TJ,
Notion commotion.
A notion implies a belief. I have suggested that you present evidence for that belief, it may have escaped your notice that this is what this discussion is actually about - the implication of a 'notion'! If you are unable to provide needed evidence to support your 'notion', as you seem to imply, then I might suggest that next time you have a 'notion', you not use NAMES. Do you get it now TJ? Your 'notions' are just that, yet you chose to introduce more than belief into the issue by defining persons who are the object of your 'notion', and now you need to defend your 'notion', before readers succumb to a 'notion' about your 'notion'.
Now... if you try reeeal hard, you might be able to use your own words to understand what I meant when I say there is a Cult of Farkel / JanH / AlanF on this board.
And now, TJ, you seem to have moved from a 'notion' to an absolute ( as I surmised from your posts anyway! ). You say 'that there is a Cult of Farkel / JanH / AlanF on this board'. This is presented as a statement of fact. No longer a 'notion'. Sometimes TJ, I enjoy your posts, other times one wonders what motivates you to express your thoughts. Anyway, I am certainly not going to get locked into a frustrating debate that goes on for another fifteen pages. I am sure that when you provide proof for your twice highlighted statement above, we can all go home and fondle our 'notions'.
Best regards - HS