My personal belief is that these kids are not going with out a family
If you have children yourself Burger Time you will acknowledge the role a mother plays with newborn children. I would say the main role of the rest of the family, husband, in-laws etc is to support the mother whilst she 'mothers' the infants. You'll recall that fathering a child describes a different stage in the process :-)
just a loving mother
Just, just a loving a mother. Come on. No further comment from me neccessary. See above.
Again it's the mother's choice,
So the mother makes the perfectly natural decison to bring children onto the planet and before they can finish drawing their first breath she makes the choice to fatally remove herself from them. Doesn't sound like a normal, rational choice that someone in a fit state of mind would make. Commiting medical suicide after giving birth doesn't feel right to me somehow. So what we have here is someone in a very vulnerable position and without question in a high-control group making an irrational decision. I put it to you that she has stolen something from her children. She has taken a 'choice' from a list of options that should never have included suicide.
I see it no differantly then a mother giving a child up for adoption if she can not take care of it.
Specious comparison. In the adoption case the mother recognises her limitations and tries to do what she can to better the life prospects of her child. In this case the mother has 'thought' only of her 'religion' to the detriment of the children. She was perfectly capable of taking care of the children. That much is sure. How about comparing it to a mother who commits suicide for religious reasons straight after giving birth? As for her so-called religious beliefs - resurrections and the like are kinda hard to come by these days. Never seen one yet. Not even on Fox.
in this case the mother is choosing to not accept special treatment
Incorrect. The mother refused to accept normal treatment. The special alternative proposed by the WTS (Factor VII) is dangerous and possibly innapropriate.
Hopefully at some point the children will at least acknowledge the fact that it was her choice, while at the same time probably never understanding that choice.
My pioint is that she stole a 'choice' that was never open to her. The childs right to a mother supercedes her 'right' to commit suicide. Thats why smoking is banned in pubs. Yes, people are free to kill themselves with tobacco, but the right of pub staff to work in non-carcinogenic air is greater. With rights come repsonsibilities and in this case the repsonsibilities to the children have been superceded by a mind-control sect with death-dealing interpretations of Jewish dietary laws.