The present Governing Body seems to have never been well grounded in their own doctrines.
It's one of the areas that they've flip-flopped over in recent years. Maybe they can't make their own minds up whether they will get an early ticket out or not! Perhaps that's one of the issues that has had the GB divided and where AMIII had a view that lost him his position? Who knows.
One thing is certain: A group like the current GB, with some members who have been there for decades (raised on the old GB1.0's foundations) and some newly arrived, and with quite a wide age range, are unlikely to be completely unified on what they think is about to happen in the run-up to the GT and Armageddon, even if outwardly they claim they are (being "united by holy spirit", of course!)
I think we can expect to see a lot more changes that seem erratic or out of the blue, like the ministry changes, clothing, etc. I think there is something of an ideological power struggle going on and it's not yet clear if the GB2.0 (or GB2.5 or whatever we're up to now) have settled on what they really believe going forward.
- Anointed GB fading out and being replaced by "helpers"? Or more new "anointed"?
- Relaxing ministry and disfellowshipping and opening the doors to more? Or retreating to bunkers and hiding from the "authorities"?
- Reassuring non-JWs that Jehovah will decide in his own time and the JWs don't judge their fate? Or demanding studies move quickly and dropping any that don't "progress"?
- Building more Halls and facilities for the numbers "flooding" in? Or selling off and merging to get "better value from theocratic assets"?
- Expanding the foreign field to reach other languages? Or disbanding foreign congregations to put multiple speakers in central congregations?
We've had all those contradictory signals and more in the last 10 years or so.
As some have said, I suspect that's because they're making decisions on the fly, depending on how the "world" reacts (governments, court cases, etc). A foolish way to proceed, but inevitable when you lack your own deep-seated convictions, as seems to be the case with the post-1990s GB.
Like a lot of modern politicians, it seems with the modern incarnation of the GB, it's difficult to see what they really believe in. With GB1.0, you may have disagreed with them, but at least they (mostly) seemed to have some kind of conviction in their religion. These days, it's like the classic Groucho quote: "Those are my principles and if you don't like them... well, I have others."