So far my research has shown that the Society did indeed commit 'spiritual adultery', has lied, and has acted with gross hypocrisy and double-standards over the whole NGO affair. The evidence is pretty damning.
I was just curious whether they had since contradicted their 1 June 2003, 'new light' about not knowing who the human agencies are and that we shouldn't speculate, but alas, they have indeed recently contradicted themselves on this, yet again. It's wrong to speculate and they don't know, but it will still apparently be 'elements within the UN' according to a recent Watchtower article this year. Isn't that still speculating and pretty much still saying the 'agency' will be the UN?
(shrugs shoulders and scratches head)
Maybe I'll write to the Society and ask them how they explain this discrepancy. Waste of time I guess.