What crazy fool imagines any law firm handling any form of case would chose to pick the worse, most unlikely cases out of them to represent? Of course they will chose those most likely to proceed with the best chance of success. To do otherwise would be criminal.
To try and make out that them getting the best outcome for their clients is somehow wrong or underhand is utterly ridiculous.
Wouldn't it be better to focus on WHY are they able to get settlements in those cases? Isn't it because the WTS is guilty of wrongdoing and choses to pay to make the problem go away / protect their name.
Remind us again how they represent God ...