Hi losingit,
"End of Mysteries-- you have me curious. Id like to read the Bible in a scholarly way. I dont want to read it as a way to confirm or deny my faith in God."
I have read a couple interesting books by scholars about the Bible. Misquoting Jesus by Bart Ehrman and Who Wrote The Bible by Richard Friedman. Both books made me think much more about the material I was reading. It also made me think of time elements, just like one can easily quote a news source, but one cannot predict a future headline. These things can give you clues about who is writing and what is their concern. Having a goal to your reading, will make it more enjoyable. Nonetheless the material is from an ancient source and the reading can get tedious.
As soon as someone points out even the most simple thing, like Genesis 1:1 to 2:3 calls refers to God as 'God' (Elohim) and at 2:4 there is a switch to calling God, 'Jehovah', the reading does become more fun. Even contemporary issues like same-sex marriage are interesting to consider when looking more deeply at the actual text people sometimes quote.
Lev 20:12 condemns man with daughter-in-law sex, assigning it a death sentence.
Lev 20:13 condemns man with man sex, assigning it a death sentence.
So, why isn't woman with son-in-law sex directly condemned?
So, why isn't woman with woman sex condemend?
This lack of symmetry seems odd, but very well might be hinting at underlying concerns of the author. I added "directly" in my first question, because Lev 20:14 condems man with woman and her mother sex, assigning death by fire.
Cheers,
-Randy