scholar

Joined

• started 4 topics
• posted 3,119 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by scholar

• 
  106

  Help with another 607 vs 587 question............

  by thraxer68 in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  ok, this is driving me nuts for whatever reason i cant get past the bolded part.

  can someone maybe explain that a little?

  if this even makes sense, im usually not t his dense, i've been reading this for ever and for some reason i keep getting thrown off track at that part.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  scholar

  AnnOMaly

  Post 1365

  Jerermiah 25:9-11 most plainly states that Judah would not only serve Babylon for seventy years but wouls also be desolate for seventy years therefore the entire population would also be in exile for that same period. Such a honest account of history is also proved by the testimony of Ezra, Daniel, Zechariah and Josephus. Jeremiah in that prophecy also decreed that the Nations would also be made to serve Babylon but their respective histories in respect to Babylon does not supply any detailed chronology or history that refer to any specific fulfillment of a definite seventy year prophecy.

  scholar JW
• 
  100

  Where did 607 come from?

  by MrFreeze in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  okay so we've obviously established on this board that 607 is not the correct date that babylon destroyed jerusalem.

  even before 1914 came around, the bible students still thought 1914 would be a pivital date.

  the only way they can gain that info is from the 7 times or w/e.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  scholar

  AnnOMaly

  Post 1379

  I have received no vision or direct revelation but Jehovah has revealed such matters to His Church, Elect, Body of Christ, Christian Congregation, Faithful and Discreet Slave and the 'celebrated WTY scholars by means of Revelation such process involves God's Inspired Word and Holy Spirit.

  The date 607 BCE is firmly established, Neo-Babylonian Chronology with some fine-tuning can be utilized in support of that date.

  The problem of indecision or uncertainty concerning 586 or 587 BCE is due to the biblical data because the celebrated WT scholars use the same biblical data arriving at a specific calender date, 607 BCE. Your problem is 'methodology' freely admitted to by Rodger's Young's article.

  scholar JW
• 
  106

  Help with another 607 vs 587 question............

  by thraxer68 in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  ok, this is driving me nuts for whatever reason i cant get past the bolded part.

  can someone maybe explain that a little?

  if this even makes sense, im usually not t his dense, i've been reading this for ever and for some reason i keep getting thrown off track at that part.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  scholar

  garyneal

  Post 1356

  The answer to your question is simply found in Jeremiah 25:9-11 where it refers quite plainly to the fact that the seventy years was a period of desolation, exile and servitude to Babylon. This view of matters conforms to what Ezra, Daniel and Zechariah had to say about the matter and is also proven by the many references to the seventy years made by Josephus.

  scholar JW
• 
  100

  Where did 607 come from?

  by MrFreeze in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  okay so we've obviously established on this board that 607 is not the correct date that babylon destroyed jerusalem.

  even before 1914 came around, the bible students still thought 1914 would be a pivital date.

  the only way they can gain that info is from the 7 times or w/e.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  scholar

  AnnOMaly

  Post 1370

  Apart from Jehovah's Witnesses and their Apologists there remains the most Supreme supporter of 607 BCE for the Fall and that is no less than the Great Chronologist and Timekeeper, Jehovah God. It matters little if even all the scholars in the world do not recognize this sacred date because this date is firmly established upon the God's Infallible Word, Secular History and Neo-Babylonian Chronology with a slight adjustment of twenty years.

  You and all fellow apostates and higher critics have one big problem and that is your inability to determine with absolute certainty a precise calender year for the Fall and until you and your 'suspects' can do this then your credibility is nought. You have a lot of work to do!

  scholar JW
• 
  106

  Help with another 607 vs 587 question............

  by thraxer68 in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  ok, this is driving me nuts for whatever reason i cant get past the bolded part.

  can someone maybe explain that a little?

  if this even makes sense, im usually not t his dense, i've been reading this for ever and for some reason i keep getting thrown off track at that part.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  scholar

  AnnOMaly

  Post 1369

  None of those possibilities accord with Scripture and history for these are simply interpretations which are contradictory and meaningless. It seems that you regard Jeremiah as silly whern he simply prophesied that Judah would lie desolate for seventy years just as those false prophets in his day made similar accusations.

  scholar JW
• 
  106

  Help with another 607 vs 587 question............

  by thraxer68 in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  ok, this is driving me nuts for whatever reason i cant get past the bolded part.

  can someone maybe explain that a little?

  if this even makes sense, im usually not t his dense, i've been reading this for ever and for some reason i keep getting thrown off track at that part.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  scholar

  AnnOMaly

  Post 1368

  There is nothing sensible about your interpretation either. Perhaps you should come clearly and state when did the seventy years begin and end. Our interpretation of Jer. 20:10 is based on the fact that the seventy years according to Jeremiah's earlier prophecy was about the desolation of Judah which fact cannot be harmonized with your nonsense. Scholar is LOL.

  scholar JW
• 
  100

  Where did 607 come from?

  by MrFreeze in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  okay so we've obviously established on this board that 607 is not the correct date that babylon destroyed jerusalem.

  even before 1914 came around, the bible students still thought 1914 would be a pivital date.

  the only way they can gain that info is from the 7 times or w/e.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  scholar

  MrFreeze

  Post 85

  I am not interested in your personal opinions of me. What I do is my own business. The fact of the matter is that I responded to youir question but typical of apostates who hate the Truth you respond only with a personal attack.For your information secular historians do not agree for a precise date for the Fall so we opt for the Bible which alone supports 607 BCE.

  scholar JW
• 
  100

  Where did 607 come from?

  by MrFreeze in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  okay so we've obviously established on this board that 607 is not the correct date that babylon destroyed jerusalem.

  even before 1914 came around, the bible students still thought 1914 would be a pivital date.

  the only way they can gain that info is from the 7 times or w/e.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  scholar

  MrFreeze

  I think I misunderstood your question. The date of 607 and its precursor 606 BCE for the Fall of Jerusalem is most definitely well established according to the Biblle and secular history. The corrected date of 607 BCE is validated by the determination of the seventy years of Jeremiah and the simple fact that it also commenced the Gentile Times which expired in 1914 CE. This means that ancient and modern history along with prophecy corroborates the determination of 607 BCE as fully explained by the 'celebrated' WT scholars/

  scholar JW
• 
  106

  Help with another 607 vs 587 question............

  by thraxer68 in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  ok, this is driving me nuts for whatever reason i cant get past the bolded part.

  can someone maybe explain that a little?

  if this even makes sense, im usually not t his dense, i've been reading this for ever and for some reason i keep getting thrown off track at that part.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  scholar

  AnnOMaly

  Post 1367

  Your hypothesis fails because Jeremiah's words at Jeremiah 29:10 simply admonish those exiles of the first deportation to simply settle down, have their babies until the foreordained prophetic period of seventy years would be fulfilled. At that time the seventy years had not then commenced because the land was not desolated until Jerusalem fell in 607 BCE in accordance with Jeremiah's prophecy at Jer. 25:9-11. Such prophecy and history definitely proves in spite of the protests of apostates, those naughty apostates, that the seventy years was a period of servitude, exile and desolation of Judah and all of its citizens.

  scholar JW
• 
  106

  Help with another 607 vs 587 question............

  by thraxer68 in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  ok, this is driving me nuts for whatever reason i cant get past the bolded part.

  can someone maybe explain that a little?

  if this even makes sense, im usually not t his dense, i've been reading this for ever and for some reason i keep getting thrown off track at that part.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  scholar

  thraxer68

  Jeremiah's words as recorded in ch.29 were addressed to the Jewish Exiles in Babylon who were part of that first deportation to Babylon hence suich words of comfort must have been written prior to the Fall and the commencement of the seventy years of Exile-Servitude-Exile. Jeremiah simply informed those earlier exiles that they had to remian in or at Bablon until that ordained period of seventy years had expired.

  The translation of Jeremiah 29;10 with that controversial phrase ' at Babylon' is consistent with the context of the chapter and Hebrew grammar. Some scholars prefer 'for Babylon' and this too is permissible for it along with 'at Babylon' proves that the seventy years was a period of Exile-Desolation-Servitude.

  scholar JW