Have you ever thought why apostle Paul do not mention wars, pestilence, earthquackes, famine when he talks about the last days? Or why apostle Peter only says, that in the last days ridiculers will come, asking were is his promised presence, and that from the beginning all remains exactly the same? And why does Peter not say: Look at the wars, but says: All has not been the same, because a flood occured. (2Timothy 3:1-5, 2Peter 3:3,4,6)
Have you ever thought why Jesus talked about the sign of the conclusion and his presence, but not of the last days? (Matthew 24:3)
Therefore I believe the last days do not refer to the same time as the conclusion of the system of things and his presence. First will be the last days. Then in the end of the last days comes the conclusion of the system of things and in that time he will be present.
This conclusion will first have a period of 1260 days, and then a small unknown number of days. We can not know the exact number of days, otherwise we could get to know in beforhand the day of battle at Armageddon. Satan will be hurled down in the beginning of 1260 days. (Revelation chap 12, Daniel chap. 12. )
He will be in great anger because he knows he will have a short period of time. Some think this all happened 1914. But it has gone a long time. I do not know if we can call our days the last days, I do not hear people asking "where is His precence?", but we have been waiting for the new world since childhood, and it feels like a delay. That's exactly what Revelation 10:6 confirms about our time: A feeling of delay.
What do you think?