Darkspilver's attacks - time to respond!

by The Searcher 12 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • The Searcher
    The Searcher

    Remember, remember - darkSPILVER or darkSPLIVER couldn't even remember his username! https://www.jehovahs-witness.com/topic/282501/calebs-aeroplane-returns-w14-11-15-p-16

    Let's consider SPILVER or SPLIVER'S posts - since he likes to do it to others!

    In his first few posts he was asked by Blondie "How do you search your info?" Silence. In another post he was asked by a member how he woke up. Silence. No story to share, Mr. SPLIVER?

    Something is very puzzling about Mr. SPILVER or SPLIVER's 155-odd posts, he never once (that I could find) seriously criticizes the org, its G.B., or its teachings and practices, but when I submit proof of an org perversion, he is only too willing to attack me!

    It begs the serious question - What possible motive would anyone on this site have for trying to discredit sincere and factual criticisms of the org and its teachings? In his latest example, he blatantly introduces specious information in order to divert attention away from the fact that J.W.'s governing body is advocating confession - immediately followed by either forgiveness or punishment by the elders!: https://www.jehovahs-witness.com/topic/5159427667656704/faithful-slave-urges-confession-latest-watchtower?page=5

    Many of his his 155-odd posts regarding the WTBTS/J.W.'s, merely consist of media articles which are already in the public domain - again, with zero critical comments from himself. Very strange that he saves all of his vitriol for someone who openly denounces the org. The "golden calf" being decried seems to hit a raw nerve, so I'll take his unwarranted attacks as back-handed compliments from a very bitter individual.

    Since most of us here are aware of how "theocratic warfare" works, he needn't bother trying to appear anti-org now, by submitting some "blatant" criticism.

    I look forward to hearing his justifiable counter-arguments - not ad hominem attacks.

    Bottom line - what is his real agenda?

  • stan livedeath
    stan livedeath

    i think dark spliver's username was a spelling error. it should be dark silver.

  • Wake Me Up Before You Jo-Ho
    Wake Me Up Before You Jo-Ho

    @stan livedeath His username always reminds me of vintage porno actress' name, Georgina Spelvin.

  • zeb
    zeb

    perhaps he/she needs to get out more?

  • amicabl
    amicabl

    I wonder how many are searching for Georgina Spelvin right now.

  • Wake Me Up Before You Jo-Ho
    Wake Me Up Before You Jo-Ho

    @amicabl They're a few decades too late. Last I heard of Georgina Spelvin, she was having her pap smear done at the coroner's office. Probably tested positive for dust.

  • waton
    waton

    I would not take any posts personally, even if they are. Of course some posters seem to get their jollies out of trying to decimate others, but hey, deal with the substance.

    Any defense of wt policies or past is meat for exposure, and we have carnivores here.

  • scratchme1010
    scratchme1010

    It begs the serious question - What possible motive would anyone on this site have for trying to discredit sincere and factual criticisms of the org and its teachings?

    I agree with not taking that poster too seriously. Normally people who are up for sharing in a forum, even when they want to discuss or disagree, they tend to be respectful, and even if they are not, they can provide at least a reasoning behind their thinking.

    When a person shows that kind of attitude, that is, getting personal every single time and always wanting to say something but not listening to anything, then it's just not worthy.

    Do what some people do with some of my posts, and what I do with some other people's posts, just ignore.

  • Earnest
    Earnest

    I don't know how he searches for his info but he regularly comes up with accurate, cited information on a subject under discussion.

  • DesirousOfChange
    DesirousOfChange

    Look at it this way, Searcher. If he's critical of you, he's leaving "innocent" people alone. It's like any random group of people, there's always one asshole.

    I always appreciate your comments!

    Doc

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit