

    "From its very beginning the YMCA was no doubt meant to have only Christians as members and on the other hand there was the missionary obligation towards those members who could not yet profess Jesus Christ. . . .

    "The YMCA is a big offer, but only in as far as Jesus Christ is working in it as Living Saviour. We should do our very best not to drive out this Lord but as we carry him in our name we should personally use every chance of meeting him in the YMCA and of continuously extending this possibility to other people."

    Officials of the organization have pointed out that they feel that more attention needs to be given to the religious orientation of the YMCA. Dr. Paul M. Limbert, from 1952-1962 secretary-general of the YMCA's World Alliance in Geneva, Switzerland, wrote:

    "It may readily be granted that too few Y.M.C.A.s take full advantage of the opportunity for ecumenical education inherent in these informal contacts among Christians . . .

    "When questions about different forms and beliefs arise among young people and adults, the wise leader takes advantage of the occasion to guide discussion from superficial argument to deeper dialogue. . . .

    Leaders in both churches and Y.M.C.A.s need to recognize more clearly the essential nature of a lay ecumenical Christian movement. A Young Men's Christian Association is not a church nor a substitute for a church. . . . Yet the Faith and Order commission of the British Council of Churches declared in a carefully worded statement in 1959 that the Christian Associations are ‘valuable auxiliaries' of the churches, organs of their own missionary activity."-The Christian Century, June 10, 1964.

    And The Christian Century of August 29, 1969, in its article "Happy Birthday, Y.M.C.A.!", stated:

    "Realizing that the Christian identity of the ‘Y' has often been drowned in swimming pools, its leaders are engaged in recovery of theological awareness and ecumenical vigor. . . . It may be that the greatest challenge to the Y.M.C.A. is to reclaim its religious heritage for the robust assertion of a new ecumenism among laymen in local communities. The Y.M.C.A. just might be able to do things for the Christian churches which, in their parochial rigidities, they seem unable to do for themselves."

    Consequently, there is ample evidence that the YMCA originated with religious objectives and continues to have such to this day.

    In joining the YMCA as a member a person accepts or endorses the general objectives and principles of the organization. He is not simply paying for something he receives, such as when buying things being sold to the public at a store. (Compare 1 Corinthians 8:10; 10:25.) Nor is his membership merely an entry pass, as when a person buys a theater ticket. Membership means that one has become an integral part of this organization founded with definite religious objectives, including the promotion of interfaith. Hence, for one of Jehovah's Witnesses to become a member of such a so-called "Christian" association would amount to apostasy.

    Some individuals have on occasion not become members but have paid a onetime admission fee, viewing this as simply paying for a commercial service available. Even in this regard it is wise to consider whether this course will adversely affect the consciences of others.-1 Cor. 8:11-13.

    Jehovah's Witnesses, of course, appreciate a balanced amount of healthful exercise. The Bible says that "bodily training is beneficial for a little." Yet it adds that "godly devotion is beneficial for all things." (1 Tim. 4:8) That does not mean devotion to a triune God. The Bible does not teach that Jesus is "God" in a trinity, as is taught in many of Christendom's churches and as is still included in the "Paris Basis" of the YMCA.-1 Cor. 11:3; John 17:3.

    While interfaith efforts and ecumenism are popular today, they are not upheld by the true God, who told his servants: "Do not become unevenly yoked with unbelievers. . . . ‘Therefore get out from among them, and separate yourselves.'" (2 Cor. 6:14-17) Also, Jesus plainly said that the Almighty must be worshiped "with spirit and truth." (John 4:24) Most definitely that does not mean joining in a religious cause with persons holding beliefs contrary to what the Scriptures teach. (Rev. 18:4, 5) Thus, it is because of their understanding of what God expects of true worshipers, and of what the purposes and direction of the YMCA are, that Jehovah's Witnesses may not become members of that organization.

    Further, it is well to give thought to the fact that in virtually all the years of the YMCA's existence, it has not acted in harmony with the spirit of Isaiah 2:2-4, as can be noted from the following historical facts:

    "YMCA services to the armed forces began, in the United States, with the Civil War, and it continued giving service through all wars thereafter."-Encyclopædia Britannica, Micropædia, Vol. X, p. 835, 1976 ed.

    "In the Civil War, only ten years after its beginning in Boston, and before there were buildings or secretaries or financial resources, a total of 4,859 ‘delegates' were recruited and deployed and over six millions of donated funds used for the temporal and spiritual needs of soldiers. . . . In World War I, the American Y.M.C.A. assumed an enormous responsibility for service at home and abroad for which a staff of 25,926 was required with expenditures of more than 167 million dollars. In World War II, the Y.M.C.A. became one of the organizations that founded the United Service Organizations [USO], joining as a group of private religious organizations from Protestant, Catholic, and Jewish faiths in an agreement with the Federal government to provide civilian recreational, welfare, and religious services to men in uniform and to war-production workers in communities adjacent to military establishments."-The New Funk & Wagnalls Encyclopedia, Vol. 36, pp. 13,467, 13,468, 1952 ed.

    "YMCA activities for members of the armed forces began during the Civil War (1861-1865). These services increased with each later war and reached their fullest development during World War II (1939-1945). The YMCA maintained more than 450 clubs for the Allied armed forces."-The World Book Encyclopedia, Vol. 21, p. 477, 1978 ed.

    This kind of service under the name "Christian" was certainly not in fulfillment of Micah 4:3.

    What ultimately decides whether or not a person gets disfellowshiped is not what they have done, but how submissive and "repentant" they are of behavior that the WTB&TS condemns. So a person might not be disfellowshiped for joining the YMCA if he resigns after being warned that such egregious behavior is not for True Christians. But it's OK for the WTB&TS to join the UN, because they maek the rules.

  • jwfacts
    jwfacts

    They did remove fellowship from wrongdoers prior to 1952, however the practice was a lot more lenient, and not before a body of elders but by the congregation. They did not shun as strictly either.

    "According to this Scripture the very most that the church could do would be that, after having vainly endeavored to get the brother to repent and reform, it should withdraw special brotherly fellowship from him until such time as he would express willingness thereafter to do right. Then he should be received again into full fellowship.
    In the meantime the brother may merely be treated in the kindly, courteous way in which it would be proper for us to treat any publican or Gentile, withholding the special rights or privileges or greetings or voting opportunities that belong to the church as a class separate from the world" Watchtower 1919 Mar 1 p.69

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit