vincent tool said that he is exclusively working the phones for child abuse cases, but never said he is not the only one.
for now, let's assume the rate of abuse cases averages over time to the three or four cases he gets per month.
let's further assume that, since he isn't the only person working the phones and is on vacation at some point, the number is 4-5 per month, or 4.5 per month.
I was thinking the same thing.
68 000 publishers = 4.5 each month or 54 that year.
1971 there where around 23 000 publishers which would be around 1.5 each month or 18 that year.
54+18=72
72*22=1584
So since 1971 (44 years) there should have been around 1584 phone calls regarding this issue to the legal department. (if the number is consistent and if the requirement to contact the legal department had been in place)
i give you day 7 of the royal commissions proceedings:.
part 1 has been uploaded and part 2 and 3 will soon be available.. part 1:.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk0lgqedy_i.
I know right, I had to pick that one when I saw it :P
(there are 3 pictures to choose from when you upload a video to YouTube)
i give you day 7 of the royal commissions proceedings:.
part 1 has been uploaded and part 2 and 3 will soon be available.. part 1:.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk0lgqedy_i.
You're welcome
i give you day 7 of the royal commissions proceedings:.
part 1 has been uploaded and part 2 and 3 will soon be available.. part 1:.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk0lgqedy_i.
Part 2 uploaded, it will take a little while before 1080p becomes available as YouTube processes the video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ss0ATxijmaQ&feature=youtu.be
i give you day 7 of the royal commissions proceedings:.
part 1 has been uploaded and part 2 and 3 will soon be available.. part 1:.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk0lgqedy_i.
The questioning about if women are capable of taking on the role as an elders, made me thing about this video with a talk given by Samuel Herd:
i give you day 7 of the royal commissions proceedings:.
part 1 has been uploaded and part 2 and 3 will soon be available.. part 1:.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk0lgqedy_i.
I give you day 7 of the Royal Commissions proceedings:
Part 1 has been uploaded and part 2 and 3 will soon be available.
Part 1:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QK0LgqEdY_I
(It will take a little while before 1080p becomes available as YouTube processes the video.)
Playlist of the entire hearing so far:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLPQ6KZ-AGhVQbadlzMQN26dvMPzddxlui
Playlist of the hearing with synced audio, more will be added later:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLPQ6KZ-AGhVRhA0EyktgPEEoMlS_B2J7I
Original stream link:
Enjoy! 
wednesday 5 , day 7 live hearing.
case study 29, july 2015, sydney.
wednesday 5 , day 7 live hearing.
case study 29, july 2015, sydney.
Found it: http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/2004846
Watchtower 15th November 2004
When a Witness Is Wise
“A faithful witness is one that will not lie,” continues Solomon, “but a false witness launches forth mere lies.” (Proverbs 14:5) The lies of a false witness certainly can do much harm. Naboth the Jezreelite was stoned to death because two good-for-nothing men falsely testified against him. (1 Kings 21:7-13) And did not false witnesses come forward against Jesus, leading to his death? (Matthew 26:59-61) False witnesses also testified against Stephen—the first disciple of Jesus to be killed because of his faith.—Acts 6:10, 11.
A man of untruth may go unexposed for the time being, but consider his future. Jehovah hates “a false witness that launches forth lies,” states the Bible. (Proverbs 6:16-19) Such a man’s portion will be in the lake that burns with fire and sulfur—the second death—along with such wrongdoers as murderers, fornicators, and idolaters.—Revelation 21:8.
The faithful witness does not commit perjury when testifying. His testimony is not tainted with lies. However, this does not mean that he is under obligation to give full information to those who may want to bring harm to Jehovah’s people in some way. The patriarchs Abraham and Isaac withheld facts from some who did not worship Jehovah. (Genesis 12:10-19; 20:1-18; 26:1-10) Rahab of Jericho misdirected the king’s men. (Joshua 2:1-7) Jesus Christ himself refrained from divulging total information when doing so would have caused needless harm. (John 7:1-10) He said: “Do not give what is holy to dogs, neither throw your pearls before swine.” Why not? So that “they may never . . . turn around and rip you open.”—Matthew 7:6.
wednesday 5 , day 7 live hearing.
case study 29, july 2015, sydney.
Also, Morrits (sp?) is 90 years old and knows what the letter mentioning a "list" actually meant. If these cases go back to 1950 then I'm sure the list back then was kept on hardcopy. To say there's no list because there's no printout would be obfuscating the issue.
Sounds like the time when they said that they could not comply with the subpoena in the US. Because the files where mixed in with all the other files and it would take years to subtract the child abuse files :P
wednesday 5 , day 7 live hearing.
case study 29, july 2015, sydney.
So this is how they solve the problem with the elders shifting the blame on the branch. They blame each other :P
Legal department: "That's the service departments area"
Service department: "That's the legal departments area"
