@mikeflood: I don’t think he’ll resign even if impeached. And, honestly, even if we were talking about a Democrat as President, I would really hope that pressure over partisan fights wouldn’t be a catalyst for resigning. If that happens it would basically mean there is a “hecklers veto” on the Presidency. Not good.
MeanMrMustard
JoinedPosts by MeanMrMustard
-
242
Do You Think President Trump Will Be Impeached?
by minimus inwhether you like him or not.... it doesn’t matter.
do you think he will be impeached?
?.
-
-
-
242
Do You Think President Trump Will Be Impeached?
by minimus inwhether you like him or not.... it doesn’t matter.
do you think he will be impeached?
?.
-
-
MeanMrMustard
Trump may be impeached. They left might get the votes to start the process. Now, I don’t think this “blue wave” is real, but we’ll see.
If he is impeached, the Democrats in the House of Representatives will have to come up with some Articles of Impeachment. They will have to put it in writing and vote on it. This is where it will get nuts. What are they going to put? Likely stuff similar to what Coded Logic has stated - things like obstruction, foreign donations, and probably “collusion” which is not a crime. However, they can add it to the list because this is a political function. So let’s say they do that, and because they took the House, they will line up along party lines, never looking at the evidence, and just vote for it.
Now the real shit show begins ... Because from there it goes to the Senate for a “trial”. I added the quotation marks because it’s not like a criminal trial, it’s a political function.
Nevertheless, to actually remove the president, you need a 2/3 vote in the Senate, which the Democrats will simply not have. But in the mean time the trial will be public. And the networks won’t be able to hide it. They will talk about obstruction, and we’ll get to hear over and over again how it was NOT obstruction to fire Comey. He was partisan, and probably leaked classified data. Then it will move into collusion, and well get to hear how there is actually NO evidence for it, that it’s not even a crime, but if it were, you should be locking Clinton up for it.
It will be a total disaster for the Democrats. But they are too crazed to see it.
-
242
Do You Think President Trump Will Be Impeached?
by minimus inwhether you like him or not.... it doesn’t matter.
do you think he will be impeached?
?.
-
-
MeanMrMustard
We need people in office that are chosen by the electorate. Not an illegitimate President appointed by Putin.
You mean, people didn’t actually vote for Trump?! Gasp... scandal. Putin changed or manufactured votes??!!! Oh my.
-
242
Do You Think President Trump Will Be Impeached?
by minimus inwhether you like him or not.... it doesn’t matter.
do you think he will be impeached?
?.
-
-
MeanMrMustard
2: If Trump broke the law
-
242
Do You Think President Trump Will Be Impeached?
by minimus inwhether you like him or not.... it doesn’t matter.
do you think he will be impeached?
?.
-
-
MeanMrMustard
1. If Trump obstructed justice (this is what Nixon got kicked out of office for)
The first one, to me, seems to be blatantly obvious.
lol. Yes, clearly.
#BringBackComey
-
97
Alex Jones, Infowars Ban on Youtube, FB and other platforms
by pleaseresearch inwhat are you thoughts on this?.
i find this alarming because jones was very outspoken and had great guests on discussing topics most other media outlets wouldn't go near.. the fact that many have restricted him access to their medium what does this say on our freedoms of speech?.
-
-
MeanMrMustard
Aannnnd it’s getting worse.
Robert Spencer (not to be confused with the leftist racist Richard Spencer) had his patreon account closed because of demands from MasterCard!
A false flag attempt on Molyneux’s channel today. The strikes came from videos that you wouldn’t even suspect are an issue. Incredible. Take down didn’t work as fans started messaging YouTube group on Twitter. -
286
Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Baker Who Refused to Bake Cake for Gay Couple
by Simon inseems like such an obviously correct decision to overturn the previous overreach - it should never have been necessary to go to the supreme court but happened because the rights of the religious were being ignored.. as the fundamental level, no one should be able to compel you to work for them or to provide services that go against your beliefs, and certainly not have the government be able to force you to comply.. if this was allowed there would be so many unreconcilable situations that would clog up courts over nonsense.. i also have little patience for these activists that intentionally look to be offended.
it really doesn't do their cause any good to go round looking to make trouble for people.
it's also misguided because it ends up strengthening religious rights over effectively stupid issues.. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/04/us/politics/supreme-court-sides-with-baker-who-turned-away-gay-couple.html.
-
-
-
286
Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Baker Who Refused to Bake Cake for Gay Couple
by Simon inseems like such an obviously correct decision to overturn the previous overreach - it should never have been necessary to go to the supreme court but happened because the rights of the religious were being ignored.. as the fundamental level, no one should be able to compel you to work for them or to provide services that go against your beliefs, and certainly not have the government be able to force you to comply.. if this was allowed there would be so many unreconcilable situations that would clog up courts over nonsense.. i also have little patience for these activists that intentionally look to be offended.
it really doesn't do their cause any good to go round looking to make trouble for people.
it's also misguided because it ends up strengthening religious rights over effectively stupid issues.. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/04/us/politics/supreme-court-sides-with-baker-who-turned-away-gay-couple.html.
-
-
MeanMrMustard
When you provide a service or product to the general public you loose some of your individual liberty right?
No. Please tell me why his property is no longer his property just because he owns a business.
This is the problem we run into with protected classes of people. What happens when one protected class clash with another? That’s a clear indication the entire idea should be thrown away. Why can’t we just have freedom of association? He doesn’t want to make the cake. Whatever the reason is irrelevant ... just go somewhere else.
-
97
Alex Jones, Infowars Ban on Youtube, FB and other platforms
by pleaseresearch inwhat are you thoughts on this?.
i find this alarming because jones was very outspoken and had great guests on discussing topics most other media outlets wouldn't go near.. the fact that many have restricted him access to their medium what does this say on our freedoms of speech?.
-
-
MeanMrMustard
Interesting perspective: Tom Woods and Michael Malice. I see this happening with bitchute.com now.
Another interesting video (only 9 min) from YouTuber Law:
It seems like as long as section 230 of Communication and Decency Act is Law, it will near impossible to fight back legally. But this might be OK - see first vid.
-
97
Alex Jones, Infowars Ban on Youtube, FB and other platforms
by pleaseresearch inwhat are you thoughts on this?.
i find this alarming because jones was very outspoken and had great guests on discussing topics most other media outlets wouldn't go near.. the fact that many have restricted him access to their medium what does this say on our freedoms of speech?.
-
-
MeanMrMustard
@Wasanelder: Is that Pelosi? It looks like Pelosi...