"If a religion is the truth because it follows the Bible, then I need it to not go beyond what is written. If the Bible
was never proven to contain God's name anywhere in the original Greek writings, then the true religion would not
decide that God didn't protect HIS WORD enough, so the religion must put the name there for him. If the Bible
doesn't go into the bedrooms of husbands and wives to dictate what kind of sex they can have, then the true
religion won't either. If you say the Bible does go there, then I would expect that you are saying the Bible claims
that sexual relations are for the purpose of conception, so the true religion would ban all sex unless it was for
husband and wife to have children- nothing else."
So I tried this with the JW who stated it to me yesterday. I spoke with him again.
His response was that the Greek was clearly quoting the Hebrew and it was extremely
most likely that the authors were quoting using the name of Jehovah. He granted that
the most ancient available copies did not contain "Jehovah" but the originals are not
available to us. He stood by this no matter how I pointed out that WTS stands on both
sides of this issue. They say that God protected the Word to make it available to
mankind, but then they say the great apostasy occurred to remove the name, so they
needed to restore it. He just went into a repetition loop.
The next point- true religion going into the bedroom. My friend claimed that we need
morality in our life, and that the government sets rules on accepted sex practices mostly
in the past but still today. I said that we are not talking about government, we are talking
about the one true religion which represents God. He said that he did have some problems
with the past rules about mates being told to divorce a spouse over certain sex practices
and some mates being told they cannot divorce a spouse over homosexual practices.
So my point is that there are cracks in the foundation of the tower. We just need to find
each individual's cracks.