the TOWER ANSWERS BACK on NGO

by tula 24 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • tula
    tula

    WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS WEBSITE OPERATION? IS THE TOWER HIDDEN UNDER THIS? WHAT'S YOUR TAKE ON IT?

    Know your NGOs! NEW MATERIAL
    When you hear that the Watchtower Society was a United Nations NGO, you may not be aware that there is actually more than one kind of NGO. This fact is important, and is often deliberately obscured by those who try to condemn and criticize the Society. Read this chapter...

    Introduction: In the Beginning
    In October 2001 The Guardian newspaper in the United Kingdom accused Jehovah's Witnesses of hypocrisy for being registered with the United Nations' (UN) Department of Public Information (DPI) as a Non-Governmental Organization (NGO). Read this chapter...

    Did we agree to praise the UN? NEW CHAPTER
    Conspiracy theorists say we agreed to meet special UN criteria, including a requirement to “print articles praising the UN” to keep our “NGO status”. Is this true? No. Read this chapter...

    Consider the Source
    One man has spent thousands of dollars sending letters to the elders of every congregation in the USA, some in the UK, and all the branch offices to tell them about the NGO “apostasy”. He also wrote a book. Who is he, and should you listen to him? Read this chapter...

    Conclusion: A Not-Guilty Verdict
    We have shown you how the Watchtower Society's DPI NGO status has been blown out of proportion by opposers — and how those same opposers tried to silence us. We have seen how the Society's version of events has been vindicated by the evidence. Read this chapter...

    The modern requirements for DPI NGOS state that “The NGO must support and respect the principles of the Charter of the UN”, however the version the Society saw years earlier did not say this. What did it say? Read this chapter...

    Awake to Propaganda?
    As part of the alleged “secret deals”, the conspiracy theorists say the Watchtower Society wrote “propaganda” for the UN. Is this a reasonable assessment of the evidence, or is it shallow circumstantial evidence for a crazy conspiracy theory? Read this chapter...

    Self-condemnation?
    Accusers say the Society has “condemned itself” in the NGO matter by it's stance on YMCA membership and from when it condemned the Catholic Church for having NGOs with the UN. Are these fair points, or are the critics being misleading? Read this chapter...

    Hail to the Chief
    The United Nations DPI was inundated with requests for information on the Watchtower NGO matter. Hence, Paul Hoeffel, the chief of the DPI's NGO section wrote an open letter. What does it tell us, and is it accurate? Read this chapter...

    Please Sign Nowhere
    In the forms the Society completed there is no place to put a signature. This corroborates the Society's letter to The Guardian newspaper, where Bethel explained, “At the time of the initial application no signature was required on the form.” Read this chapter...

    http://www.jehovahsjudgment.co.uk/watchtower-un-ngo/

  • jeanniebeanz
    jeanniebeanz

    I don't know, but did you read the About Us blurb?

    About

    After initially believing the apostates, we researched the NGO issue and found that all their claims were either blatant lies or nonsense based on pig ignorance. Since publication, apostates have been unable to provide any evidence to support their position.

    I doubt this is the watchtower since it states that the initially believed the 'apostates'. Pretty yucky stuff... renagade witnesses, perhaps?

    J

  • Gopher
    Gopher

    Jeannie,

    My take on it -- these apologists never believed the apostates. They're just saying that for "effect".

  • AK - Jeff
    AK - Jeff

    Watchtower apologists IMO. Not directly from the Tower - though the tower might be ok with this info to dissuade those about to leave.

    Jeff

  • Paralipomenon
    Paralipomenon

    Best part is, the WTS would disfellowship them for having an unauthorized site.

  • Bumble Bee
    Bumble Bee

    As far as I know, the person that runs that site used to be on E-Watchmans site. They had a major falling out and for a while there was a pretty nasty internet war going on between EW, Timothy Kline and thirdwitness (who originally ran the site above, don't know if he still does). They are all a bunch of wackos.

  • Zico
    Zico

    That's 3rdWitness' site. He used to post here.

    He's an apologist, it's not official.

  • tula
    tula

    I am wondering if someone wrote Bethel asking about the NGO if Tower would respond using any of this info. Looks like someone has put a lot of effort into damage control. And the way they use the tower buzzwords.... well, the tower must be behind them in some way to allow this info to look so official and to be so pro tower.

    does brothel bethel respond to inquiries at all?

    anyone know?

  • Gopher
    Gopher

    About whether you can get responses from Brooklyn Bethel, read this:

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/143498/1.ashx

  • OUTLAW
    OUTLAW

    It`s BrainDead "3rd Witness"..The guy is an absolute goof!..He ignores everything,except what he wants to believe..AlanF has Ripped Him Up pretty good in the past...OUTLAW

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit