I didn't hear it, but I heard about it:
The second Circuit Assembly after I DAed my [then] wife was involved in an interview to do with living in a divided home, and stated that I wasn't supporting her. Folks started approaching my family, afterwards, commiserating with how bad I had turned out!
This was on the background of my continuing to pay everything and providing all the running costs for the car that I had bought her to Pioneer in. She had recently taken a few hours of a parttime job, which I had encouraged her to keep for herself for her own treats, as there hadn't been much slack in the income when I was the only household earner.
While it has nothing to do with the experience, the followup to the story is that she later started squirrelling away hundreds of pounds of money with her parents, with their full consent (obviously). There was no reason for it, as there had never been any indication from me that I would ever leave her destitute if we ever broke up (quite the reverse). It seems that she wanted to make sure she came out on top with at least half of everything and her own little nestegg.
As it happened I left her with the home and all the contents and continued to pay all the bills for the next six months, and the rent and rate for a further six months. I also took all the debt, and there were no savings to split (though I later cashed in a joint life insurance policy that I had taken out, and split the proceeds). I look back and think I was a bl**dy idiot, but at least I knew I did all I possibly could to make her comfortable and reduce the effects of the decision that I had made to DA. Twisted logic? You betcha!