He's a little late to the game - the JWs have been denouncing the likes of him for over a hundred years.
MMM
the pope denounced jehovah's witnesses in a televized interview on sunday 11th may .read more here.
http://jwdoctrine.com/pope-denounces-jehovahs-witnesses/.
*if you make a friend on facebook ,my posts will appear on your timeline automatically .don't worry if you don't i will understand*.
He's a little late to the game - the JWs have been denouncing the likes of him for over a hundred years.
MMM
the late christopher hitchens decribed the word islamophobia as "created by fascists, and used by cowards, to manipulate morons.. please take half an hour to read a fascinating conversation between sam harris and ayaan hirsi ali.. ayaan is an apostate from islam.
she fled to the netherlands in '92 to escape an arranged marriage and went on to become a member of the dutch government from 2003-2006.. ayaan is now a fellow with the future of diplomacy project at the belfer center for science and international affairs at the harvard kennedy school... she lives with round-the-clock security.. "some moderate muslims hate meand yes, thats a strong word, but i think what theyve said supports itbecause i make them feel uncomfortable.
the things i talk about put them in a state of dissonance that they cant live with.
I think a distinction needs to be made: There is a difference between Islam and Mulims. In every religion, you will have some people that don't know a lot about the teachings, and yet still claim membership. You will have some people that go to the church/mosque/KH and watch the leaders preach about what they should be doing according to God, and then go home, eat, and don't do any of what the preacher/preist/s heikh/elder said to do.
But that doesn't change the ideology, it doesn't change the distinction. Just because there are more moderate Muslims, doesn't mean the ideology isn't violent. I am worried that the "extremeists" are simply the Muslims that are following their religion, and the "moderate" Muslims are the ones that are choosing to ignore parts of their religion/political system.
MMM
http://www.tylervigen.com/.
these are some funny correlations... which of course are not causations!!.
enjoy!
This is my favorite. If you have ever done any web development, then this represents 100% causation :
MMM
for those of you who live in truly first world countries (uk, australia, canada, etc etc) you can skip this.
for those of us stuck in the usa, not a first world country at all, please feel free to read on.. i've done my best to be fiscally responsible my whole life.
i bought my first house at age 25. and because of having a little loot to protect and not wanting to end up in some overcrowded emergency room waiting hours to be seen by doogie howser, i purchased health insurance.
jgnat,
You don't have to be as convinced as I am.
You did respond to the video, but my intent was not to imply that you didn't repsond, or that even your response wasn't sufficient. I felt that a response in this thread was a good idea because, surprisingly, even from a free market perpective, the vlogbrothers video is not far off. The problems are there - but it's the "therefore we have to do XYZ" that troubles me.
You wrote in the other thread (you have to go to page 16):
The Vlog brothers always talk fast. They have a self-imposed limit of five minutes, and they cram in as much as they can. They are also factual.
I fail to see how you have concluded from all this that too much government intervention has led to rising prices. Canada has loads more government intervention, and our costs are lower. As does Europe. As the brother says so well, it's the loaded gun to your head - inelastic demand - that leads to high prices.
By the time you said that, the user DogGone was discussing inelastic demand with me. Our discussion then went on to patents.
MMM
the finish minister of justice has publicly attacked the practice of judicial committees in her country which are in violation with the basic rights and freedoms enjoyed from citizens in her country .read the full article here :.
finland attacks judicial committees.
please like and share article so more get to see it!.
jgnat had an interesting post that I glossed over:
Didn't the old USSR allow dissidents to leave but they had to leave their families behind? That's surely breaking a human right; severing natural familial bonds.
Assuming the USSR did this (let's assume for the sake of the argument), then I would agree there was a rights violation. But I don't think it is comparable to the WT. It seems like it is on the surface because to walk away from the WT is like walking away from your family. However, the difference here is that the USSR is forcing the family to stay within the country. In the case of the WT, the family chooses to stay. In the example above, the USSR would not be violating the dissident's right to association, rather it is the rest of the family's right to association that is being violoated.
MMM
police and other security services have been handed a list of banned books that they will seek to remove and destroy in raids planned for the future in azerbaijan.the list mostly contains muslim texts and books such as those by dr. said nursi a muslim theologian.
i addition , this list contains .... .
read the rest of the post here.
Sucks to live there..
for those of you who live in truly first world countries (uk, australia, canada, etc etc) you can skip this.
for those of us stuck in the usa, not a first world country at all, please feel free to read on.. i've done my best to be fiscally responsible my whole life.
i bought my first house at age 25. and because of having a little loot to protect and not wanting to end up in some overcrowded emergency room waiting hours to be seen by doogie howser, i purchased health insurance.
jgnat,
I responded to the video you posted above (vlogbrothers) in a previous thread. I agreed with most of what he said, but I don't see that as an all out reason to go into single payer. Here is what I said in that other thread, since that thread was very long:
Your first video: (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSjGouBmo0M&feature=player_embedded) - I did watch it but I did not comment on it. The maker of the video (vlogbrothers) fires off many many points, hard and fast. It makes it tough to respond to everything there. However, since I agree with a lot of what he says, it is somewhat easier. I have no reason to really disagree; he is right, we spend way too much on healthcare. The problem is not over utilization, it is not that we are inherently sicker, and it is not because things just cost a lot here. I keep bringing it up that people aught to ask why it costs so much, not attempt to just pay for it. I also do not think it is because of inelastic demand. It is because we have systematically, over a long time, gone away from the free market and caused all sorts of distortions in the pricing mechanism.
One interesting point - he mentions malpractice insurance somewhere around minute 4. He states that it can't be that either because Texas enacted Tort reform (although I don't know the details, I can assume it was meaningful reform for the sake of the argument) and the cost of healthcare fell only 0.1%. I have no reason to disagree, after all, what is pushing the price down? It is not enough just to remove the barrier for the price to fall, you must also have a meaningful market with competition to push down the prices. That doesn't happen the way we currently do things (employer based insurance or medicare or medicaid).
I think the point I've been trying hard to make is that the way things are now - as messed up as they are - have come about by a process, a process that started with wage controls during WWII, and continued on to today. More and more of the free market was replaced with subsidies, distortions, or special privileges....
MMM
for those of you who live in truly first world countries (uk, australia, canada, etc etc) you can skip this.
for those of us stuck in the usa, not a first world country at all, please feel free to read on.. i've done my best to be fiscally responsible my whole life.
i bought my first house at age 25. and because of having a little loot to protect and not wanting to end up in some overcrowded emergency room waiting hours to be seen by doogie howser, i purchased health insurance.
@ctrwtf:
I have said it here before, and I still believe: The problem is not the market. A true market would help matters. We spend too little time asking why the cost of health services is so expensive and instead focus on just figuring out a way of paying for it. There are good economic reasons why some (including me) oppose the ACA, as well as single payer programs. It is not just partisan politics. There are also good economic reasons why the consumers must be attached to the cost in some way (see link below).
That's the back story. Now the reason for my rant is that a-hole Republicans still are fuming about so-called Obamacare. I find it ironic that the party that touts personal responsibility doesn't want to part with a nickel to be personally responsible about their own health needs. "I'm young and don't need health insurance." Really? If you get in an accident or need your appendix removed it's going to cost anywhere from 50K to a million bucks. Do you have that cash floating around? "No, but I'll pay it off over time." Guess what Einstein? The hospital is going to send you to collections in three months time then write off the loss and pass the cost on to the next consumer. That said consumer being me, the guy that pays for health insurance at an inflated rate to cover your irresponsibility. Now let me state for the record at this point, I'm not mad about those that because of personal circumstances cannot afford to be responsible for their own needs. I'm mad at people that complain that the govt is forcing them to be responsible. BTW, republicans have yet to forward ANY ideas to solve this enormous issue.
I try to view the issue outside of the Republican/Democrat framework. But I wonder if you are viewing a free market solution as a lack of solution - as if the only valid solutions are in the domain of new government programs? So, when a more conservative Republican tries to speak about returning to a market, you feel he/she would just like to undermine the current law that was, at least, an attempt to fix things. I do agree, we have a messed up healthcare system now, but we are far from a real market.
Personally, I think the best healthcare systems in the world are single payer, govt sponsored. But if you dare to forward that idea, you get the inevitable, "Ya, but people from all over the world come to the USA for advanced medical treatment maaaan." Okay, less than a handful fo people come here every year for some exotic treatment. Meanwhile, life expectancy in every other first world country is surpassing the good ole US of A. They're also spending less per capita on medical treatment.
I don’t give that response normally. We went down this path about 8 months ago. Take a look at this thread, starting on pp. 11. I defend a free market in health care, with much of the same responses.
http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/social/current/262749/11/So-are-Republicans-now-openly-terrorists
Incidentally, that thread was also ragging on Republicans. There’s not much difference between the two parties these days.
When consumers are separated from the cost (the price), it means that they aren’t paying attention to the information conveyed within that price. The doctor too doesn’t get a good view of the real demand. It looks inflated because a rich single payer is paying for the increase in care usage. There will be an expansion for sure, and prices will rise. The incentive to expand comes from more money flooding into the system, whereas, if a prices were to fall from a real market, the expansion would come from actual demand (people being able to afford the care). In time, prices will continue to rise - after all, what keeps them from rising? Demand looks off the chart to the providers, and the price will rise. Eventually, it will have to stop. Price fixing (which will cause shortages) or rationing will start to occur.
To be fair to all those people (you make them sound like hippies ... maaan.. :) ) telling these stories of coming to the USA, it makes a lot sense. Once the rationing kicks in, you might find yourself on a waiting list for an important procedure, one that really can’t wait.
I'm not sure if this is the forum for such a secular discussion. But I wiil say that the dubs as a people could care less about being fiscally responsible. Janitors and pioneers don't usually have enough to spend on such things as personal responsibility. Maybe they should purchase some "miracle wheat" to deal with what ails them.
I don’t know about that. I know a lot of currently active JWs that are fiscally responsible, on matters of health care and otherwise. On matters of health care, they too are dealing with the increased cost like everyone else.
MMM
or do you believe they have the right to practice their religion, as they do?.
No.
MMM
the finish minister of justice has publicly attacked the practice of judicial committees in her country which are in violation with the basic rights and freedoms enjoyed from citizens in her country .read the full article here :.
finland attacks judicial committees.
please like and share article so more get to see it!.
Band on the Run,
You are right to mention this. This thread started out about Finland, but that not where the thread is now.
MMM