The Al Gore Nobel Prize Urban Legend (page 3)

jimbo

5go!!!

If you would just take these scientists that you marked as not being credible and insult them by ridiculing them into oblivion, you definitely have to include Al Gore, the least credible man involved.

My opinion!

Jimbo

jimbo

5go!!!

If you would just take these scientists that you marked as not being credible and insult them by ridiculing them into oblivion, you definitely have to include Al Gore, the least credible man involved.

My opinion!

Jimbo

BrentR

Al Gore just a couple weeks ago asked the news media to no longer run any disenting info or interviews regarding global warming. Science is all about peer review and questioning research. By doing that he removed any last trace of science and has made it a religion. Anyone that follows "climate overseer" Gore has just turned themselves over to cult leader plain and simple.

Didn't we all just leave a cult that does not tolerate critical questions or disenting views? WAKE UP and pull your heads out of your asses!

How many doomsday cults can a person get wrapped up in before they start smelling bullsh*&?

Bryan

To be credible you most first be in the field of expertise.

I didn't realize Gore was a climatologist...

5go

I didn't realize Gore was a climatologist...

I think I was on record pointing out Gore is a hypocrite it doesn't make the Global Warming wrong. Gore just doesn't practice what he preaches.

Also Gore put together a documentary citing credible sources on the matter. Something Anti-Global Warming conspiracy theorist rarely do. When they do try to it is only a matter of time before we find out Exxon, or some other interest paid them to cast doubt on the theory; or they fail to come up with a viable competing theory that fits the evidence already gathered on what is going on with the Earth's climate change.

Anti Global Warming Theorist are just like Creationist their theories have been debunked. So they repackage them and call it something else like Intelligent Design. In an attempt to cast doubt on a working theory by arguing the is a viable competing theory. Also it should be given an equal say despite the evidence supporting the working theory, and little to no evidence supporting the competing theory.

They are attempting to argue a negative. Instead of coming up with a working theory, and testing it. They just say global warming has holes therefore can not be real, and our theory is real. Just like IDers with evolution. The fossil record has holes in it, therefore evolution is not real.

uninformed

5go

Last time I checked, evolution WAS a theory, not an established FACT.

Global warming is theory.

Read--"State of Fear" by Crichton. As long as people are afraid, they need the governments to 'protect' them. 30 years ago it was a new ICE AGE on its way. Now its global warming.

What about the Cows with sunglasses and the "ozone hole disaster"?

Run scared, thats what this is all about.

Brant

BurnTheShips

They just say global warming has holes therefore can not be real

LOL. No one says that. And no, they are just saying that evidence that the current warming trend is human caused is very, very weak. Some even dispute that the data gathering is being done right.

Anti Global Warming Theorist are just like Creationist their theories have been debunked.

What theories? What the hell are you talking about? You GW fanboys are making extraordinary claims. We only ask for extraordinary evidence!

they fail to come up with a viable competing theory that fits the evidence already gathered on what is going on with the Earth's climate change.

What, do you expect a theory to come out of someones ass? Climate is extremely complex. Not one single climate model has has ever successfully predicted any future climate sequence.

Anti Global Warming Theorist are just like Creationist their theories have been debunked.

You have repeatedly conflated two completely unrelated issues.

BurnTheShips

5GO

There is a long and impressive list of scientists that contest the so called "consensus". The IPCC report was flawed.

5go

5go

Last time I checked, evolution WAS a theory, not an established FACT.

Yes, it is a working theory. Which is better than a fact because it is made up of a lot of facts working together to make a working theory. There is a program from NOVA that explains this it was on why Intelligent Design was ruled a religious idea by a court in the USA, and not a scientific theory. It was incredibly embarrassing for the ID movement the ID group that attempted to push this was caught perjuring in court also ID was exposed as rebadged creationism, an already debunked theory.

Global warming is theory.

See above same applies. If you want to debunk it put up a working theory that explains what is going on better than global warming. No one has as of yet. The same goes with evoloution.

Read--"State of Fear" by Crichton. As long as people are afraid, they need the governments to 'protect' them. 30 years ago it was a new ICE AGE on its way. Now its global warming.
What about the Cows with sunglasses and the "ozone hole disaster"?
Run scared, thats what this is all about.
Brant

30 years ago it was global dimming. Which it is a theory that is still working, and explains why global temperatures haven't been climbing at the rate they could be if it wasn't for the dimming of light from particulate pollution.

5go

There is a long and impressive list of scientists that contest the so called "consensus".

There is a longer list of more qulaified scientist with a working theory to prove other wise and they agree with the IPCC.

The Al Gore Nobel Prize Urban Legend

Share this