i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
Yeah, I am also bored with the discussion.
I don't know if you learned anything, you seem too arrogant. Maybe you should read up on the tings you like to think you have schooled me.
This shit would not fly in a formal debate, or maybe it would, those are usually about saving face...
i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
Your logic is crappy is not an insult?
So, your brain is stupid. Is not an insult?
Or, your face is ugly?
Your inability to use your brain?
i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
Don't blame me for your lack of ability to construct an argument
is directed at my intellect.
These are examples of fanciful ways of calling someone "stupid" or "idiot"...
i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
referring to my logic as "crappy"
Crappy logic. Your problem, not mine.
Is a perfect example of a ad hominem fallacy, as it is directed at my intellect.
i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
I have. But your claim was that you knew my opinion. That's an ignorant claim and faulty premise.
Not when you made your opinion very clear...
i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
I am sorry to say but after discussing with you at length.
Straw men arguments, personal attacks, play with words, avoiding the question/issue, ad hominem.
I conclude that you are a very knowledgeable idiot.
(Not in the insulting sense of the word.)
i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
You're making an incorrect assumption about me as your premise.
No, you have expressed issues with my logic several times.
i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
Ramifications are conclusions or results. You asked a question. Poor use of wording and using words to mean something they don't, more evidence showing your accusations false. Thank you for playing.
(it's also another example of a class error in logic, since you mentioned posting example of bad logic I thought I would help you out)
All of these are perfect examples of: ad hominem.
You are avoiding the question/questions.
i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
Well, first you'd have to show a single instance of that. Good luck in your quest.
LOL, when you argue against a point I am making, your opinion is probably that there is a logical or factual problem with it.
Same with me, that's why we discuss, to make the other person see their error.
We would both be of the opinion that the other person is illogical/making illogical statements.
What you are saying is based on your opinion. So would my "insults" be.
i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
Atheist vs. Agnostic is like arguing Scotch vs. Bourbon. They both come to fruition in similar but different methods. In the end, they both get the job done.
I know what you are saying, but have you considered that theists can be Agnostic too?
