MemberPostViewed: times
ThiChi  The US Sedition Act Appropriate Today?


Is the Sedition Act appropriate today? Now that we are at war, should this Act be used to address some that oppose the War? This question was put to me, I now ask for your comments…….
16 May, 1918
The U.S. Sedition Act

United States, Statutes at Large, Washington, D.C., 1918, Vol. XL, pp 553 ff. A portion of the amendment to Section 3 of the Espionage Act of June 15, 1917.SECTION 3.

Whoever, when the United States is at war, shall willfully make or convey false reports or false statements with intent to interfere with the operation or success of the military or naval forces of the United States, or to promote the success of its enemies, or shall willfully make or convey false reports, or false statements, . . . or incite insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty, in the military or naval forces of the United States, or shall willfully obstruct . . . the recruiting or enlistment service of the United States, or . . . shall willfully utter, print, write, or publish any disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language about the form of government of the United States, or the Constitution of the United States, or the military or naval forces of the United States . . . or shall willfully display the flag of any foreign enemy, or shall willfully . . . urge, incite, or advocate any curtailment of production . . . or advocate, teach, defend, or suggest the doing of any of the acts or things in this section enumerated and whoever shall by word or act support or favor the cause of any country with which the United States is at war or by word or act oppose the cause of the United States therein, shall be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment for not more than twenty years, or both....
IP: ERyI+3BH6qgKdQvu by ThiChi: Correct formatting
GamalielRe: The US Sedition Act Appropriate Today?

ThiChi,

The document has been a real embarrassment to the United States. Only the most unpatriotic person would recommend that it be enforced. (imo)

Gamaliel 
IP: N248pT9r/yhgnGjr
SatanusRe: The US Sedition Act Appropriate Today?

What do you think, tichi?

SS
IP: 6KxZdDQewL9Zp/ev
Nathan NatasRe: The US Sedition Act Appropriate Today?

ThiChi,

I support the enforcement of the Sedition Act.

I support the liberation of Iraq.

I support the US Military.
IP: 1RLcZ9iDCYQZkYQZ
GopherRe: The US Sedition Act Appropriate Today?

Very interesting idea. 1918 -- World War 1 is the setting for this Sedition Act.

It seems like parts of run counter to the First Amendment protection of free speech. However, we all know there ARE reasonable limits to free speech. (Like the Supreme Court justice once said, you are not free to yell "fire" in a crowded theater and thus cause a public danger.)

So should the anti-war crowd, should they be suppressed if found in violation of the Sedition Act? To me it depends on the actual danger posed by their words. I don't know that they do. If they are found to be "in cahoots" with the enemy, then I say throw the book at them.

Some say that these antiwar protests give comfort and aid to the enemy, in this case Saddam Hussein. I wonder if Saddam really follows what goes on in the Western press? Most of the protesters are saying Iraq ought to be disarmed, just that this war isn't the way. Although I may not agree with that view, I think their saying so is well within their rights as Americans.
IP: 2OJ4tD2NJux4m1sd
GamalielRe: The US Sedition Act Appropriate Today?

Some good background history on the Sedition Act:

http://www.constitution.org/col/foreign_rights.htm

IP: N248pT9r/yhgnGjr
ThiChiRe: The US Sedition Act Appropriate Today?

G:

You got it backwards…….It was to deal with unpatriotic activities, information that proved to be false or an obstruction to the US

It really started in the 1800s under Adams who used it very well....
IP: ERyI+3BH6qgKdQvu by ThiChi: Correct formatting
by ThiChi: Correct formatting
by ThiChi: Correct formatting
hillary_stepRe: The US Sedition Act Appropriate Today?

A spokesman for the White House told CNN yesterday that the fact that weapons of mass destruction had not yet been found as yet in Iraq was 'superfluous' ( to use his words ) to the invasion issue and that this was all about the liberation of the Iraqi people.

Considering that WMD and a linkage between the Iraqi Government and 9/11 terrorist action were the stated war ticket and both of which are now presumably superfluous to invasion requirement, I consider this spokesman’s comment seditious toward truth…lol

HS
IP: XJt2DshDFuXY/UdA
ThiChiRe: The US Sedition Act Appropriate Today?

SS: I asked you first…..

IP: ERyI+3BH6qgKdQvu
mustangRe: The US Sedition Act Appropriate Today?

Thi Chi,

Most people read the Sedition Act TOTALLY WRONG. There is very little in it that applies to wAR pROTESTERS as we know them.

For the purposes of this question I make the following assumption:

A wAR pROTESTER is one who does no more than hold a sign and march in some circular path in front of some Federal installation.

(A Naval Officer is reviewing this and generally agrees. There is some thought that TECHNICALLY any of the WP’s that BLOCK TRAFFIC could be construed as interfering with TROOP MOVEMENTS.)

(Also, these people that are defecating in public are grossly offensive and their message really sucks, no matter what it is. I don’t see the MESSAGE @ this point, only Indecent Exposure, that deserves Prosecution.)

WP = wAR pROTESTER (I don’t agree with them, but they do have rights. This has been established. If they go too far, they could also go to PRISON. This too, has been established.)

1) How many WP’s interfere with a troop movement?

2) How many WP’s are trying to convince someone to NOT TO ENLIST, MUTINY, DESERT or REFUSE TO PERFORM THEIR DUTY?

Generally, next to none!!!

There are some other aspects here that perhaps run counter to Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Press. These "gray areas" have been generally dealt with in other circumstances during TWO World Wars, the Korean Conflict and Vietnam since the Sedition Act’s inception. I am not too worried about their "over-interpretation".

However, there are advocates within the military who voice the opinion that we should use such as the Sedition Act against the most unruly of the WP’s WHO CAN BE SHOWN TO PHYSICALLY INTERFERE AND GO BEYOND MERE PROTEST; these should be Prosecuted. Their punishment should be minimal. Once released, these people will have to deal with a FEDERAL CRIMINAL RECORD for the rest of their life and career’s.  This is more serious than a parking ticket.

I find that most WP’s are poorly informed. Protest at your own risk: You pays your money and takes your chances :)

Mustang
IP: U/fOLHuuCgjpu3mo by mustang: Correct formatting
ThiChiRe: Re: The US Sedition Act Appropriate Today?

HS:

Who stated this and when? I would like to read the entire transcript. I believe you probably took what was said out of context.

Secondly, it has been proven that Iraq has banned weapons under UN Resolutions. Plus, I bet you have not read Inspector Blix' final report to the UN issued last Friday....

This is a “case in point” to #1

IP: ERyI+3BH6qgKdQvu by ThiChi: Correct formatting
by ThiChi: Correct formatting
by ThiChi: Correct formatting
by ThiChi: Correct formatting
by ThiChi: Correct formatting
by ThiChi: Correct formatting
by ThiChi: Correct formatting
ThiChiRe: The US Sedition Act Appropriate Today?

Mustang:

Mustang:

Who said anything about war protesters? You should read  who have been prosecuted under this Act,

IP: ERyI+3BH6qgKdQvu by ThiChi: Correct formatting
GamalielRe: The US Sedition Act Appropriate Today?

As is the case with many laws, their intent and use is as important as the exact wording. Knowing the intent and use of the Sedition Act, would make it difficult to trust anyone promoting its use. The premise is that we should stop being American and stop trusting Democracy during a period of war. All the necessary precautions for handling sedition during war are already in place without the Sedition Act. For that reason alone the act should be looked upon suspiciously as an act of sedition against America and democracy. It supposedly gives the United States the legal right to act (during war) in the same manner that Hitler, Stalin, Saddam, and others have acted in the face of opposition. 

The following might be of interest. It was a comment about US Senate Bill 1510.

This bill is similar to the one Adolf Hitler pushed through the Reichstag after the Reichstag fire in the early 1930's. German Jews, horrified by the chaos in Germany after the fire, supported Hitler's legislation - then found he could (and planned to) use it against them. 

This is worse legislation than the Sedition Laws of the 1790's, later declared unconstitutional and leading to the end of John Adams' presidency. 

Gamaliel
IP: N248pT9r/yhgnGjr
ThiChiRe: Re: The US Sedition Act Appropriate Today?

Here are the premises I support:

  1. Deliberate misinformation and lies are wrong
  2. Civil obstruction, beyond speech, after the war has started should be addressed.
  3. Any act that compromises the safety of our troops should be addressed.

IP: ERyI+3BH6qgKdQvu
ThiChiRe: Re: The US Sedition Act Appropriate Today?

“This is worse legislation than the Sedition Laws of the 1790's, later declared unconstitutional and leading to the end of John Adams' presidency. “

1. This did not end Adam's presidency. In fact his helped his "numbers" go up!

2. The Sedition Act has never been declared unconstitutional. In fact,durning the 1800s, it was not yet established that the High Court could declare federal acts unconstitutional…..

IP: ERyI+3BH6qgKdQvu by ThiChi: Correct formatting
by ThiChi: Correct formatting
by ThiChi: Correct formatting
GamalielRe: The US Sedition Act Appropriate Today?

ThiChi,

Here are the premises I support:

  1. Deliberate misinformation and lies are wrong
  2. Civil obstruction, beyond speech, after the war has started should be addressed.
  3. Any act that compromises the safety of our troops should be addressed.

I thought you supported Bush!?!?!?

Gamaliel
IP: N248pT9r/yhgnGjr by Gamaliel: Breaking the law
ThiChiRe: Re: The US Sedition Act Appropriate Today?
???? WHo said I don't? And who said that Bush supports this Act?
IP: ERyI+3BH6qgKdQvu
SatanusRe: The US Sedition Act Appropriate Today?

It's funny how things can be used, depending on who has the most power.  Govt reps lied about iraq's weapons: aluminim tubes, uranium acquisitions from africa, iraqi connections to al queda- 
Deliberate misinformation and lies are wrong

War (excuse me, military action) based on false premises is now seeing young american soldiers killed, in extreme fatigue, and likely in danger-
Any act that compromises the safety of our troops should be addressed.

Puzzled SS
IP: 6KxZdDQewL9Zp/ev
ThiChiRe: The US Sedition Act Appropriate Today?

""Govt reps lied about iraq's weapons: aluminim tubes, uranium acquisitions from africa, iraqi connections to al queda-  ""

Not true! Did you read Blix's final report to the UN? Or Iraq's POW fingering al queda? Or the many reports that fly in the face of your claims?
IP: ERyI+3BH6qgKdQvu
happy manRe: The US Sedition Act Appropriate Today?

missinformation and lies are wrong

If  so all countrys how go out in war are lier, as we all now the truth is the first wicktim in war.

We se this evry evning in the news,if you dont  I rekomend you to putt on better glasses.

Missinformation is a bigg part of modern war taktik, grow upp my friend.

widh love from HM

 

 
IP: 5FQmsSPNA7MExFD6