all exhibits for case study 54, jehovah's witnesses and watchtower, have been released by the arc.. http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/exhibits/10908a67-70c5-4103-94cc-dac096fdb585/case-study-54,-march-2017,-sydney.
exhibit list.
joint statement of o'brien and spinks.
And btw the reason for the same posts is that the site delayed the posts and it kept on repeating the same post....RO
That's not how things work..
Try..
You were impatient with how long it was taking to show your post..
So you kept hitting the "Post Reply" button..
Next time..
Just wait until your post shows up, as posted..
all exhibits for case study 54, jehovah's witnesses and watchtower, have been released by the arc.. http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/exhibits/10908a67-70c5-4103-94cc-dac096fdb585/case-study-54,-march-2017,-sydney.
exhibit list.
joint statement of o'brien and spinks.
I am the dumb one for actually saying something so your just a dumb mute because you won't even talk.....Richard Oliver
all exhibits for case study 54, jehovah's witnesses and watchtower, have been released by the arc.. http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/exhibits/10908a67-70c5-4103-94cc-dac096fdb585/case-study-54,-march-2017,-sydney.
exhibit list.
joint statement of o'brien and spinks.
So yes Jesus did shun someone who was going to participate in a plot to kill him.....RO
by way of a general question: can a system of belief outlive the disintegration of its core ideas?
how and why??.
urge you to reflect, and post freely.. your thoughts are appreciated without bias..
all exhibits for case study 54, jehovah's witnesses and watchtower, have been released by the arc.. http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/exhibits/10908a67-70c5-4103-94cc-dac096fdb585/case-study-54,-march-2017,-sydney.
exhibit list.
joint statement of o'brien and spinks.
Outlaw, if you want me to respond to you, you should address what I say in my post.....Fisherman
I did..
All you can do is yell and call names at people. --RO position stands.....Fisherman
You`re not aware, no one actually physically speaks on this forum?.....OUTLAW
Fisherman, if you want me to respond to you, you should address what I say in my post..
.....
Unless That's Beyond Your Capabilities..
all exhibits for case study 54, jehovah's witnesses and watchtower, have been released by the arc.. http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/exhibits/10908a67-70c5-4103-94cc-dac096fdb585/case-study-54,-march-2017,-sydney.
exhibit list.
joint statement of o'brien and spinks.
All you can do is yell and call names at people. --RO position stands.....Fisherman
You`re not aware, no one actually physically speaks on this forum?..
.....
an old jw friend of my wife stopped by here in fla. i knew there would be some subliminal bs.
i had to keep quiet through all the this old system can not go on much longer and are you going to the memorial?
gag.
I had to keep quiet through all the this old system can not go on much longer.
Graveyards are filled with Generations of JW`s..
Who parroted that same WBT$ Crap..
all exhibits for case study 54, jehovah's witnesses and watchtower, have been released by the arc.. http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/exhibits/10908a67-70c5-4103-94cc-dac096fdb585/case-study-54,-march-2017,-sydney.
exhibit list.
joint statement of o'brien and spinks.
OUTLAW -- I'm sorry, but I also have to take issue with the fact that you cited Wikipedia's "Straw Man" argument page.
You should have cited Wikipedia's entry for "Fucktard.".....BOC
LOL!!@BOC!!..
Unfortunately Richard won`t accept Wikipedia`s definition..
He`ll find some way to make the word exceptionally desirable and really cool..
So we`ll go with a Respected Dictionary definition..
You know it`s bad..Oxford Living Dictionary:
Fucktard
Noun
A contemptible or stupid person.
When The Dali Lama.
IS LAUGHING AT YOU..
all exhibits for case study 54, jehovah's witnesses and watchtower, have been released by the arc.. http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/exhibits/10908a67-70c5-4103-94cc-dac096fdb585/case-study-54,-march-2017,-sydney.
exhibit list.
joint statement of o'brien and spinks.
That is the problem, with allowing anyone to edit a encyclopedia, you don't get the best results.....Richard Oliver
That's your rebutal?
Wikipedia is misrepresenting the definition of a Strawman Arguement?
www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/what-is-a-straw-man-argumentFeb 4, 2016 - Debaters invoke a straw man when they put forth an argument—usually something extreme or easy to argue against—that they know their opponent doesn't support. You put forth a straw man because you know it will be easy for you to knock down or discredit. It's a way of misrepresenting your opponent's position.
www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/straw-man.html
The Straw Man fallacy is committed when a person simply ignores a person's actual position and substitutes a distorted, exaggerated or misrepresented version of that position.
Your inability to understand the definition of words and poor reading comprehension..
Is beyond the pale..
all exhibits for case study 54, jehovah's witnesses and watchtower, have been released by the arc.. http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/exhibits/10908a67-70c5-4103-94cc-dac096fdb585/case-study-54,-march-2017,-sydney.
exhibit list.
joint statement of o'brien and spinks.
What I may have done in the past is a red herring where to avoid specific topics by shifting it to a different argument......Richard Oliver
You`re using a Strawman Argument, to refute a Strawman Argument..
From Wikipedia
A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while refuting an argument that was not advanced by that opponent.[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man".
The typical straw man argument creates the illusion of having completely refuted or defeated an opponent's proposition through the covert replacement of it with a different proposition (i.e. "stand up a straw man") and the subsequent refutation of that false argument ("knock down a straw man") instead of the opponent's proposition.[2][3]
.
