Article on Watchtower website discusses child molestors

by expatbrit 12 Replies latest jw friends

  • expatbrit
    expatbrit

    The article on the Watchtower website entitled "Let Us Abhor What Is Wicked" comments fairly extensively on child molestors both before becoming JW's and while they are JW's.

    Here are the relevant paragraphs:

    For a man who was a child molester before he was baptized, there may be another consequence. When he learns the truth, he repents and turns around, not bringing that cruel sin into the congregation. He may thereafter make fine progress, completely overcome his wrong impulses, and even be inclined to 'reach out' for a responsible position in the congregation. What, though, if he still has to live down notoriety in the community as a former child molester? Would he "be irreprehensible, . . . have a fine testimony from people on the outside, . . . [be] free from accusation"? (1 Timothy 3:1-7, 10; Titus 1:7) No, he would not. Hence, he would not qualify for congregation privileges.

    Under the sub-heading "What Of A Child Molestor", they have the following to say (highlighting is mine):

    What if a baptized adult Christian sexually molests a child? Is the sinner so wicked that Jehovah will never forgive him? Not necessarily so. Jesus said that 'blasphemy against the holy spirit' was unforgivable. And Paul said that there is no sacrifice for sins left for one who practices sin willfully despite knowing the truth. (Luke 12:10; Hebrews 10:26, 27) But nowhere does the Bible say that an adult Christian who sexually abuses a child—whether incestuously or otherwise—cannot be forgiven. Indeed, his sins can be washed clean if he repents sincerely from the heart and turns his conduct around. However, he may still have to struggle with the wrong fleshly impulses he cultivated. (Ephesians 1:7) And there may be consequences that he cannot avoid.

    Depending on the law of the land where he lives, the molester may well have to serve a prison term or face other sanctions from the State. The congregation will not protect him from this. Moreover, the man has revealed a serious weakness that henceforth will have to be taken into account. If he seems to be repentant, he will be encouraged to make spiritual progress, share in the field service, even have parts in the Theocratic Ministry School and nonteaching parts in the Service Meeting. This does not mean, though, that he will qualify to serve in a position of responsibility in the congregation. What are the Scriptural reasons for this?

    For one thing, an elder must be "self-controlled." (Titus 1:8) True, none of us have perfect self-control. (Romans 7:21-25) But a dedicated adult Christian who falls into the sin of child sexual abuse reveals an unnatural fleshly weakness. Experience has shown that such an adult may well molest other children. True, not every child molester repeats the sin, but many do. And the congregation cannot read hearts to tell who is and who is not liable to molest children again. (Jeremiah 17:9) Hence, Paul's counsel to Timothy applies with special force in the case of baptized adults who have molested children: "Never lay your hands hastily upon any man; neither be a sharer in the sins of others." (1 Timothy 5:22) For the protection of our children, a man known to have been a child molester does not qualify for a responsible position in the congregation. Moreover, he cannot be a pioneer or serve in any other special, full-time service.—Compare the principle at Exodus 21:28, 29.

    Some may ask, 'Have not some committed other types of sin and apparently repented, only to repeat their sin later?' Yes, that has happened, but there are other factors to consider. If, for example, an individual makes immoral advances to another adult, the adult should be able to resist his or her advances. Children are much easier to deceive, confuse, or terrorize. The Bible speaks of a child's lack of wisdom. (Proverbs 22:15; 1 Corinthians 13:11) Jesus used children as an example of humble innocence. (Matthew 18:4; Luke 18:16, 17) The innocence of a child includes a complete lack of experience. Most children are open, eager to please, and thus vulnerable to abuse by a scheming adult whom they know and trust. Therefore, the congregation has a responsibility before Jehovah to protect its children.

    Well-trained children learn to obey and honor their parents, the elders, and other adults. (Ephesians 6:1, 2; 1 Timothy 5:1, 2; Hebrews 13:7) It would be a shocking perversion if one of these authority figures were to misuse that child's innocent trust so as to seduce or force him or her to submit to sexual acts. Those who have been sexually molested in this way often struggle for years to overcome the resulting emotional trauma. Hence, a child molester is subject to severe congregational discipline and restrictions. It is not his status as an authority figure that should be of concern but, rather, the unblemished purity of the congregation.—1 Corinthians 5:6; 2 Peter 3:14.

    If a child molester sincerely repents, he will recognize the wisdom of applying Bible principles. If he truly learns to abhor what is wicked, he will despise what he did and struggle to avoid repeating his sin. (Proverbs 8:13; Romans 12:9) Further, he will surely thank Jehovah for the greatness of His love, as a result of which a repentant sinner, such as he is, can still worship our holy God and hope to be among "the upright" who will reside on earth forever.—Proverbs 2:21.

    Now, I'm shaking my head on a number of points here, but I think I'll shutup for now.

    What do you think of this?

    The full article is here: http://www.watchtower.org/library/w/1997/1/1/article_01.htm

    Expatbrit

  • Scully
    Scully

    Where to begin.... where to begin....

    But nowhere does the Bible say that an adult Christian who sexually abuses a child—whether incestuously or otherwise—cannot be forgiven.

    This completely baffles me. So what they are saying is that because the congregation deems an adult Christian™ who sexually abuses children to be deserving of forgiveness, the victims and their families who have been harmed should also extend forgiveness?? Does that mean anyone who chooses to seek legal recourse against a Christian™ for sexually abusing them, but who has been "forgiven" by the congregation (ie, reinstated after being disfellowshipped, or having restrictions removed after being put on reproof) will be viewed as "going against God's Organization™"?

    If he seems to be repentant, he will be encouraged to make spiritual progress, share in the field service, even have parts in the Theocratic Ministry School and nonteaching parts in the Service Meeting.
    For the protection of our children, a man known to have been a child molester does not qualify for a responsible position in the congregation. Moreover, he cannot be a pioneer or serve in any other special, full-time service.

    So they are saying that it's OK for "a man known to have been a child molester" to have a "share in the field service". Is that because worldly children don't deserve to be protected from child molesting JWs? Does the Organization only care about "our children"??

    How stupid is it that a child molester is not allowed to have "teaching parts in the Service Meeting", but they are allowed to go out and "teach" people in their homes and on their doorsteps?

    Plus the fact that ANY JW who qualifies to go house-to-house can do so for as many hours per month as they want, without having to submit an application for pioneer service, makes that last highlighted portion a complete joke.

    And don't get me started on the "JW child molesters are always accompanied by another member of the congregation" schpiel. I think I speak for every sane person when I say that I wouldn't want the likes of Paul Bernardo, Clifford Olsen or Charles Manson at my door, even if they were accompanied by dozens of armed guards. The safety of my family is the issue, and I don't want child abusing criminals at my door or at the doors of any member of my community, accompanied or not.

    Love, Scully

  • teenyuck
    teenyuck

    They are simply interested in bringing in *anyone*. Even molestors. They qualify as pond scum.

    We all know that the recidivism rate for this crime is very high. They put every child at risk.

  • Gopher
    Gopher

    the molester may well have to serve a prison term or face other sanctions from the State. The congregation will not protect him from this.

    Very tricky wording -- the "congregation will not protect him"... but the WT society may spend tens of thousands in your defense if you are accused of such acts against children who didn't meet the proper "two eyewitness" requirement. Basically they are lying here.

    If he seems to be repentant, he will be encouraged to make spiritual progress, share in the field service, even have parts

    What the hell? Who judges whether he "seems to be repentant"? Why not let the courts of the land deal with him. He'll have plenty of time to be "repentant" when behind bars.

    So they'll let a known child molestor look like an "example" to the congregation by using him in their public ministry and certain meeting parts? What about the victims and their families? They are forever affected by the lowest kind of behavior on the part of this abuser, and now they have to watch him be used as if he's some sort of EXAMPLE?

    The WT Society: building their reputation on the backs of the poor, innocent victims.

  • Celia
    Celia

    It's pathetic, disgusting. Nothing is said about the horror the children have been through --- but we must forgive the "repentant" sinner --- where can I find the vomiting emoticon ?

  • Swan
    Swan

    Is it just me or is this really confusing? They talk about forgiveness but then they talk about not forgiving. Doesn't forgiveness imply a renewal of trust? Maybe I'm just tired today, but it seems contradictory. Maybe someone could explain it better to me.

    Thanks.

    Tammy

  • rocketman
    rocketman

    Such articles were always insufficient and had to be followed up by letters to elders. The articles are confusing, and of course we all know the areas in which they are lacking.

  • Scully
    Scully

    gopher writes:

    but the WT society may spend tens of thousands in your defense if you are accused of such acts against children who didn't meet the proper "two eyewitness" requirement.

    Excellent point, and one that deserves to be investigated further. Just how much is spent (or claimed to have been spent) by the WTS, using fleece donations from "the flock", defending paedophiles and those who harbour paedophiles and trying to shield them from justice??

    Love, Scully

  • cruzanheart
    cruzanheart

    This article was very carefully written and run past the Legal Department several times before it was posted. They are trying to sound virtuous and upright, but all the points made before my post show up the areas where they are craftily creating loopholes.

    Also, just because they SAY they're doing something doesn't mean it's being done by the congregations. I couldn't care less what they're saying on their website, or from the platform, or in the Watchtower because those political forums do not reflect what the elders in the congregations are actually doing.

    "By their works you shall know them."

    Nina

  • rocketman
    rocketman

    Good point Nina. They can write anything they want. The proof is in the actions. They talk a pretty good game at times. But talk, as they say, is cheap.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit