Happy to say that this sort of thing has not been a criminal act in Australia for a long time, No street action that I know off in the suburb where live. In fact, the only time i've noticed street action in Sydney was in a gay area that I walked through on my way home (when I was working).
fulltimestudent
JoinedPosts by fulltimestudent
-
81
Are You Horrifed if Someone Goes Into a “Massage Parlor”?
by minimus inyesterday, robert kraft, the owner of the new england patriots, got busted for getting a massage and more.
they say there is another more high profile person who also got busted.. does this stuff upset you that some men have gone into a massage parlor for possibly more than a massage?
?.
-
-
-
191
Diversity is White Genocide
by corrie54 inasia for the asians, africa for the africans, white countries for everybody!.
everybody says there is this race problem.
everybody says this race problem will be solved when the third world pours into every white country and only into white countries.. the netherlands and belgium are just as crowded as japan or taiwan, but nobody says japan or taiwan will solve this race problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.. everybody says the final solution to this race problem is for every white country and only white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.. what if i said there was this race problem and this race problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into every black country and only into black countries?.
-
-
fulltimestudent
For the sake of accuracy and the lesson we can learn from it!
Quote: "The Roman empire eroded too, eventually to the point of schism, but that didn't stop humanity evolving culturally, and look where we are today in comparison to then."
The Roman empire did not end until 1453 when the Ottoman army broke into the city of Constantinople (Byzantium also called by some, New Rome) and brought the final end to the Roman Empire. (That's unless you believe in a Eurocentric view of the world).
The Roman Emperor Constantine had selected this site for his new city he may have called 'New Rome and 330 CE is regarded as the start date. He did that for reasons that may be unclear. But certainly it was a more convenient location for a capital. (it may or may not have been recognised as 'the' capital for a few more decades). Old Rome fell to Germanic tribes in 330 and brought an end to what historian call the western Roman Empire. And from the perspective of Constantine's new religious policy, there were far more Christians in West Asia than in Europe. And, Asia was far more prosperous then than Europe.
So lets fast forward 1000+ years to the Islamic conquest of Constantinople, the citizens began to convert to Islam. Of course, this was just another step in the conversion of western Asia from Christianity to Islam.
Can we learn anything from that. Yes! History has trends and people who try to resist the trends may finish up the losers (like the 100s of Constantinople residents who fled to the great church, the Hagia Sophia, believing their god would protect them. He didn't! Sultan Mehmet II allowed his army a few days of pillaging, and that included killing 100s in the great church and the raping of women and young men within the church, No wonder some started to convert, No wonder that West Asian christianity became a spent force.
Would that western Roman empire have survived longer if it had tried some sort of accommodation with the Ottomans? There's no answer to that question, but maybe.
I've referred before to Pankaj Mishra's book, From the Ruins of Empire: The Revolt against the West and the remaking of Asia. Mishra describes the Asian trends that commenced as a result of European colonisation. We may want to seclude ourselves from these historical processes, but that may only delay the process and your kids may face a bigger problem,
That's why the present USA elite's China policy is a bad move. It would be wiser to just watch from the sidelines, the Chinese policy of attempting to bring modernity and prosperity to the rest of Asia and to Africa. If it fails, the west could still pick up the pieces. It would be even wiser to assist China in that process. If all the world becomes prosperous, those with the mindset we are discussing here could keep themselves locked up in their little communities and no else in the world will give a rat's arse about you.
Please excuse any typos, I have a bit of a sight problem and am awaiting an operation, and I havn't got time today to check carefully,
-
191
Diversity is White Genocide
by corrie54 inasia for the asians, africa for the africans, white countries for everybody!.
everybody says there is this race problem.
everybody says this race problem will be solved when the third world pours into every white country and only into white countries.. the netherlands and belgium are just as crowded as japan or taiwan, but nobody says japan or taiwan will solve this race problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.. everybody says the final solution to this race problem is for every white country and only white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.. what if i said there was this race problem and this race problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into every black country and only into black countries?.
-
-
fulltimestudent
Quote: A poster asks. "Where is the freckled ginger kid in this 100m final? Perhaps we are just not socialising ginger kids to believe they can run fast."
and illustrates the question with an image of African athletes at the winning post.
-----------------------
The reason why, West Africans are so athletic appears to be genetic. Their genes (for whatever reason) make it possible for them to excel in running.
Here;s the reason explained in a UK TImes discussion, (re-published in Rupert Murdoch's, The Australian.)
Quote: "Research undertaken in 2003 found that variation in a particular gene called ACTN3 is associated with sprinting success (through its impact on fast-twitch muscle fibres), and that the "sprint" version of this gene is more common among Jamaicans than other populations.
This led to headlines suggesting that Jamaican sprinting success is hereditary. A recent book by a leading French journalist has also made this claim.
But the reality is more complex. Although 98 per cent of Jamaicans have the relevant gene, so, too, do 82 per cent of Europeans. In other words, both these populations have a huge majority of individuals with an ACTN3 gene conducive to sprinting success.
Further research has found that Kenyans (who win distance events but have virtually no success in sprinting) have an even higher frequency of the relevant gene than Jamaicans.
It turns out that most of the genetic diversity within mankind is contained within racial groups, rather than between them. At these Olympics, blacks, who have often been under-represented in swimming events, have started making it into the US team.
It is possible, although not certain, that patterns of national dominance in swimming and athletics will change over time, as the popularity of different sports shift.
What is certain is that the very notion of "black" athletic superiority is deeply misguided." The Times.
Edited to add the reference link: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/genetic-research-shows-athletic-skill-is-not-a-black-and-white-issue/news-story/794c66e0c667e7db8af44edc852531fa
-
191
Diversity is White Genocide
by corrie54 inasia for the asians, africa for the africans, white countries for everybody!.
everybody says there is this race problem.
everybody says this race problem will be solved when the third world pours into every white country and only into white countries.. the netherlands and belgium are just as crowded as japan or taiwan, but nobody says japan or taiwan will solve this race problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.. everybody says the final solution to this race problem is for every white country and only white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.. what if i said there was this race problem and this race problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into every black country and only into black countries?.
-
-
fulltimestudent
Quote: "It’s interesting, yet not surprising that these beliefs were in the Kingdom Hall!!!"
I agree, but with some reservations. I suggest again that the underlying influence was 'culture.' I can only give two examples, so it's dangerous to suggest they prove anything. But it is interesting to see the different attitudes of missionaries from two different countries,
The first is Australian. Some Australian witnesses moved to Papua-New Guinea to serve. An Australian newspaper, writing on contemporary P-NG thought that the church group with Australian missionaries in P-NG, were the only missionaries that looked comfortable sitting on the ground, in a mud hut, with indigenous people who seldom washed and who smeared themselves with pig fat, which also stank. BUT, the one Australian who I knew personally, told me that he stayed in P-NG for less than a year, simply because he could not stand that over-powering stench, It is my belief that whatever success the witnesses had in P-NG was due to John Cutforth, a Canadian Gilead graduate who had one of the warmest personlities you could imagine, and who could thrive in the stench of pig-vat and human B.O. That story illustrates the role of culture. On Australian could not adjust his cultural settings, the other witness, John Cutforth, was a man who could adjust his cultural settings.
The other story is Taiwain. Again, this story is from many years ago, The JW work in Taiwan was progressing slowly. I asked an Australian missionary working in Taiwan what may be the reason for that? His response was that most missionaries in Taiwan were Americans and kept trying (in his words) to turn the Chinese converts into 'little Americans.' In his opinion, they should have focused on beliefs and not attempted to change their culture.
-
191
Diversity is White Genocide
by corrie54 inasia for the asians, africa for the africans, white countries for everybody!.
everybody says there is this race problem.
everybody says this race problem will be solved when the third world pours into every white country and only into white countries.. the netherlands and belgium are just as crowded as japan or taiwan, but nobody says japan or taiwan will solve this race problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.. everybody says the final solution to this race problem is for every white country and only white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.. what if i said there was this race problem and this race problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into every black country and only into black countries?.
-
-
fulltimestudent
Quote: "FTS - you are equivocating. NOBODY is advocating Victorian attitudes of social Darwinism FFS."
Ummm, cofty, are you sure about that? A dictionary definition of equivocation is to use ambiguous language so as to conceal the truth or avoid committing oneself.
I clearly stated near the beginning of that post that I was presenting a history of racist thinking. I suggest that the era of British racism is close enough to our own era to influence our thinking, whether it is overt or subconsciously.
In my own country the White Australia policy persisted into the life memories of a generation that may still be active. Of course, few today advocate social Darwinism, its now a discredited concept, but to what extent does it influence the thinking of people who want to set a color/social bar to prevent undesirables moving into the neighbourhood?
So rather than 'hiding' anything my post should have illuminated your mind.
I also suggested in that post that the best word to describe what some are advocating is culture. The objection seems to be to strange customs (or culture). Of course, there may be other factors. Some years ago on a visit to Taiwan with a business friend, we were driven to a special lunch in a company car. On the way we had to pick up the President of the company. To get to his home we entered a gated community and had to pass another 4 checkpoints before reaching his home. The motive for this was surely economic. Only people of a certain status lived in that community.
I've seen a similar project in China, Only one checkpoint at the entrance, and only 20 homes. but essentially the same goal. On a guided tour by a friend (who knew of my interest in attempting to understand contemporary China), I was told that the President of large company would not live in that gated community, but the Vice-President could. This community also included a central 'club' house where the residents could entertain guests. Clearly another attempt to exclude persons of the wrong economic status.
I will continue my attempt to illustrate the origins of group related attempts to bar the wrong elements. The next on takes us into the far past.
-
64
What Do You Think of Socialism?
by minimus indo you support socialism?
is it something that you would want in your country?.
-
-
fulltimestudent
I read that there are some 500,000 bankruptcies a year in the USA, due to medical expenses. Is that true?
-
17
Question....Did Charles Russel Ever Finish High School?
by new boy ini saw john cedars show last night about when he visited the headquarters and this was mentioned.. this is the first i heard of this.
.
-
-
fulltimestudent
To try and apply modern practise in education to the nineteenth century is stupid, My parents only had 6 to 7 years of education. And, in Australia, the common school leaving age in the late 1940's was 14.
-
191
Diversity is White Genocide
by corrie54 inasia for the asians, africa for the africans, white countries for everybody!.
everybody says there is this race problem.
everybody says this race problem will be solved when the third world pours into every white country and only into white countries.. the netherlands and belgium are just as crowded as japan or taiwan, but nobody says japan or taiwan will solve this race problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.. everybody says the final solution to this race problem is for every white country and only white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.. what if i said there was this race problem and this race problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into every black country and only into black countries?.
-
-
fulltimestudent
Quote: " a threat to the indigenous population"
I wondered when I read, this, what parts of Europe still have the original indigenous population, extant?
As I;m sure you already know. the mass movement of people like the Huns westward caused massive population movements all across Europe.
-
191
Diversity is White Genocide
by corrie54 inasia for the asians, africa for the africans, white countries for everybody!.
everybody says there is this race problem.
everybody says this race problem will be solved when the third world pours into every white country and only into white countries.. the netherlands and belgium are just as crowded as japan or taiwan, but nobody says japan or taiwan will solve this race problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.. everybody says the final solution to this race problem is for every white country and only white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.. what if i said there was this race problem and this race problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into every black country and only into black countries?.
-
-
fulltimestudent
Race - 1
I think I'm wasting my time being involved in this, but .... The problem is the old problem, do you base your decisions in your life/mind on feelings or reason.
Here's some extracts from an ABC ( the aussie one) podcast on whether such a thing as 'race' exists,' I quote it just to start a history of racism.
I need to make one point first. There seems to be something built in to some primate animals. that regards with suspicion any group that's not your own group (more on that later) and no matter what the argued conclusions are. it does seem that most 'racist' arguments are likely based on that.feeling and not a reasoned conclusion,
But here's the comment I wanted to post now -
Quote: "Our modern ideas of race began with a Swedish botanist called Carl Linnaeaus who lived in the 18th century. Linnaeaus enjoyed classifying life on Earth, and he’s often described as the Father of Taxonomy. First, he grouped plants into particular categories, and then animals, which of course meant classifying primates, and eventually humans.
According to Darren Curnoe, an associate professor of human evolution at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Linnaeaus was the first to formally slice our species into four proposed races.
'He essentially recognised Europeans as a race, Mongoloids or East Asians, American—and he really thought of native Americans, and Africans,' says Curnoe.
A few decades later a German physician called Johann Friedrich Blumenbach added another category called Malays and, critically, he made a hierarchy.
'He put Caucasians at the top, followed by the Americans, followed by Mongoloids, followed by Africans,' says Curnoe.
The hierarchy was based on early European notions of beauty, personality, temperament and Blumenbach’s study of the shape of skulls."
Reference: https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/scienceshow/science-vs-podcast-asks:-does-race-exist/6525064
---------------------------------------------------------So are all you guys who arguing for a homogeneous.society/community/nation aware that's likely where your notions of 'race' started. Actually the differences you see in what you are calling 'racial groups' can better be described as, 'cultural.'
Although some western people like to think that it's all explained in the bible ((you know, the Jewish origin myths) its hardly an explanation of what is being discussed here.,
However, the concept of 'race' seems to have gotten a boost in the wake of European colonisation of various places in the world as (particularly the English) Europeans sought to justify what they were doing to other people. This is particularly important, because the migrations that are being complained about basically have an economic foundation,
A clear exposition of the process may be found in John M. Hobson's* Book, :The Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation, particularly ch. 10 - Constructing European racisst identity and the invention of the world, 1700-1859: the imperial civilising mission as a moral vocation.
During the nineteenth century, social Darwinists claimed that 'the Anglo-saxon race had a duty to take over the world' because 'the inferior races of the world were going to become extinct' (hence the use of Darwin's name) and 'progess and civilisation was safe only in the hands of the British.'
If you attempted to chart this notion you would chart three groups of nations/race. First would be the 'Civilised' peoples of the First World ( at term still used). At the top of this group was Britain, followed by various other Western European nations Then came the Barbaric peoples, The Ottomon empire, the Chinese empire, Japan, Siam, and finally the Savage group, including African peoples etc. Much of what our contemporary western culture believes originated in that nineteenth century process.
* John Montagu Hobson, is a political scientist, international relations scholar and academic. Currently he is Professor of Politics and International Relations at the University of Sheffield. This John Hobson Is the great grandson of John A Hobson.(if that matters)
-
64
What Do You Think of Socialism?
by minimus indo you support socialism?
is it something that you would want in your country?.
-
-
fulltimestudent
I'm ha-haing at the moment. Why? Because understanding that the collective mind-set in the USA is anti-socialism, a results of the decades of propaganda in which the USA saw the Soviet Union as its big enemy.
But aome time back I read an article (now lost in my jumbled files) describing how the US government party often used pork barreling as a way to win votes. If a certain congressional district was failing economically, this writer claimed that the government would often spend some money in that area via its ability to spend money on military projects. The writer called it, "Military Socialism."
I've never gone into the 'truthiness' of that claim. Is it correct?