if so It was probably down to shock and confusion! I’d put money on their numbers declining in 1936
Diogenesister,
I was not there , only 5 at the time, The article calls this new light a "revelation", kind of admitting that there was no direct scriptural basis for the new light on the pulling the 'great crowd' down to earth,
It is the "not partaking part" that was left out by wt in the original assembly announcement. i believe.
There were declines in membership after 1925, 1975, both related to what happens on earth or not, I dont know about 1935.
wt writers do not always see the ramifications of traps that they walk into with such dramas. Current example is the anointed generation, last generation of partakers. absolutely wrong. additionally,
The overlap creates a surplus of partakers. They should have never linked partaking as a monopoly to the 144 000. after 1935 in the first place.