To all Bible believers... and non

by dawg 91 Replies latest jw friends

  • lovelylil
    lovelylil

    dawg,

    The problem with the Bible is like the saying goes: its like a fiddell and you can play many tunes on it. Everyone thinks they can use the Bible to prove their point about God. You simply cannot. There is no way of knowing if any of us is really getting the "right" interpetation of the Bible all the time. I don't even think it is that important. What about people who never read the bible and yet believe in God? God gave evidence he exists in creation so we were without excuse that he exists. I personally like reading the bible but I understand that most of it is not literal. I like the literal truths it conveys though. But whether or not God exists, or accepts us, or whether we are Christians or not, is not dependant on understanding the Bible. It just is not. You have to take it for what it is, but remember that even Jesus said "love" was the most important thing. Not Bible interpretation.

    Also, I believed in a God way before I even knew what the Bible was. And there are a lot of people in the world just like that. One more thing, none of us regardless of our beliefs can "box" who or what God is into our own ideals. We can never fully understand him, I don't care how much scripture you read. Peace, Lilly

  • Shawn10538
    Shawn10538

    Renaia, I see you are still making all the wrong arguments. Not to be condescending, but I want you to think for a second: Since when does one need to offer an alternative belief system when one points out the untruthfulness of a belief system? To prove something false, does not put one in the position to have to come up with something to fill some IMAGINARY void in your life. If YOU feel a void in your life, don't go scrambling for someone else's prefab belief system complete with a name, and boundaries and rules and stories. Do the mature thing and see a therapist! The therapist will help you find out what that void is and how best to fill it. Embracing the lies of the WTS is not a good way to fill the void. I am an atheist with my own set of beliefs. I do not subscribe to any named pre fab belief system including the atheist belief systems. My atheism is very different in nature to al other atheists. I do not follow or worship anyone, yet I do not feel a void in my life or lack purpose. Why don't you PM me and ask me why and how this is the case? And, once again, you seem to be saying that you are a JW be cause it is convenient, you like it and it fills a void. You by your own admission are not a JW because you think it is the TRUTH!!! (You may not like the truth, it may not be convenient, the truth may not necessarily fill a void in your life, the truth might a tually create a void in your life. Can you handle that if that is the case? If the truth is that we are all alone in the universe, will you just plug into some religion and try to make yourself believe that religion because it FEELS better to think there is a God? If there is no God, will you manipulate yourself to believe there is one anyway because you can't handle the idea that we live once and die forever and there is no grand purpose to the world or your life beyond what purpose you give yourself? I would love to hear that you decide to look into that void honestly and instead of hiding your head in the sand of some religion/drug to pretend that you are filling that imaginary void, confront that the void is of your own making, and that it doesn't really exist unless you make it exist. Incidentally, psychologists and doctors typically describe that void as "clinical depression" and medical drugs can help as much as self-exploration.

  • Rapunzel
    Rapunzel

    "The Bible is full of interest. It has noble poetry in it; and some clever fables; and some blood-drenched history; and some good morals; and a wealth of obscenity; and upward of a thousand lies." - Mark Twain

    "When one reads the Bible, one is less surprised at what the Deity knows than at what He doesn't know." - Mark Twain

  • dawg
    dawg

    This was the first thing I posted on this thread...

    "It’s a simple question; I’m just curious how you see yourselves differently than any JW in which you attack. And please, don’t insult my intellect talking about evolution, this thread isn’t about the existence of God nor the belief in Evolution, its’ about why you defend the indefensible"

    And yet many of you continue to talk about the belief in God or why man suffers... Lord, this is simple...I'm saying the Bible isn't the word of God and I want to know why you defend it.

  • dawg
    dawg

    Aguest... You are a sweetheart, but we're done... Adam ate a fruit and all of us suffer for it... That was the original comment I made... I refuse to be sucked into all that you've written because you dance around this fact and continue making comments that are way off line from the point... I hope you have peace also, but your replies are only strengthening my point of contention...

  • R.Crusoe
    R.Crusoe

    For most I propose it is a powerful mix of association between what is all around in nature and life with a 'convenient' book to explain it all, when a young child!

    So the love and 'feeling' that a young child has is imprinted and indoctrinated with a book said to be from this 'big loving invisible boss' - Santas mate ( in more ways than one)

    The reality is hardly anyone accepts they have been hoodwinked as a child and lets themselves make the next big mistake:

    Thinking the love they feel inside is because god loves them especially and had made the Bible available to them in preference to millions of others on planet Earth!

    So the accept it as the perfect adult faery story!

    The facts are that if they had been born elsewhere they already know as fact that they would not believe what they do - yet they do not ever accept that a fair god would ensure everyone had the same book if it were meant to be from him!

    And the facts are that some peoples, such as in Amazonia, have gone from before the times of Christ up to the present day with no knowledge of him - scuppering all ideas of god praching Earthwide his message!

    But as we know, many people cannot leave go of what a lifetime of emoton and thought and socialising has delivered them. In fact I know of some who would hate me if I were to say wha I believe to certain older ones who harbor wishes of paradise or whateva - as if I was cruel in some way! That's how fickle humanity is and nevermind all the hurt I carried for decades due to it!!

    I look and see people of life! I look and see some for thousands of years with their own unique belief and lifestyle absent all writings! And I know that if there is a god he is quite happy with them!

  • AGuest
    AGuest

    that you feel we need to be "done" (and the greatest of peace to you!). If you can find it in your heart, however, to please take a few moments and read all that I have written to you here, I'd like to clarify. If you can't, then perhaps you will just scroll down to the bottom and read my summary, as it's only a few sentences.

    Okay, then, you asked "why do we suffer," which question I misunderstood. I did not read that you meant "we suffer because of Adam," but literally WHY we suffer. I tried to answer that question truthfully. My sincere apologies for misunderstanding you. In response, you restated what you meant:

    Adam ate a fruit and all of us suffer for it...

    And my response to that was, in essence, not quite. This truly oversimplifies what occurred and why, and the result/consequence and why. This is the TRUTH. And such oversimplification... or, in some cases, overcomplication, is what leads to people being misled. I assume that when folks like you ask a question, they want the TRUTH... the WHOLE truth... and nothing BUT the truth. And I tried in all sincerity to give you that.

    That was the original comment I made...

    Again, my apologies, but that doesn't seem to be the case. For example, although you state in your next to last post here that:

    This was the first thing I posted on this thread... "It’s a simple question; I’m just curious how you see yourselves differently than any JW in which you attack. And please, don’t insult my intellect talking about evolution, this thread isn’t about the existence of God nor the belief in Evolution, its’ about why you defend the indefensible" And yet many of you continue to talk about the belief in God or why man suffers... Lord, this is simple...I'm saying the Bible isn't the word of God and I want to know why you defend it...

    When I read your opening post, however, I did not read that as your ORIGINAL comment, but the LAST of the comments in your original post. Your ORIGINAL comment indicated that Adam eating and the consequences, as you understand them, is a myth. I quote:

    "Just take the whole Eve and Adam story and try to defend it… in this myth, we have a God who tells his children not to eat a fruit, and if they eat it they will die… then he kills all subsequent children because of what his elder kids did."

    In response to that comment, I responded, as a NON "Bible Believer" that:

    I think I understand the point you're trying to make (hypocrisy); however, the way you're trying to make it may not be as clear as you think.

    In a subsequent post, I attempted to clarify, starting with your presentation of what took place in Eden. As you stated: "in this myth." And what I tried to say is that this version IS a myth, which is why folks are hard-pressed to defend it. You also wrote:

    Then the story relates that a question was raised by his heavenly children and this is the reason he wreaks all this misery in his undeserving children who did nothing at all.

    And my response was WHOSE "story," the WTBTS'? And, again, that this is yet another error, which is why folks are hard-pressed to defend it. You go on and write:

    This question must be answered,

    And again, I tried to point out the error, that this was NOT the question raised or needing to be answered (and thus, why folks are hard-pressed to defend it). You then write:

    If the question raised in the garden was whether humans could live perfect lives serving their creator, then a God from the heavens, given special healing powers, raising the dead, feeding thousands with a fish; a God man like this isn’t Adam or a human at all… he’s a God and thusly doesn’t answer the question raised in the garden.

    And so I tried to point out that the TRUTH is that the question raised was NOT "whether humans could live perfect lives serving their creator" and that REASON Bible defenders are in the position they're in is because they do not get the sense of my Lord's words at John 5:39, 40.

    "... indeed, one should really leave off from that and follow the words of the One they CLAIM to be following by following the Bible, who said:

    "You are searching the scriptures because you THINK
    that by means of THEM you will have everlasting life.
    And these are the very ones that bear witness about ME.
    And yet, you do not want to come... to ME... that you
    may HAVE life." John 5:39, 40"

    But then it appears (to me, at least) that you took a turn and began to ask me as to the truth of whether sin entered the world through Adam, to which I responded that yes, but not quite as you present it. Which is the entire JIST of my response to you:

    You are deriding ex-JWs for deriding JWs, when the things they believe have been disproved... yet, what YOU appear to believe is ALSO inaccurate and disproved. And so my question to you was, aren't YOU doing the same thing to those YOU are deriding? Just like JWs, these ex-JWs are conducting themselves in error: they base their beliefs on an understanding of what's in the Bible... which understanding was given them NOT by holy spirit, NOT by Christ... but by imperfect, fallible EARTHLING MAN... and particularly "false christs."

    But the questions you present to me regarding Adam, eating the fruit, suffering, etc., is the SAME thing: you, too, are basing your premises and understandings on what YOU received from earthling man, as well. And just like JWs don't want to hear the truth, and ex-Jws don't want to hear the truth, you apparently don't want to hear it either. And so, my question is how can you have an issue with folks who are proceeding in the same manner as you are? That, too, is hypocrisy, is it not?

    Sooo... going back to your last statement/question to me, that:

    Adam ate a fruit and all of us suffer for it...

    my response is that NO... all of us are NOT suffering because Adam ate a fruit. That is oversimplifying what occurred. And it is not the "bottom line," as many wish to think it is. Thus, I gave you the example of Eve: SHE "ate a fruit," too, right? Indeed, she ate it FIRST. Yet, all of us are not suffering because EVE "ate a fruit." And so, my point was that this, too, IS A MYTH... and that's why it cannot be logically defended. By the Bible or any other means. You then write:

    I refuse to be sucked into all that you've written because you dance around this fact

    This is an interesting comment to me: it appears that because I don't totally agree with you (or, perhaps, your bottom line), you believe me to "dancing around" some "fact." But I simply tried to answer you TRUTHFULLY, based on the FACT... that "Adam ate a fruit and all of us suffer" is NOT a fact, not entirely. That you are now wishing to end the discussion is, IMHO, not much different than the ex-JWs who refuse to discuss this subject with you at all... and JWs who refuse to discuss anything with anyone who doesn't agree with them.

    and continue making comments that are way off line from the point...

    But I AM on point, dear one, the point YOU raised: how can folks continue to try and use the Bible to defend things that have been disproven. My point was that they CAN'T... and why: because they receive what they know about the Bible from imperfect, infallible earthling man... who himself is "blind," instead of from the One about whom such things are ABOUT, the who, by means of holy spirit... grants EYESALVE so as to SEE what is TRUE. And thus, what these know, believe, understand and perceive... is FALSE. And you cannot defend a false premise (which is one of the reasons that the "light" of the WTBTS keeps changing).

    I hope you have peace also, but your replies are only strengthening my point of contention...

    Well, if you WISH your point of contention to be strengthened, it most probably won't matter what ANYONE says. If, however, you want your questions answered TRUTHFULLY, then perhaps you'll condescend to take a minute or two from this point and FULLY read what I have responded to you. Please know that this lack of wanting to read... fully... is one the reasons earthling man is often misled. Because they consider reading a "chore," they skip sentences, misread or read over words, disregard what they don't understand instead of asking/searching for clarification or, for a good many, just prefer someone else to tell them what it says. I am not knocking this entirely, as I am guilty of this, as well (I am SO tired of reading case books - I could almost scream!!).

    When it is IMPORTANT to me, however, I tend to read EVERY word. No matter how small, and if it's one I don't understand, I look it up. Why? Because... supposedly... I TRULY want to know what it says and understand what it means. It's IMPORANT to me. I cannot TELL you, however, how many people think the Bible "says" such and so, and it says NO SUCH THING. Or... that it doesn't say something, when it does. I cannot tell you how many people have said to me, "I've read the entire Bible." My response would be, great... but did you truly UNDERSTAND all that you read? Or did you let what it said get lost among all of the other pre-conceived ideas already in your mind and heart? And when you needed clarification... TO WHOM DID YOU GO FOR IT? Others of earthling man... or to the SOURCE of most of what's written there?

    Because... IF these had TRULY read the Bible, they would KNOW that ACCORDING TO THE BIBLE... IT IS NOT GOD'S WORD. NOWHERE... does the Bible say that it is. It DOES, however, tell us EXACTLY what (or rather, WHO), God's Word IS. And ACCORDING TO THE BIBLE... IT IS NOT WHAT WE SHOULD BE "SEARCHING." THE BIBLE... says this.

    And that was another of the points I was trying to make, that those who try to defend the Bible are going to lose. Because it is indefensible, given the many versions, mistranslations, mistransliterations, tampering, etc. etc., etc. A false premise CANNOT be logically defended... and those who put their faith in the Bible... are putting their faith... in a primarily false premise.

    Where they SHOULD put their faith is IN THE ONE WHOM THE BIBLE SPEAKS ABOUT. And nothing and no other. But they don't get this because they still adhere to the Law, and/or follow those who live by the Law, and/or need to see law "written on stone tablets." This is because they have not yet had the NEW law... written ON THEIR HEARTS... by the One whom THE BIBLE says will write it... and whom THE BIBLE says... they should follow.

    So, to summarize:

    1. As a NON-Bible Believer, my response is that those who try to defend the Bible WILL fail because what they believe the Bible to BE... and thus, what they believe to Bible to SAY... FALSE.

    2. In addition, if YOU believe false teachings and doctrines, based on what YOU believe the Bible to say (and I refer to what YOU appear to believe is the reason we suffer... "Adam ate a fruit"... then you are in the SAME position as those you are now calling to task.

    Again, I bid you the GREATEST of peace, and I remain,

    Your servant and a slave of Christ.

    SA

  • MissingLink
    MissingLink

    RealOne wrote

    the Bible is a good guide on how to live your life. where else can you find so much love and compassion?

    That is hilarious! Have you looked at the OT? If that god were on earth today he'd be in jail on hundreds of separate charges including genocide, murder, conspiracy to murder, etc...

    How about the loving laws like "if a child is disobedient he should be put to death". Love and compassion? Really? How about when one person screws up and their entire family is punished. "I don't even like uncle Ruben, why are you people stoning me?"

    Don't tell me Jesus changed this either. The guy who did all those evil things in the OT is the same guy that Jesus worshiped. Jesus said if you know god, then you know him - they were in agreement (or the same person depending on your interpretation). At the very least - guilt by association. I know Jesus' message was for change, but he never denounced the old laws or the guy who made them up.

  • AGuest
    AGuest

    May you have peace!

    Please permit me to say that you are in error. You said:

    The guy who did all those evil things in the OT is the same guy that Jesus worshiped.

    Actually, this is not true. First, all that was written in the OT is not accurate. Thus, Jeremiah prophesied that the "stylus of the secretaries has worked in sheer falsehood." And that is one of the reasons my Lord came to the physical realm, to "bear witness to the TRUTH" about the Most Holy One of Israel, His God and Father, and mine... JAH of Armies. He bore this witness by what he said... and did.

    Jesus said if you know god, then you know him - they were in agreement (or the same person depending on your interpretation).

    Actually, my Lord said that if you knew HIM, Christ... you would know God. Please note, I am not picking at straws here: if you take the verse the way you've stated it here, it would appear that my Lord is the same as the vengeful, aggressive, quick to judge "god" invented by Israel to build up respect from their enemies, which "god" is portrayed in the OT. However, it is just the opposite: GOD... is merciful, slow to anger and abundant in loving kindness... just as my LORD demonstrated. And all the good that HE (Christ) knew, taught and practiced... HE learned... from God ("Just as I observed the Father doing, so I do also" - "I do nothing of my own initiative, but just as the Father taught me" - "My Father keeps working, so I keep working").

    Thus, if you want to know what kind of "person" the Most Holy One of Israel like, you only need look at His "image"... "the exact representation of His very being"... the Holy One of Israel, Christ... and not vice versa. Christ is the image of God; not the other way around.

    At the very least - guilt by association.

    Perhaps... if your depiction were accurate. It is seriously inaccurate, however, and one of the very ways that false doctrines... and false knowledge about God... come into existence. Because people [such as yourself, in this instance] take what they THINK the Bible says, or verses they THINK say such and so... and quote them as fact. Your statement above is NOT true, however: my Lord did NOT say that if you know God... you know him. He said the opposite which is a significant difference and the way you've quoted him is actually quite misleading.

    I know Jesus' message was for change, but he never denounced the old laws or the guy who made them up.

    Actually, my Lord's message was NOT for "change," at least, not from the old Law. It was message for love and truth... without hypocrisy. The old Law had this; it was perfect. The PROBLEM is that for millenia people have used the old Law to look at... and judge... others. The PURPOSE of the old Law, however, was for a person to look at him or her SELF... and try not to transgress against another... and when they did, to ask for FORGIVENESS. Contrastly, when someone DID trangress, the PURPOSE of the old Law was for the one offended... to FORGIVE. Israel, however, missed this point... and most today miss it, also.

    Thus, the problem wasn't with the old Law, but with how people USED it (i.e., to judge, dominate and oppress others rather than look at themselves - which many still do down to this day). In addition, the result of the old Law was death - my Lord did not remove the old Law, but FULFILLED it, so that it was done away with. In its place, he instituted a NEW Law... the result of which is life... and which we are to use to SURPASS the decrees of the old law... through LOVE, MERCY and FORGIVENESS. That is how WE fulfill BOTH laws, and particularly the new one. Because LOVE... "covers a multitude of transgressions," and "there is no law against" love.

    Again, Israel missed this point... which is why Christ came... to SHOW us... because, obviously... we miss the point, too!

    I will ask you, therefore, and others, to please take care when you deign to "quote" the Bible. Please make sure that what you are quoting is accurate, and that your application is correct. This is important because, unfortunately, there are many who will take what you state as being fact, and accurate, when it is not. Otherwise, you are NO DIFFERENT than the false religious leaders and other hypocrites that you are taking issue with and your denunciation of them... is hypocrisy.

    I bid you the greatest of peace.

    A slave of Christ,

    SA

  • berylblue
    berylblue
    only believers understand the Bible because it was written for belivers.

    One could also say that only fools believe the Bible because it was written for fools.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit