Cooooooll!!!!!
MINIMUS CONDUCTS THE WATCHTOWER!
by WT Comments 32 Replies latest jw friends
-
-
Gopher
Who would have thunk it? Minimus asking Watchtower-related questions!
-
onacruse
Note the IP address for the original poster:
IP: o3eITcYWj7os4qOi
Note the IP address for the third poster:
IP: o3eITcYWj7os4qOi
Interesting, because having multiple accounts is not an acceptable practice on JWD...and oftentimes is indicative of hidden agendas.
-
minimus
I think it was obvious, WT. COMMENTS and V are the same. Wasn't WT COMMENTS created specifically for the WT.summary???
-
V
Onacriuse, welcome to the party. I don't think there is any secret about my affliation with WT Comments.
Actually the alias "WT Comments" is a collaborative identity. You can square that with Blondie, elsewhere, and Simon if you wish.
No hidden agendas. I hope that answers your concern.
-
minimus
V, I'm glad you put any suggestion that you were not to be trusted to bed.
-
stillajwexelder
V, I'm glad you put any suggestion that you were not to be trusted to bed
Is this in the typical or anti-typical fulfillment?
-
minimus
I'll address that during the Watchtower Study.
-
undercover
remember remember the 25th of november
WT magazine, study comments and a seven-up dot
i see no reason why these comments should ever be forgot
-
onacruse
V, I have nothing to square with you or anybody else about this, and I didn't suggest that you were guilty of having a hidden agenda: I merely stated it as a matter of experience, with the intent of possibly informing new members as to why the IP addressess were initiated in the first place, and what JWD policy is regarding having multiple accounts.