Cofty: Then there is no possible excuse and the person is morally responsible for a child's death.
I agree. That's the only conclusion I can arrive at.
no subtlety here, it's going to be obvious where i'm going with this.
please consider the following scenario.. you're seated on a railway platform bench waiting for your train.
a high speed intercity is about to hurtle through without stopping when you see a small child running to the platforms edge!
Cofty: Then there is no possible excuse and the person is morally responsible for a child's death.
I agree. That's the only conclusion I can arrive at.
no subtlety here, it's going to be obvious where i'm going with this.
please consider the following scenario.. you're seated on a railway platform bench waiting for your train.
a high speed intercity is about to hurtle through without stopping when you see a small child running to the platforms edge!
You assume correctly.
no subtlety here, it's going to be obvious where i'm going with this.
please consider the following scenario.. you're seated on a railway platform bench waiting for your train.
a high speed intercity is about to hurtle through without stopping when you see a small child running to the platforms edge!
Stan, I'm not ignoring parental responsibility, guilt can lay with several individuals all at once, it's the inaction of the observer I'm asking about.
Whether anyone else has failed to care or not would you be guilty if you'd failed to act?
Slim', you have of course seen where I'm going with this so c'mon, give me a good reason for God's failure to act?
no subtlety here, it's going to be obvious where i'm going with this.
please consider the following scenario.. you're seated on a railway platform bench waiting for your train.
a high speed intercity is about to hurtle through without stopping when you see a small child running to the platforms edge!
There's no reason for inaction Cofty. Acting to prevent the child's death would incur no penalty or injury to you.
And I understand what you say about legal liability but put that to one side, it's just the moral responsibility I'm interested in.
no subtlety here, it's going to be obvious where i'm going with this.
please consider the following scenario.. you're seated on a railway platform bench waiting for your train.
a high speed intercity is about to hurtle through without stopping when you see a small child running to the platforms edge!
No subtlety here, it's going to be obvious where I'm going with this. Please consider the following scenario.
You're seated on a railway platform bench waiting for your train. A high speed intercity is about to hurtle through without stopping when you see a small child running to the platforms edge! Thankfully, disaster can be averted. You don't even have to get up off the bench, just put out your arm and scoop up the child.
But you don't. You watch as the little boy falls onto the tracks and is pulverised by 185 tonnes of metal.
My question. What responsibility do you bear for the child's death?
hebrews 6:4-8. for it is impossible, in the case of those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, and have shared in the holy spirit, 5 and have tasted the goodness of the word of god and the powers of the age to come, 6 and then have fallen away, to restore them again to repentance, since they are crucifying once again the son of god to their own harm and holding him up to contempt.
7 for land that has drunk the rain that often falls on it, and produces a crop useful to those for whose sake it is cultivated, receives a blessing from god.
8 but if it bears thorns and thistles, it is worthless and near to being cursed, and its end is to be burned.. but then i read articles that say that you cannot lose your salvation and that this scripture isn't talking about that.. but then 2 timothy says.
However, nothing external to ourselves can separate us from the love of God in Christ. Romans 8:39
Vanderhoven you have never been willing to debate your faith and the claims you make with me. I'll ask again if you would change your mind.
i believe this list which many of us worked on needs to see the light of day again...and added to if possible.. you know you are in the wrong religion:1. when the all important question is not: "do you believe in the lord jesus christ?"....but....
"do you believe in the "faithful and discreet slave" appointed in brooklyn in 1919?"2.
when you will be refused baptism if: a. you don't believe jerusalem was destroyed in 607 bc (whereas all non-jw scholars, all encyclopedias and all history books say this event took place in 587 bc.)b.
We visited my parents yesterday. Dad's never been involved but Mum is JW to her core. Baptised around '71 or '72 and never wavered.
Her friends in the only congregation she's ever been a part of are now very elderly, some are in care homes or no longer with us. The congregation has been her support network, social club and extended family for half a century.
I'm as apostate/atheist as it gets but I wouldn't dream of taking this away from her now, how cruel would that be?
Even I would now say that this is the right religion for her.
I'd challenge any Christian here who argues that JW's don't have the truth to take up the debate with me about your own beliefs. It's easy to poke fun at the faith of folks like my Mum when you know they'll never be here to defend themselves.
Pick on me instead - if you dare.
would you have guessed it's vaping?.
apparently kids can buy vapes in the uk - with very little/zero deterrents for retailers.
follow the money!.
You have to be 18 to buy vape products legally in the UK, the same age at which you're allowed to buy shotguns, rifles and ammunition under the Gun Control Act in the USA.
i believe this list which many of us worked on needs to see the light of day again...and added to if possible.. you know you are in the wrong religion:1. when the all important question is not: "do you believe in the lord jesus christ?"....but....
"do you believe in the "faithful and discreet slave" appointed in brooklyn in 1919?"2.
when you will be refused baptism if: a. you don't believe jerusalem was destroyed in 607 bc (whereas all non-jw scholars, all encyclopedias and all history books say this event took place in 587 bc.)b.
If the children were going to grow up and enslave you. Or if you were enslaved by their parents and you prayed to God. Would you want relief or not?
Disgraceful, you should be ashamed of yourself.
i believe this list which many of us worked on needs to see the light of day again...and added to if possible.. you know you are in the wrong religion:1. when the all important question is not: "do you believe in the lord jesus christ?"....but....
"do you believe in the "faithful and discreet slave" appointed in brooklyn in 1919?"2.
when you will be refused baptism if: a. you don't believe jerusalem was destroyed in 607 bc (whereas all non-jw scholars, all encyclopedias and all history books say this event took place in 587 bc.)b.
Are you trying to justify the killing of children Fisherman? If that's Christian morality you can keep it.