obama speaks at us war cemetery on d-day landings anniversary.
"united states of america is and will remain the greatest force for freedom the world has ever known.".
on may 28, obama delivered a commencement address to the us armys newest officers at west point, where he argued america would remain an empire forever.. .
Snare and a Racket:
No one said hubris is rare. But it is a bad sign and is a foreboding of dissaster.
These are the factors that make up hubris:
Narcissism - Series of Successes - Uncritical acceptance of Accolades - Exemption from Rules
This turns into Arrogance - Reliance on simplistic formulas for success - Failure to face changing realities.
Napolean had 35 wins and 3 losses before he attacked Russia.
obama speaks at us war cemetery on d-day landings anniversary.
"united states of america is and will remain the greatest force for freedom the world has ever known.".
on may 28, obama delivered a commencement address to the us armys newest officers at west point, where he argued america would remain an empire forever.. .
NewYork - Don't fool yourself. The US lifestyle is fertilized with blood. The US has made deals with the elites of many nations. These elites are most often minorities that are only too willing to do the US bidding for their chance at the trough. These elites allow American companies to exploit their human and natural resources. American companies usually get 85% of the profits from oil, aluminum etc. etc. The remaining 15% goes to the elites who refuse to better the life of their fellow citizens. This story has been told over and over - Iran, Egypt, Mexico, South America, Phillipines, Panama. There is a reason so many people hate the USA.
Watch this video and ask yourself why this isn't shown on western media. This is what the USA backed regime in Kiev are currently doing to the people in eastern Ukraine that want to separate from Kiev.
obama speaks at us war cemetery on d-day landings anniversary.
"united states of america is and will remain the greatest force for freedom the world has ever known.".
on may 28, obama delivered a commencement address to the us armys newest officers at west point, where he argued america would remain an empire forever.. .
Obama speaks at US war cemetery on D-day landings anniversary
"United States of America is and will remain the greatest force for freedom the world has ever known."
On May 28, Obama delivered a commencement address to the US Army’s newest officers at West Point, where he argued America would remain an empire forever.
"So the United States is and remains the one indispensable nation. That has been true for the century past, and it will be true for the century to come."
"In her heart she keeps saying "I sit a queen, and I am no widow, and I shall never see mourning." That is why in one day her plagues will come, death and mourning and famine and she will be completely burned with fire." Reve 18:7,8
The idea that Babylon the great is the world empire of false religion is way off the mark. Babylon the Great is the USA riding the worlds governments forcing them to comply to her currency, institutions, military alliances. The Russian beast is recovering from its death stroke and is about to create its Eurasian Union in spite of the USA trying to shove NATO into Ukraine.
Will the Watchtower ever "AWAKE"?
the classic debate between those who believe that consciousness is merely the result of the operation of the brain, and those who believe that it is apart from the brain, like the idea of a soul or the classic dualistic distinction between mind and body, is a well-known one.. however the thought has occurred that when people try to convince me that the soul cannot be real; soul in the sense of consciousness being a separate thing to the operation of the brain, then really the materialistic non spiritual view is in fact a rehash of animism, strange as that might sound.. animism is the idea that soul, spirit, consciousness, or whatever it might be called, exists in plants, animals, things, objects, places or basically in everything and anything in the material world.
the view of some is that very primitive cultures had this wide category of spiritual belief, which eventually evolved into the all the religions, faiths and spiritualties of today.
some of the faiths of modern times are not defined as animistic because these draw a distinction between soul and body or in modern parlance, consciousness and brain.. so in very ancient times, at the dawn of human spiritual belief, the sun, for example, rising and setting was seen not so much as being caused by the proverbial spaghetti monster but as being the proverbial spaghetti monster.
Ag:
This is no different than a rock which responds to outside forces and stores information about them (after all, scientists are able to date rocks based upon things like the effect of the planet's magnetic inversions and the heat they've been subjected to).
Rocks react - For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
Organisms - Respond
History of rocks are written by humans.
You are making a very big mistake. Just because two things might be the same in some ways they are not necessarily the same in all ways.
Normally this analogical problem needs to be pointed out because two things are often similar in MANY ways. In your case the only similarity between a rock and an organism is they are both material. That is not sufficient basis for asserting that SINCE rocks and organisms are both material THEREFORE rocks possess mental characteristics. If rocks were placed on the "mind" continuum they would represent zero which is complete opposite. Anything that is zero doesn't belong on the continuum.
I believe you have confused rocks with brains. You do have a brain in your skull right? Or is it just one big chunk of bone?
This isn't meant as an insult. I wouldn't be having this discussion with a inorganic chucnk of rock. This is reducing your line of reason to the absurd.
Thinking is not magical. It is a material process and depends on material. However it is of a different order because it processes information.
Tie a knot in a rope. By tying the knot you have informed the rope. Is the knot the same as the rope? Now slowly slide the knot along the rope. Notice that the knot maintains its structure even though different sections of rope are used. Eventually, the knot reaches the end of the rope and it disappears. That's the death of the knot. The rope remains. Does the rope weigh less with the knot gone? The knot was information. The brain manages huge amounts of information - beyond a simple knot. Information is not material.
the gang in brooklyn must be very busy.
the wt ranks # 29 of all pages on wiki for editing.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/the-100-most-edited-wikipedia-articles/.
I was just wondering about that.
the classic debate between those who believe that consciousness is merely the result of the operation of the brain, and those who believe that it is apart from the brain, like the idea of a soul or the classic dualistic distinction between mind and body, is a well-known one.. however the thought has occurred that when people try to convince me that the soul cannot be real; soul in the sense of consciousness being a separate thing to the operation of the brain, then really the materialistic non spiritual view is in fact a rehash of animism, strange as that might sound.. animism is the idea that soul, spirit, consciousness, or whatever it might be called, exists in plants, animals, things, objects, places or basically in everything and anything in the material world.
the view of some is that very primitive cultures had this wide category of spiritual belief, which eventually evolved into the all the religions, faiths and spiritualties of today.
some of the faiths of modern times are not defined as animistic because these draw a distinction between soul and body or in modern parlance, consciousness and brain.. so in very ancient times, at the dawn of human spiritual belief, the sun, for example, rising and setting was seen not so much as being caused by the proverbial spaghetti monster but as being the proverbial spaghetti monster.
Apog:
Plants move. = Tropism
The startle reflex is mediated by the nervous system. Rocks don't have nervous systems. You don't startle rocks. The whole purpose behind the startle reflex is to avoid coming in contact with something dangerous.
The many arrangements we each have with our personal parasites doesn't alter the identity of the organism as a whole. You can kill the yeast infection and the organism continues. If you extract the gold from the quartz you don't have the same rock anymore.
The problem with your summary of nervous system activity is that rocks simply don't have nervous systems. It doesn't explain anything.
That's the whole point. It's not a difference in degree but a difference in kind.
You might say that rocks have a relationship with everything in the universe, but those relationships don't "mean" anything to the rock. Rock A might be 3 cm from rock B. Who cares? Yes - WHO cares and a WHO is an organism in contrast to a rock that is merely a WHAT.
Meaning, also called value, requires a living organism.
the classic debate between those who believe that consciousness is merely the result of the operation of the brain, and those who believe that it is apart from the brain, like the idea of a soul or the classic dualistic distinction between mind and body, is a well-known one.. however the thought has occurred that when people try to convince me that the soul cannot be real; soul in the sense of consciousness being a separate thing to the operation of the brain, then really the materialistic non spiritual view is in fact a rehash of animism, strange as that might sound.. animism is the idea that soul, spirit, consciousness, or whatever it might be called, exists in plants, animals, things, objects, places or basically in everything and anything in the material world.
the view of some is that very primitive cultures had this wide category of spiritual belief, which eventually evolved into the all the religions, faiths and spiritualties of today.
some of the faiths of modern times are not defined as animistic because these draw a distinction between soul and body or in modern parlance, consciousness and brain.. so in very ancient times, at the dawn of human spiritual belief, the sun, for example, rising and setting was seen not so much as being caused by the proverbial spaghetti monster but as being the proverbial spaghetti monster.
Are some of you really ignorant of the differences between living things and non-living things?
Non-living things continue moving in the same direction unless some exterior force acts on it.
Living organisms are sensitive to their nutritional needs and their need to avoid danger.
Living things change directions based on their needs.
Non-living things don't have needs.
If you break a rock in two that rock ceases to exist and you have two rocks with similar composition but separate trajectories.
Living things can be cut in pieces and it still has its cellular identity.
Living things can choose the direction in which it moves. Rocks can't choose direction. If a rock is impacted by another rock it will either move in the opposite direction of the impact force or it will break apart and no longer exist.
Living organsims maintain their identity over time even though the materials that it is made of come and go.
You also can't speak about a brain in a bottle. That is pure fiction - not even science fiction. Brains need to be viewed as having a body connected to it. That body has needs and the brain, along with muscle, sense organs, and guts each serve their part in a functioning organism.
Organisms differ from rocks in kind not degree.
the classic debate between those who believe that consciousness is merely the result of the operation of the brain, and those who believe that it is apart from the brain, like the idea of a soul or the classic dualistic distinction between mind and body, is a well-known one.. however the thought has occurred that when people try to convince me that the soul cannot be real; soul in the sense of consciousness being a separate thing to the operation of the brain, then really the materialistic non spiritual view is in fact a rehash of animism, strange as that might sound.. animism is the idea that soul, spirit, consciousness, or whatever it might be called, exists in plants, animals, things, objects, places or basically in everything and anything in the material world.
the view of some is that very primitive cultures had this wide category of spiritual belief, which eventually evolved into the all the religions, faiths and spiritualties of today.
some of the faiths of modern times are not defined as animistic because these draw a distinction between soul and body or in modern parlance, consciousness and brain.. so in very ancient times, at the dawn of human spiritual belief, the sun, for example, rising and setting was seen not so much as being caused by the proverbial spaghetti monster but as being the proverbial spaghetti monster.
We tend to be brain worshipers. The brain is another organ of the body. The brain is embedded in an organism.
Consciousness requires content. You are not just conscious - you are conscious of some THING.
There are also other tissues that act like a nervous system complete with an array of neurotransmitters. The enteric or "gut" brain.
These facts are the reason it is highly unlikely that scientists will be able to duplicate some aspects of human thinking.
The only minds we know of are embedded in flesh.
Some good books about the mind.
Mind and Nature an Necessary Unity - Gregory Bateson
The Mechanism of Mind Edward Debono
The Tree of Life Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela
I want to add something else. The brain is NOT creative. The brain is a reactor. It is the interplay between the brain and its environment that is creative. The brains main purpose is to manage the negative. The brain keeps us in a rut. It wants to quickly form a habit circuit. The quicker we habituate the safer we tend to be. Creativity is an emergent phenomenon - a by product of pattern formation. A good pattern reaches our consciousness because it incorporates a large amount of environmental inputs (iinformation) in a sudden gestalt formation. We experience that as an Aha! moment. Comedians are especially skilled (gifted) at exploiting this.
the classic debate between those who believe that consciousness is merely the result of the operation of the brain, and those who believe that it is apart from the brain, like the idea of a soul or the classic dualistic distinction between mind and body, is a well-known one.. however the thought has occurred that when people try to convince me that the soul cannot be real; soul in the sense of consciousness being a separate thing to the operation of the brain, then really the materialistic non spiritual view is in fact a rehash of animism, strange as that might sound.. animism is the idea that soul, spirit, consciousness, or whatever it might be called, exists in plants, animals, things, objects, places or basically in everything and anything in the material world.
the view of some is that very primitive cultures had this wide category of spiritual belief, which eventually evolved into the all the religions, faiths and spiritualties of today.
some of the faiths of modern times are not defined as animistic because these draw a distinction between soul and body or in modern parlance, consciousness and brain.. so in very ancient times, at the dawn of human spiritual belief, the sun, for example, rising and setting was seen not so much as being caused by the proverbial spaghetti monster but as being the proverbial spaghetti monster.
Seraphim,
The quickest way to affect consciousness is to physically destroy various parts of the brain.
A hole in the brain is a hole in the soul.
the classic debate between those who believe that consciousness is merely the result of the operation of the brain, and those who believe that it is apart from the brain, like the idea of a soul or the classic dualistic distinction between mind and body, is a well-known one.. however the thought has occurred that when people try to convince me that the soul cannot be real; soul in the sense of consciousness being a separate thing to the operation of the brain, then really the materialistic non spiritual view is in fact a rehash of animism, strange as that might sound.. animism is the idea that soul, spirit, consciousness, or whatever it might be called, exists in plants, animals, things, objects, places or basically in everything and anything in the material world.
the view of some is that very primitive cultures had this wide category of spiritual belief, which eventually evolved into the all the religions, faiths and spiritualties of today.
some of the faiths of modern times are not defined as animistic because these draw a distinction between soul and body or in modern parlance, consciousness and brain.. so in very ancient times, at the dawn of human spiritual belief, the sun, for example, rising and setting was seen not so much as being caused by the proverbial spaghetti monster but as being the proverbial spaghetti monster.
Consciousness can be altered with scalpels, hammers, halucinogens, etc.
