Lars ***Many can't accept that I'm the Christ, either, but the Bible requires the Christ to be in the body of a gay black man at the second coming****
Where is the scriptural support for this Lars ?
Thanks
Okay, it's pretty simple. Noe that in the parable of the prodigal son, when he returns, he receives a new robe, "the best one" and the father gives him a banquet where the young bull is slaughtered. Elsewhere in the bible the "kingdom of the heavens" is about a father giving a son a wedding banquet wherein the young bull is slaughtered. So this leads some to interpret that this is the same private banquet of the messiah and that the prodigal son is here becoming the messiah.
This is contrasted with Zech 3 where we find messianic character of high-priest Joshua becoming a king. The first coming is about a sacrifice, the second one is when Christ returns as a king-priest. So here is a priest becoming a king, so we know this is specifically about the second coming and not the first. But we find a clear parallel here, that is, we find Joshua, representing the messiah, arriving with befouled garments which represents his past sins. But he, like the prodigal son, is being given new robes and being made a king. This adds to the idea of the parable of the prodigal son being a messianic prophesy relating to the 2nd coming. But note the parallels. You have someone coming from a life of sin becoming the Christ, in this case, represented by getting a new robe and past sins forgiven.
At his point, we have to conclude that the messiah at the second coming is not only back in the flesh, but that he uses the body of an imperfect man with a history of many past sins.
Now to seal this off, to confirm that indeed we are interpreting this correctly, we note there is a difference between the two wave offerings. There is a first and a second. The first wave offering is during the festival of unfermented cakes so a lot of focus is on unleavened bread. Leaven represents sin and the unleavened bread represents Christ's sinless physical body at the frist coming. Pentecost is linked with the "1335 days" which thus links it to the 2nd coming. Of course, the 2nd wave offering occurs at Pentecost. This time, though, loaves from the house with leaven are being offered up. Huh?
But this is very simple. It simply means Christ's body at the first coming is perfect and sinless, but at the second coming, as we have deduced by the comparison of the parable of the prodigal son and Zech 3 about high-priest Joshua. the physical body of Christ being one with leaven, means Christ is in an imperfect body!
Now we get another illustration of this in Revelation where we see Christ, as Michael the archangel, kicking Satan down to the earth where he then pursues Christ's followers represented by a woman who must be hidden in the wilderness by God. But she is seen giving birth to a child who is caught up to heaven to the throne of god. This is clearly the messiah. But how can that be? This is what the WTS stuggled with. This is clearly the messiah being born from this woman on the earth, when there is a Christ already in heaven. How can that be? If this woman represents Christ's followrers, though, the ones following him in secret, then this child, this messiah, is one of her members being chosen to be the Christ. This person, again, must be an imperfect man. So we have another confirmation that Christ would be in an imperfect body at the second coming. The child being taken up to heaven to the throne of God, indicates that he is going to the bosom position of the father, where Christ is, and thus the two... become one!
So that's how Christ bnecomes flesh again at the second coming ACCORDING TO THE BIBLE, through the agency of another human adult, but an adult who lived the life of the prodigal son up until the last minute.
So now that we have that settled, we can look closer at what the Bible tells us about the description of this person. We know he lived the life of the prodigal son. We know from the Ethiopian eunuch reading from isa 53 that his physical appearance would be that of a gay black male. In the Bible a eunuch is a gay person (note you can be celibate and still be a gay person, so no indication in this reference is there to any overt homosexuality, eunuchs were expected to remain single and celibate). It also indicates that he would be a black person.
Now that is confirmed to the elect, by the image of the "sign of the son of man" which appears in heaven to them of the dead black messiah. A drawing of his, of course, as I'ved posted many times, is found in the Revelation book, proving the elect and the GB have seen this sign and at one level had to take this interpretation seriously that Christ would appear in the body of a black male at the 2nd coming. So that the messiah is in a black man's body at the 2nd coming is confirmed by the Ethiopian eunuch reading Isa 53 but also the actual "sign of the son of man" which shows the face of the dead messiah to be black.
So this is the point of no return. If you are looking for anything other than a gay black messiah, you are not following scripture. Of course, you can choose to ignore this interpretation if you wish and just be in denial.
BUT...there's also the JW chronology! 2520 years from the fall of Jerusalem marking the year of the 2nd coming. 607 BCE is just a wrong date for the fall of Jerusalem on many counts. There was revisionism for this period, but apparently the Jews did preserve some astronomical references in diaries of the original timeline which we can use to reset the reign of Nebuchadnezzar II, the most documented dating for any foreign ruler in the Bible in connection with Jewish history. The two critical documents, well known to the WTS, are the VAT4956 and the SK400. Each contain matched references to the rule of Nebuchadnezzar. The SK400 dates year 7 of Neb2 to 541 BCE and the VAT4956 dates year 37 to 511 BCE. Both would begin the rule of Nebuchadnezzar in 547 BCE and year 19, the year Jerusalem falls, in 529 BCE which means the 2nd coming would occur in 1992.
So, since 1992 is a past date, with this interpretation in hand of Christ being in the body of a gay black male, the question is did that occur as prophesied that year? The answer is YES! It was fulfilled by me, to my own great surprise, that very year.
So now we have two levels of realilties in modern times to deal with. One, of course, is the "sign of the son of man" depicting the christ as a dead black messiah, and two, my Bible knowledge and ability to expose false WTS doctrines.
Now, "interpretation belongs to God" but at this point, reality confirms that interpretation is true.
Now my issue is not so much trying to convince the world that I'm the true Christ, but showing what the Bible teaches and where the corrected chronology is pointing, as well as to show that the WTS has known about this for a long time, and in fact, has cooperated in suppressing God's work. The Bible, for instance, notes that the UN is allowed to kill the two witnesses and their witnessing for 3.5 days. The WTS was a member of the UN since early 1992. Is that a coincidence? Maybe the UN understood the messiah would come through the WTS and so this became a joint effort. The appearance of the "sign of the son of man", of course, would be what made this a priority for them. This was something miraculous, believed in by a group of people. I wrote a letter to the WTS, to the GB and the Writing Committee on November 10, 1992, basically disfellowshipping the GB and telling them they would be in spiritual darkness. I didn't know I would become the Christ at that time, but that gave Fred Franz a chance to investigate me, and to find out if I was black, and perhaps gay! The UN agents used drugs on me to try to prevent me from going into a deep transe for the 2 days needed for the "transmigration" to take place. Funny to me, the date of the 2nd coming which should have aligned with the winter solstice on December 21, didn't take place, but Fred Franz died the very next day, executed by Jehovah, likely for his cooperation and participation in interrupting God's plan. the 2nd coming took place on the 25th while the Christ was in a commercial dumpster, safe from UN agents and their surveillance and tracking devices.
So even if you don't like this interpretation, there's no option now, since the REALITY has confirmed the interpretation that the christ would be in an imperfect body of the Ethiopian eunuch, that is, a gay black male, who arrives in 1992.
So where IS this person? Where is this Christ who has so much Bible knowledge?
Here I am! Examine my background and see if it fits what the Bible is takling about.
Now the parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus is also about the Christ. Here we find Lazarus at the end in the bosom position of the Father, clearly showing him to be the Christ, the messiah. When he was spiritually sick, though, his ulcers were licked by dogs. Dogs in the Bible are linked with straight men who sodomized male prostitutes who dressed up like women in ancient times. So that scenario where Lazarus is surrounded by dogs who lick and thus sooth his wounds, his desires, lends to Lazarus being a cross-dressing male prostitute. In the parable of the prodigal son it is said he wasted his inheritants in the company of "harlots." But the question is, was he having sex with these harlots or prostitutes, or were these harlots his companions, thus indicating he was a harlot or prostitute himself? Well, when we compare that with Lazarus, we know the latter is the case. The prodigal son was in the company of harlots because he himself was a harlot at one point.
So you take that, and investigate my life to see if that detail fits my past to fulfill this detail about the Christ, and I tell you that I was arrested in Seattle, WA once for prostitution, which proves I was a prostitute at one point. This is embarrassing, but it is also a necessary fulfillment of prophecy. Even though, the Bible is just describing who God would choose as the messiah's physical identity at the second coming and it is just illustrating some details of my life and who I wasand what things shocked God as far as my behavior goes, at one point, but then how all that was forgiven when I returned to the truth and to a moral lifestyle.
So all the mourning and crying and beating themselves in lamentation over me has to do with the "two witnesses" the "eagles" who followed my life from the time I was born. They had to go through seeing me leave the truth and become spiritually dead.
But that's another thing you have to deal with! If you don't have a scenario of a dead messiah at the 2nd coming, then what is allthe mourning and crying all about?
So the Bible tells us about the 2nd coming, though not in such a direct manner, but it does! And I'm he! IT"S real.
I have a "messiah video" that discusses the 2nd coming scriptures but also shows me in drag and how the WTS knew all about this via their subliminal artwork here: Check it out and if you have any questions let me know. It also shows you the photo of the "sign of the son of man" that appeared to the skyscape potographer in 1998 on December 26th to help convince the anointed that I, indeed, was the Christ.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SKEKrp5EqI
