Gaps in Fossil Record Disprove Evolution? What about Gaps in Creationism?

by Reluctant Buddha 69 Replies latest watchtower bible

• 

  Reluctant Buddha

  Missing Links Disprove a Theory??? What About THIS One, Creationists!!!
  	--vs--
  REAL T-Rex		Creationist T-Rex

  Creationists, aka the not-so-intelligent "Intelligent Design" advocates, claim that before the fall of Adam & Eve there was no death and killing. Therefore, the T-Rex must have had cud-chewing flat cow-like teeth at the time, suitable for eating vegetables, rather than massive fangs, with are totally useless for eating grass and vegetables. That being the case, WHERE IS THE FOSSIL CUD-CHEWING T-REX with the flat grinding cud-chewing molars? Ohhh, they are MISSING, are they? Totally, completely, and utterly MISSING from the fossil record, are they? And you arrogantly MOCK evolution, claiming that ANY "gaps in the theory for which there is no evidence" disprove it? If that's so, then the lack of cow-like T-Rex's throws the ball right back into your court, you friggin' hypocrites. YOU made the assertion, now WHERE'S the evidence??? Thousands upon thousands of fossils have been dug up in the last 200 years, and not ONCE has a carnivore (t-Rex, lion, tiger, shark, wolf, bear, etc) been found with the kind of teeth your "Intelligent Design" theory demands.
  
  NEENER NEENER NEERNER! Jesus is a BEANER!
• 

  Star Moore

  Maybe they ate bark or roots or other hard types of vegetation??
• 

  moshe

  Since G-d is the perfect designer, why did T-Rex become extinct? Did he get too mean for his own good?

  G-d seems to be continually letting species go extinct- how much time do humans have left before G-d brings out the new and improved model?

  Moshe
• 

  seattleniceguy

  Star Moore,

  Maybe they ate bark or roots or other hard types of vegetation??

  That would be an interesting proposition of you could find an example of any other species with teeth like that which is not a carnivore.

  SNG
• 

  seattleniceguy

  Star,

  Sorry, forgot to say, welcome to the board!

  SNG
• 

  seesthesky

  SNG: That would be an interesting proposition of you could find an example of any other species with teeth like that which is not a carnivore.
  
  
  ME: Not sure but I think gorillas have sharp teeth but are not carnivores.
• 

  seattleniceguy

  seethesky,

  Here are a few photos of gorilla teeth:

  Notice their nice big molars, just perfect for crunching vegetation! T-Rex would have had a hard time with a dinner salad, but gorillas have it under control.

  SNG
• 

  seesthesky

  SNG, pictures of gorilla teeth - very interesting - thanks
• 

  Reluctant Buddha

  Notice their nice big molars, just perfect for crunching vegetation! T-Rex would have had a hard time with a dinner salad, but gorillas have it under control.

  SNG
  
  SNG I am unsure of the point and purpose of your post. Yes, a T Rex would be unable to eat a salad which is precisely the point. Their teeth are for tearing meat. Plus you are ignoraing the point of the post; that fossils of cow-toothed T-Rex are nonexistant. Creationists argue thet missing links prove evolution false, but they do not understand their theory has millions upon millions of missings links.
• 

  Reluctant Buddha

  Star Moore, can you read? I must conclude from your response that you cannot, or you read without comprension. The point of the post is that:
  
  1. Creationists claim that "missing links" in the fossil record disprove evolution.
  
  2. If creationism is true, a cow-toothed T Rex must have existed
  
  3. There are no fossils of cow-toothed T Rex
  
  4. Fangs, which the T Rex possessed, cannot be used to chew vegetation.
  
  5. Hence, if creationism is true, there must have been a cow-toothed T Rex
  
  6. No cow-toothed T Rex fossils exist
  
  7. By creationists own reasoning this shows cow-tooth T Rex never existed.
  
  For the rest of you, my apologies for having to repeat and reword and reexplain the post