When I use the odd cotton ear bud (I understand one shouldn't?) and I dig too deep in my ear, I start coughing.
I understand I'm tickling my Vagus nerve. Weird.
every brit of a certain age can recognise a morris minor by the iconic shape of its bonnet.
what most don't realise is that when alec issigonis designed the car in 1948 he had a last minute change of mind.
he realised it looked too narrow.
When I use the odd cotton ear bud (I understand one shouldn't?) and I dig too deep in my ear, I start coughing.
I understand I'm tickling my Vagus nerve. Weird.
during the gop debates donald trump said that american’s “wages [are] too high” and later said “that having a low minimum wage is not a bad thing for this country” (7:25)..
do you agree and if so why?.
my two cents on this issue; do the math.
As for your pencil analogy you have left out the cost of employing the producer which takes us right back to the issue.
If you mean by producer, it encompasses the tool manufacturers, the architects, engineers, technicians, miners, lumber jacks, supervisors, accountants and ALL the labor involved, and not just the factory floor worker though.
Floods are a natural force that's why cities are designed with drainage and flood control channels.
See: Dutch Watersnoodramp 1953 - And they're some pretty darn good engineers when it comes to dykes.
during the gop debates donald trump said that american’s “wages [are] too high” and later said “that having a low minimum wage is not a bad thing for this country” (7:25)..
do you agree and if so why?.
my two cents on this issue; do the math.
And how would such a mystical force do any correcting?
You seem to think the market is not a natural force. Let me explain:
Pick up a normal everyday item like a pencil. It consists of parts like a wooden casing, some paint, carbon on the inside, a rubber eraser on its back end, a metal holder for the eraser.
You buy this item for a negligible amount.
Now here's the trick: How much would it cost you to make one from total scratch on your own?
One dollar? Ten dollars? A hundred dollars?
It would actually cost millions of dollars.
Here's another trick: No one knows the manufacturing process of that pencil from end to end in its entirety.
From the wood being cut, to it being treated, the chemical composition of the paint, the processes involved in the manufacture of the base materials. That simple item encompasses the ingenuity and force of our entire civilization.
Think about it for a while: The market is a natural force, like the ocean, like hurricanes or any other great natural phenomena you can think of.
When humans intervene in the market through legislation like a minimum wage, one better know what one is doing because one could end up with unintended consequences. I'm not saying that it cannot be done, the Dutch have been keeping the Atlantic ocean at bay for a very long time, but what I am saying is that when you choose to impose limits on the market you better have thought this through thoroughly.
during the gop debates donald trump said that american’s “wages [are] too high” and later said “that having a low minimum wage is not a bad thing for this country” (7:25)..
do you agree and if so why?.
my two cents on this issue; do the math.
Thank you. The reply was honest. I think that things changed when corporations gained a legal identity. Even Henry Ford warned that this was a bad idea.
Well organizations go back very far and seem to be an organizing principle employed by humans. I believe a feature of global evolution.
The idea of an organization being a legal person enables organizations to outlive its founder, for example: Ford, Hewlett Packard, IBM and so on.
The problem also being unlimited liability. If a human supersedes the organization he or she is the head of, the management/workers will always be at risk and not the corporation. Now this may sound like a good idea until you have malicious litigation and so on.
BTW I'm also conflicted about the rights of corporations to some extent.
during the gop debates donald trump said that american’s “wages [are] too high” and later said “that having a low minimum wage is not a bad thing for this country” (7:25)..
do you agree and if so why?.
my two cents on this issue; do the math.
In the retail establishments where I have worked people have been forced to work "off the clock" (free labor for the company) Why should anyone have to wait until it gets worse?
I don't know. Shouldn't market forces perhaps correct it?
during the gop debates donald trump said that american’s “wages [are] too high” and later said “that having a low minimum wage is not a bad thing for this country” (7:25)..
do you agree and if so why?.
my two cents on this issue; do the math.
...you then arrest them for non-payment of bills.
WAIT A MINUTE... Are you proposing the bringing back of debtors jail?
Oh BTW the "living wage" goes back to Adam Smith.
during the gop debates donald trump said that american’s “wages [are] too high” and later said “that having a low minimum wage is not a bad thing for this country” (7:25)..
do you agree and if so why?.
my two cents on this issue; do the math.
Injustice is rampant in labor and if there are no unions it's because union organizing has been squashed by the Walmarts and Kmarts of this nation. Workers who try to organize for labor in those establishments get blacklisted and booted by their employers.
Remember this exactly what happened in England in the 19th century in the mining industry. When conditions deteriorated beyond the believable, the unions came into existence irrespective of the mining magnates bullying tactics.
during the gop debates donald trump said that american’s “wages [are] too high” and later said “that having a low minimum wage is not a bad thing for this country” (7:25)..
do you agree and if so why?.
my two cents on this issue; do the math.
I'm talking about a lower middle class wage for those who are now the working poor.
The problem being as follows: Is the wage meant for a single person, or should two adults combined be able to afford your proposed lifestyle. What about children? How many do you want the family to be able to afford? 2,3,1 or zero?
Are you proposing a multi tiered minimum wage?
during the gop debates donald trump said that american’s “wages [are] too high” and later said “that having a low minimum wage is not a bad thing for this country” (7:25)..
do you agree and if so why?.
my two cents on this issue; do the math.
So what about the capitalist argument: The market will bare - I'm ignorant of this. Please explain, using monosyllabic words and pictures ...
Ok ok... in other words supply and demand.
I don't believe people should expect the state to pay for their children, e.g. if a husband gets fired from his job, he should not be allowed to add to his brood unless he can afford to do so.
How do you discourage him? Taxation? Vasectomy? :)
during the gop debates donald trump said that american’s “wages [are] too high” and later said “that having a low minimum wage is not a bad thing for this country” (7:25)..
do you agree and if so why?.
my two cents on this issue; do the math.
...If they don't have unions like the UFCW that is because they haven't organized for one so far not because they don't need one.
Yeah sort of exactly: If injustice is rampant in labor, human beings will organize to counter it. The argument being the system seems to be working.
It is not an abstraction like "the market" but rather the marketeers, the corporate elite, who decide.
Lets just be clear: 90% of US companies have less than 19 employees.
Also 50% of all employment in the US is by small and medium businesses.