The Bad Science Scandal - Research Fact Fabrication - UK News article.

by *lost* 73 Replies latest social current

  • *lost*
    *lost*

    The Independent Neswpaper UK - Tues 18th June 2013

    The Bad Science Scandal - How Fact Fabrication is damaging UK's Global Research Name.

    After a string of high profile cases, a new agreement between scientists and the people who fund them aims to usher in a new era of

    'research purity'

    Britains leading scince institutions will be told on Monday that they will be stripped of many millions of pounds in research grants

    if they employ 'rogue researchers' who fake the results of experiments The Independent has learnt.

    The clamp dwon comes as retractions of scientific claims by medical journals are on course to top 500 for the first time in 2013 - having been just 20 a year in the late 1990's, when Andrew Wakefield notoriously claimed that the

    MMR vaccine casued autism in children.

    In April, the UK's first researcher was jailed for falsifying data over a prolonged period.

    The Government is concerned that Britain's prized second place in global reearch, behind the US will be threatened if more fact-fabricators are exposed.

    It knows that hundreds of thousands of jobs could easily go to foreign rivals if British laboratories do not keep coming up with new product ideas,

    to be made by major multi national companies in UK factories to sign a new

    Concordat for Research Integrity

    having been warned by major fund providers that those who do not will be refused access to more than £10 billion in research grants

    funded each year by British tax payers - ad as much again from the private sector.

    A spokesman for Universitites UK, which chaired negotiations with the grant providers, said

    '' from next year, Universities in the UK will have to prove compliance with the research grant. They are doing this to help demonstrate to

    Government

    Business,

    International Partners and

    the wider public,

    that they can continue to have confidence in the research.''

    Retractions of medical claims alon in 2013 - logged by the Retraction Watch Blog - are certain to be more than 400 and could easily top 500.

    some result from genuine mistakes, several plagiarise other scientsist's work, breakthroughs that haven't been checked.

    But as many as one in ten of them contain lies.

    Retractions watch last week reported that the Pharmacueticals giant

    GlaxoSmithKline is believed to have fired Jingwu Zang, a former Senior Vice President and head of the R+D at it's Shangai facility, after claims he made in the journal.

    Natrue Medicine were, as a company spokes woman admitted, ''misrepresented''

    This is just an excerpt of the article and more can be read about it on the Independent Newspaper's website.

  • metatron
    metatron

    This an another area of important exposure in our world. Not only is there frequent fraud, there is a huge problem with unreported negative results and also bad statistical work in medical research.

    Random, double blind tests make sense logically but of what value are they - pro or con - until these other issues are dealt with? Keep in mind that the frauds exposed may not tell anyone how much unexposed wrongdoing remains.

    metatron

  • fulltimestudent
    fulltimestudent

    Fraud, for whatever purpose is likely to be with us forever (i.e.- its part of human nature). But this story and its eventual exposure highlights the importance of peer review. Modern scholarship is best marked as subject to review by the peers of the researcher, leading eventually to exposure of fraud.

    That's the opposite to religious attitudes, where it is too often claimed that the (claimed) words of gods or their prophets cannot be critiqued. (I should note though, that within Buddhism there is a tradition of critiquing ideas,)

  • besty
    besty
    Keep in mind that the frauds exposed may not tell anyone how much unexposed wrongdoing remains

    also I am very concerned about the rising number of unreported murders that remain unsolved...something has to be done.

  • cofty
    cofty

    "Won't somebody please think of the children"

  • bohm
    bohm

    The good news is everyone in the scientific community is talking about fraud and false positive studies - its a lot more risky to cheat nowadayes.

  • slimboyfat
    slimboyfat

    Yeah remember how they faked the global warming thing in Norwich.

  • Phizzy
    Phizzy

    I guess this just proves that all science can be ignored, especially where it contradicts the Bible. LOL

  • slimboyfat
    slimboyfat

    Scientism is a pernicious little philosophy whose time is moving to a close.

  • besty
    besty

    @SBF

    Yeah remember how they faked the global warming thing in Norwich.

    Assuming you are referring to the so-called Climategate, it appears you know more than the 8 investigations into the affair which completely and absolutely exonerated the scientists involved of any wrongdoing whatsover, and without reservation.

    Including:

    • House of Commons Science and Technology Committee
    • Science Assessment Panel
    • Pennsylvania State University (twice)
    • Independent Climate Change Email Review
    • United States Environmental Protection Agency report
    • Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Commerce
    • National Science Foundation

    Spreading misinformation is not helpful, especially when accurate information is readily available.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_email_controversy

    Now as well as denying climate science, you have to invoke a 2nd layer conspiracy theory around the investigations noted above. Special pleading allows Occams Razor not to apply to this for you I guess.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit