This rubbish was greeted with enthusiasm from the congregation. They loved the way the Society mentioned "it is an interesting possiblity" the first resurrection happened in 1918, little do they know it had been an established fact before in their literature.
Also, the conductor mentioned "Now we leave the basic teachings and go into the more profound subjects in the Bible". Didn't their own magazine mention the Scriptures did not teach this? And just because the arguments are erratic, it does not mean they are profound either.