Prologos: Only criminals have to fear surveillance
I have heard this kind of argument so much, the "if you've got nothing to hide, you've got nothing to fear" approach to the idea of surveillance. That's like saying "I don't care about free speech because I've got nothing to say". Sometimes we don't appreciate the value of something (like privacy) until it's gone...or until a less benevolent government is ruling over us that sees a lot of good use to make of all that surveillance data that was benign under the previous government...who's to say that just because something you're doing quite innocently now, won't be considered criminal in future?
Surveillance has it's place and is useful when used in a proportionate way, but please, no more of this "only criminals have to fear surveillance" reasoning. Unfortunately it's this view that is making us sleepwalk into a 1984 style surveillance society.
Ps -sorry for the slight diversion from the topic at hand. As you were (and good point, Username)