YOUR VOICE IS URGENTLY NEEDED!!!

by SWALKER 21 Replies latest social current

  • seattleniceguy
    seattleniceguy

    It's easy to have knee-jerk reactions when the words "environment," "oil," and "wildlife" are invoked. In politics these words can be used as emotionally-loaded tools which evoke responses just as powerful as the Witness responses to "apostate" or "Christendom." However, it's important to realize that the answers to political questions are almost never cut-and-dried.

    The problem of oil is a big one. If oil becomes prohibitively expensive before a suitable replacement is found, it would almost certainly have devastating consequences on our economy. Remember, "the economy" doesn't just mean the fat cats in downtown skyscrapers. It refers to the ability to produce and deliver food and products to supermarkets, the ability to obtain healthcare and services, the ability to have a functioning infrastructure. We depend on oil energy every day.

    There is a silver lining in all of this. The price of oil will continue to rise, which produces financial incentive to find alternative energy sources. If you read sites like physorg.com, you see that there are almost daily advances in alternative energy sources. It is not a matter of if, but a matter of when, we will move from oil to the next energy source. But during the transition, we must maintain an uninterrupted flow of energy. So we are forced to make some difficult decisions, such as whether to drill in ANWR.

    No one wants to see the cute woodland animals displaced. But life on earth has dealt with much more drastic events than oil wells and a couple pipelines for millions of years. For example, ice ages, metorite strikes, volcanos, and floods have been vastly more impactful than oil drilling. In the grand scheme of things, this oil exploration is a small matter.

    Cutting off the oil or having it become very expensive before we are ready for it is not an option. The days of oil usage are running out, so we can honestly look at this as a temporary measure. The real focus should be on making sure that the oil exploration is done responsibily and in cooperation with the local people.

    Just my three cents.

    SNG

  • SWALKER
    SWALKER

    Former President Jimmy Carter brought up the drilling for oil in Alaska last night on Larry King Live. He stated "This area of land was designated by (Wilson?) to always be a natural habitat" and he signed into law a protection for this and stated this would never be broken. Here goes Bush again undoing what others have worked so hard to preserve and undermining the USA.

    Why should we even say a word about the Amazon Basin disappearing or the devastation done to the African landscape, if we can't protect a few special areas in our own land? Has it helped out those countries to devastate their own land...has it made them richer or poorer? Maybe they should have considered tourism as an option before wiping out and decimating animal and plant life.

    Has anyone been paying attention to how much profit the oil companies are making??? Why aren't they pushing for alternate sources of energy and using that vast amount of money for research instead of trying to find more new places to drill for oil???????

    Most posters seem to think that it will all be fixed somehow in the future...maybe that will be too late. What will you tell the future generations? Sometimes a small voice can be heard...look at Rosa Parks!

    Swalker

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit