With all this mumbo jumbo and use of words what the GB has done is identify two groups, one within the other. So now we have a special group identified within the FDS.
It is quite annoying that they continually refer to 'food provided by the FDS' whereas that is not correct as it is only provided by this special group. A huge percentage of the FDS have nothing to do with providing information.
Quote from above - Should not individual members of the anointed and the “other sheep” trust the slave appointed over them?
The annointed individuals form the FDS so how can the FDS be appointed above the individual? I agree that there is a requirement that they work in unity and therefore are in obediance to the collective group and this allows for the co-hesian that they want but they are doing a very good job of seperating the GB from the FDS and making it a different group.