Depends. If it's a close family member - 10%. If it's some body you never liked anyway - 100%
Seriously, I think for anyone outside of a family relationship with the DF'ed person it's going to be up around 80%
konceptual99
JoinedPosts by konceptual99
-
22
just a question
by poopie inwhat percentage would you say of all jehovah's witnesses really 100 percent follow the shunning decree to the letter just answer with a percent thank you
-
-
-
12
Aussie exJW Comedienne on BBC (Limited Time)
by berrygerry inhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b05r3srd.
deborah frances-white - online.. .
spot on - and funny..
-
-
konceptual99
Will that work? Can't the Beeb get it taken down? -
12
Aussie exJW Comedienne on BBC (Limited Time)
by berrygerry inhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b05r3srd.
deborah frances-white - online.. .
spot on - and funny..
-
-
konceptual99
This is worth 100 incidents of making a scene in a KH and 1000 protests outside a convention.
It would be great if it was linked to from some other sites like jwleaks, jwsurvey etc.
It's time limited but I wonder if it's possible to get it extended?
-
16
Videolink speech by a HQ member this Saturday
by Powermetal4ever inso this saturday we are going to have some kind of videolink speech, by a james mantz from headquarters apparantly.
how very exciting... or not.
thats what my mum said anyway, and i just thought like " yeah right" i can t remember we have ever had it before, is it a new take?
-
-
konceptual99
Yup, three hour streamed show next Saturday pm. What fun.
-
16
Videolink speech by a HQ member this Saturday
by Powermetal4ever inso this saturday we are going to have some kind of videolink speech, by a james mantz from headquarters apparantly.
how very exciting... or not.
thats what my mum said anyway, and i just thought like " yeah right" i can t remember we have ever had it before, is it a new take?
-
-
konceptual99
The UK has a zone visit next Saturday. -
30
Tear down the whole of South Africa
by Louise inthere was a statue outside the rhodes university.
a 30 year old black student then threw his pooh on the statue and that got the ball rolling to pull the statue down.
the board of this university built also gives out burseries and grants to previously disadvantaged black south africans and not disadvantaged black south africans.. there has been a huge debate in the country and now the statue has been removed.
-
-
konceptual99
Interesting BBC op-ed
-
30
Tear down the whole of South Africa
by Louise inthere was a statue outside the rhodes university.
a 30 year old black student then threw his pooh on the statue and that got the ball rolling to pull the statue down.
the board of this university built also gives out burseries and grants to previously disadvantaged black south africans and not disadvantaged black south africans.. there has been a huge debate in the country and now the statue has been removed.
-
-
konceptual99
The second link to banananewsline is satire. Just to be clear... -
47
Article: Reveal News-California court guts child abuse ruling against Jehovah's Witnesses
by AndersonsInfo inhttp://www.revealnews.org/article/california-court-guts-child-abuse-ruling-against-jehovahs-witnesses/.
california court guts child abuse ruling against jehovahs witnesses.
topics: religion / religion and government .
-
-
konceptual99
The point about duty to warn the congregation is covered in the court documents:
https://jwleaks.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/04-13-2015-appeals-court-final-decision-a136641.pdf
Check page 12 onwards - there is several pages of legal reasoning.
The punitive damages were based on the duty to warn the congregation. Since the ruling was there was no LEGAL duty to warn the congregation then the punitive damages were removed.
When you real the documentation you can see why this was not upheld and what the broader implications are should this duty have been established as a legal responsibility.
Of course, this does affect the MORAL responsibility to protect the congregation as far as is possible. It does not mean that some policy cannot be formulated that helps protect the congregation as much as possible from the risk of child molestation without exposing the congregation to the broader implications of a duty to protect from the risk of one congregation member committing a crime of any sort against another.
It is bizarre that the WTS is so ready to spout on about when things, such as building projects, have been done to a standard way beyond that required by the law yet on this matter seem only too happy to go only as far as the law requires them to go and not implement the best practice that so many other organisations have adopted.
-
105
LATEST NEWS: CANDANCE CONTI VERIDICT READY - WT LOST!!!!!!!
by Viva la Vida ini'm not an expert but that is my understanding of this: .
opinion filed.. (signed published) the judgment against defendants on the negligence count is affirmed.
the judgment against watchtower on the cause of action for punitive damages is reversed with directions to enter judgment for watchtower on punitive damages.
-
-
konceptual99
Err... dislike on my post?
I don't object to anyone's opinion but I posted straight out of WT publications. I'll happily discuss the disconnect between what the WTS says to it's publishers (the clue is in the name) and elders compared to how it presented the ministry to the courts.
-
23
'great crowd' are in the temple (naos) but not in the new covenant???
by fukitol inin one of the biggest about-faces in watchtower history, in a 2002 question from readers it was admitted that the great crowd is indeed in the temple itself (naos) in revelation 7. .
but notice the statement bolded below from that article comparing the great crowd to the proselytes in ancient israel.
the statement is made that the proselytes "submitted to the law covenant.
-
-
konceptual99
Gotta agree with fukitol on the swallowing the spin.
Most of the R&F have NO problem accepting the WTS view of the new covenant. It's not even that illogical as at least they can spin scriptures rather than pure rhetoric as with the overlapping generations.
As for increasing numbers of partakers... no one seems that bothered. Many have forgotten or were never exposed to the buzz around looking at the decreasing numbers 20+ years ago and simply say we can't say who is and who isn't.
I have tried over and over again to get through to my wife on these points and as open and liberal as she seems to be, all of this simply is water off a ducks back.