by hooberus 14 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
His assertion 3 minutes in that it would not be possible or desirable to encode a message in the DNA is utter nonsense.
It would be ridiculously simple to encode such a message from the creator and protect it from loss by mutation.
In fact storage of information in DNA is an active field of investigation.
If the creator had encoded a simple signature in the code of every living thing we would not be having this debate.
He gets off to a really bad start in his argument
'Encrypted messages don't serve survival. The designs of life MUST serve survival, and also be a message'.
Hooby even you can see the self-contradiction in that sentence.
How can anybody start a well-prepared lecture with such a blatant own-goal and expect to be taken seriously?
Hooby?
I was going to watch your video Hooby and offer a series of responses to each of his points but if you can't be bothered to engage why would I?
Hooby?
