1.- ?.
2.- ?.
i think those are fair questions..... .
I am looking for information that the http://www.magistratescourtvic.ozehosting.com.au site is blacklisted or fake.
When I click on a link provided by Cyberjesus (http://www.robtex.com/ip/210.247.176.113.html#ip) I see information that it is not blacklisted. Go to the page linked below and see my post 494 for more information, including a screen shot. Any explanations are welcome.
i'm gonna play the skeptic today on a topic that is painful for a lot of people on this forum.
my intent is not to stir anything up but to make sure facts are confirmed.
bear in mind, i'm sickened by the wt's role (and the heirarchy down to elders) in child molestation cover-ups.
What am I missing?
Cyberjesus said,
HA that domain is blacklisted
check this out
http://www.robtex.com/ip/210.247.176.113.html#ip
When I click on the provided link I get this...
I see notations that the ozehosting sites are not blacklisted (circled in red). Granted, looking at a web pages like this makes dizzy, so maybe something is there that I'm not seeing. Please point it out.
1.- ?.
2.- ?.
i think those are fair questions..... .
http://www.magistratescourtvic.ozehosting.com.au is a fake site,
Try the link now and do a simple search for upcoming cases. Check the Criminal list circle, then enter 2-28-2012 as the date. Note the results. Then check them against the results you get from whatever legitimate search site you are using, or search as Sizemik suggested above. See if the results don't match for that date.
When I did it I got lots of cases scheduled for 2-28-2012. If there is something wrong with the ozehosting link, I would like an explanation of why. Not looking for a heated argument here, just want to know what is wrong with it.
i'm gonna play the skeptic today on a topic that is painful for a lot of people on this forum.
my intent is not to stir anything up but to make sure facts are confirmed.
bear in mind, i'm sickened by the wt's role (and the heirarchy down to elders) in child molestation cover-ups.
@ Smiddy,
Scenic Veiwer I liked your post
And Sizemik,
The screen shot Scenic Viewer posted is genuine from memory, as I have accessed the govt site many times over many months and seen the same information.
Thanks for your words of support. I still hope to understand why the link I posted has something wrong with it, but it yielded reliable results in the past, and seems to be doing the same today. Maybe tomorrow will tell.
i'm gonna play the skeptic today on a topic that is painful for a lot of people on this forum.
my intent is not to stir anything up but to make sure facts are confirmed.
bear in mind, i'm sickened by the wt's role (and the heirarchy down to elders) in child molestation cover-ups.
BTW, the Rabbi got my tip when I was 8 days old!
Ouch!
i'm gonna play the skeptic today on a topic that is painful for a lot of people on this forum.
my intent is not to stir anything up but to make sure facts are confirmed.
bear in mind, i'm sickened by the wt's role (and the heirarchy down to elders) in child molestation cover-ups.
@SixofNine,
Yes, you get a rim shot. Very funny.
i'm gonna play the skeptic today on a topic that is painful for a lot of people on this forum.
my intent is not to stir anything up but to make sure facts are confirmed.
bear in mind, i'm sickened by the wt's role (and the heirarchy down to elders) in child molestation cover-ups.
Iamallcool said,
"The more I am reading about this, Steven Unthank is not a fraud."
Neither are (were) his cases against Watchtower,
1) B12082206 - Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society
2) B12083833 - Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society
3) B12083527 - Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses
4) B12083367 - Faithful and Discreet Slave
5) B12083108 - Christian Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses
i'm gonna play the skeptic today on a topic that is painful for a lot of people on this forum.
my intent is not to stir anything up but to make sure facts are confirmed.
bear in mind, i'm sickened by the wt's role (and the heirarchy down to elders) in child molestation cover-ups.
Ok, it seems the link I originally posted is working now.
http://www.magistratescourtvic.ozehosting.com.au/cgi-bin/searchlist.pl
The only search criteria I put in was to check the Criminal List circle, and select a date, 2-28-2012. Below is a single screen shot of cases coming up on that date; it was a very long list and this screen shot is only the top few.
So my question now is, if it's a fake or blacklisted site (maybe you can see in the address like of the pic it's an ozehosting site, which has www.magistratescourtvic in front of it), why does it produce results?
I get...
- Case numbers (these are links that take you to more information about each case.)
- Name of Informant/Respondent
- Name of Defendent/Applicant
- Name of the Court
- Date
Just curious. I don't understand these things very well. Try it and see what results you get, then give me your feedback.
i'm gonna play the skeptic today on a topic that is painful for a lot of people on this forum.
my intent is not to stir anything up but to make sure facts are confirmed.
bear in mind, i'm sickened by the wt's role (and the heirarchy down to elders) in child molestation cover-ups.
I posted the screen shots of the search results I got a few weeks ago when I did a search regarding Steven Unthank's cases against Watchtower. Now I'm reading your responses that the link I posted is a 'phishing' site and a 'blacklisted' site.
I'm not sure what these terms mean...I'm not tech savvy...but I got the link from a post on this site months ago when the court cases started.
Indeed, I have just now tried to search using the link I provided and it doesn't work; I'm not sure if it's temporarily down, or something more. I've used it several times over that last few months, and can't explain why it isn't working now.
I used the link to the magistrates court provided by Cyberjesus, his post 3042, and was taken to the home page of the Magistrates Court, Victoria. From there I can't figure out how to do a search for specific cases.
However, since we have the case numbers of Unthanks's proceedings against Watchtower, perhaps someone gifted at searching could find a way to search by the case numbers. Here they are.
1) B12082206
2) B12083833
3) B12083527
4) B12083367
5) B12083108
I tried a general search on one of the links provided by Cyberjesus, but since 2-21-2012 has passed that date was grayed out, and not a search option. I tried searching for all cases, not just Unthank's.
Even though the date of the last court appearance has passed, and the cases have been dropped, therefore no future court dates, the case numbers should reveal the outcome, ie they have been dismissed.
I'd hate to think that I've been taken in by a clever fraud, but I guess it's possible. However I have the utmost faith in Barbara Anderson and others that have posted in support if Steven Unthank, so I don't believe that's what has happened here.
i'm gonna play the skeptic today on a topic that is painful for a lot of people on this forum.
my intent is not to stir anything up but to make sure facts are confirmed.
bear in mind, i'm sickened by the wt's role (and the heirarchy down to elders) in child molestation cover-ups.
SweetBabyCheezits asked a good question,
"I just skimmed a couple this morning and I'm just curious if there are any goverment websites that provide details or a summary of the case or charges made?"
Yes there is such a website, and Steven Unthank is legitimate as the prosecutor of Watchtower, and as a genuinely concerned citizen for the safety and rights of children.
-- To confirm Unthank's legitimacy as prosecutor of Watchtower, go to this website,
http://www.magistratescourtvic.ozehosting.com.au/cgi-bin/searchlist.pl
-- Click on the Criminal Lists circle.
-- Fill in some of the information asked for to narrow down the search results.
A few weeks ago I did this and here is a screen shot of what it looked like...
The results of the search revealed all 5 cases that Unthank had against Watchtower. Here is the screen shot...
Since the cases have been dropped by the DPP I don't know what a search will show now, but up until 2-21-2012 Steven Unthank was clearly shown as the prosecutor of Watchtower.
As to the image of the crying girl, I believe the wording that it was an image of a molestation victim in the Traralgon Congregation is unfortunate. However, as he and Barbara Anderson explained the word "image" can be used in the sense of being a "representative image" to illustrate a point. It is very common in the publishing world.
It would be better in my opinion if the picture had not been posted, or at least the wording hadn't suggested that it was a photo of an actual molestation victim, because it caused a lot of confusion where it isn't needed. The word "photo" wasn't used, but that is the way many readers took it, and indeed the word "image" can also refer to an actual photograph. However this is a small technical point that should not overshadow the legitimacy of the criminal cases involved here.
Steven Unthank has done a tremendous amount of voluntary work to support the rights and safety of children in Victoria; he should be appreciated and applauded for it. Barbara Anderson is to be admired as well for her tireless work in support of child molestion victims in the Watchtower organization. For Barbara to support Steven in his work is a good thing. I don't believe that either one of them should be criticized for the work done, and the positive outcomes that have been achieved, in these child protection cases.
I am extremely thankful that people like Steven Unthank and Barbara Anderson exist and are willing to work tirelessly for the benefit of other human beings. They both have my whole-hearted support.
