It looks so simple. What about songs like Laud our God.
Or dark days are here... man lives in fear
all thanks must go to my anonymous source.. .
full set: http://imgur.com/a/bwl52.
.
It looks so simple. What about songs like Laud our God.
Or dark days are here... man lives in fear
since isis is killing people in the middle east and apparently they are invaded the rest of the earth with their hateful beliefs should we as americans take the steps necessary to amend the constitution to say something along the lines of .
congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion except in regards to islam, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof except in regards to islam; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble except in regards to islam, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.. .
thoughts?
Purposely.
since isis is killing people in the middle east and apparently they are invaded the rest of the earth with their hateful beliefs should we as americans take the steps necessary to amend the constitution to say something along the lines of .
congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion except in regards to islam, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof except in regards to islam; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble except in regards to islam, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.. .
thoughts?
Simon your being hypocritical. You feel free to insult and throw little jabs at any and everyone you chose. People who agree with you are allowed to do the same. Someone does it to you and you get mad or want to request someone learn manners? What about your manners? Come on BRO.
since isis is killing people in the middle east and apparently they are invaded the rest of the earth with their hateful beliefs should we as americans take the steps necessary to amend the constitution to say something along the lines of .
congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion except in regards to islam, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof except in regards to islam; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble except in regards to islam, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.. .
thoughts?
Simon you will know when I think my point has been made. Till then just shut up and enjoy the ride
since isis is killing people in the middle east and apparently they are invaded the rest of the earth with their hateful beliefs should we as americans take the steps necessary to amend the constitution to say something along the lines of .
congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion except in regards to islam, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof except in regards to islam; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble except in regards to islam, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.. .
thoughts?
So is it now bad to use points that you made to support your opinion in another thread. I figure it will be easier for people to say how they truly feel if they are not disagreeing with the site owner. You know the old saying To learn who rules over you ... etc...
since isis is killing people in the middle east and apparently they are invaded the rest of the earth with their hateful beliefs should we as americans take the steps necessary to amend the constitution to say something along the lines of .
congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion except in regards to islam, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof except in regards to islam; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble except in regards to islam, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.. .
thoughts?
since isis is killing people in the middle east and apparently they are invaded the rest of the earth with their hateful beliefs should we as americans take the steps necessary to amend the constitution to say something along the lines of .
congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion except in regards to islam, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof except in regards to islam; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble except in regards to islam, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.. .
thoughts?
You do realize that you have once again without a doubt have shown many people here JUUUST what kind of person you are? I like it!!!
Anyway back to the topic.
Yo do realize it is not illegal to be a part of the KKK. Many consider them to be a part of the Chrisitian religion. They are free to hold those beliefs have meetings and march around passing out pamphlets. However when they act upon those beliefs and do injury to other people they break other laws and in turn suffer consequences.
Would I support their right to believe what they want to believe, of course I would. I do not have to like, but I haev to allow them the freedom to have their beliefs.
since isis is killing people in the middle east and apparently they are invaded the rest of the earth with their hateful beliefs should we as americans take the steps necessary to amend the constitution to say something along the lines of .
congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion except in regards to islam, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof except in regards to islam; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble except in regards to islam, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.. .
thoughts?
Since ISIS is killing people in the Middle East and apparently they are invaded the rest of the earth with their hateful beliefs should we as AMERICANS take the steps necessary to amend the constitution to say something along the lines of
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion except in regards to Islam, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof except in regards to Islam; or abridging the freedom of speech , or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble except in regards to Islam, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Thoughts?
throughout several past threads various posters have emphatically made the point that countries like great britian, united states, france etc.
basically countries where white people exist, are to blame for the poverty in many other third world nations.
some have even went so far as to suggest that the first world is to blame for all third world conditions.. i often see excuses such as these for why a country refuses to provide clean water, some food and basic sanitation for its people:.
Qcmbr - how about if I show you similar numbers for deaths for every single Latin American country or african country where 10 -30% of the populations were slaughterd or made into slaves? Please tell me what makes this example extreme?
Britian and France and Portugal carried out similar murderous sprees everywhere they went?
Look at the Native AMericans who were nearly wiped out. I would love for you to take your argument to them and explain hwo the decimation of their people had positive effects. This from someone who grew up in Rhodesia of all places.
Something tells me every nation that was invaded and had people enslaved would have prefered to have been left alone to see what they could have become on their own. What is worse they deserved that option.
Its like saying what it the natives of Zimbabwe would have come into your home and raped your mother and sisters and Aunts and killed your father then turned around and enslaved you all. Then later on saidm, "Hey there are some benefits to this so don't worry about it."
throughout several past threads various posters have emphatically made the point that countries like great britian, united states, france etc.
basically countries where white people exist, are to blame for the poverty in many other third world nations.
some have even went so far as to suggest that the first world is to blame for all third world conditions.. i often see excuses such as these for why a country refuses to provide clean water, some food and basic sanitation for its people:.
"Confused - the difference in my viewpoint is that countries are responsible for themselves - we can't keep excusing their failure to progress using victim language. I think people are more empowered than that."
How are they responsible for themselves when other countries bomb them into the stone age or forcibly take their resources? I ask again you are telling me that Congo would have been better of having 50% of their poopulation murdered and another 10% rendered useless than if they had been left alone to continue they way the were???
PLEASE FOR THE LAST TIME ANSWER THIS QUESTION.
=================================
trillaz - "Western money is no longer dependent on a tangible backing. I'm sure any country would like to do the same to its citizens but doing that Today in a 3rd world country would be seen as a human rights violation."
you see this type of post here shows an individual who has an understanding of history and how the world actually works and not revisionist historians who gloss over every aspect of history to make the powers that be look squeaky clean.
" the US made it illegal for citizens to hold amounts of gold."
it also amazes me how easy the government changes the rules whenever they like