Ruby456
oh c'me on OrphanCrow - I have done all my reading re the commission and stand by my concerns. I don't like to see the shit kicked out of people even if they deserve it - so we are very different.
I still think there should be proper representation for both parties. This is coming across like Jesus being questioned before the Sanhedrin but whats more this is even worse as it is public whereas that was in private. edit: Plus Jesus could stand his own better as he was what we would today consider middle class from a sociological perspective whereas these elders who are being questioned are probably not even that, having probably left school at 16-18.
So - why is the JC from the elders not public (like the bible want it)?
So - where is the proper representation for both parties in a JC?
Why can a JC not be filmed? Why must be the documents of a JC destroyed?
Why can't I have a lawyer or other person with me in a JC - when the elders are 3 persons?
Because, the elders are thinking, that it is OK in this way they handle it.
So they have to accept, that it is for the Royal Commission also OK the way, they doing it.
@ Ruby456:
This does not mean, that I don't like you. Thanks for posting so openly what you think.
For me only this one point you wrote is worthy of discussion. :-)
edit:
*** hb p. 21 You Have the Right to Choose ***Of course, Christians agree with laws or court action to prevent child abuse or neglect.