i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
Ramifications are conclusions or results. You asked a question. Poor use of wording and using words to mean something they don't, more evidence showing your accusations false. Thank you for playing.
(it's also another example of a class error in logic, since you mentioned posting example of bad logic I thought I would help you out)
All of these are perfect examples of: ad hominem.
You are avoiding the question/questions.
i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
Well, first you'd have to show a single instance of that. Good luck in your quest.
LOL, when you argue against a point I am making, your opinion is probably that there is a logical or factual problem with it.
Same with me, that's why we discuss, to make the other person see their error.
We would both be of the opinion that the other person is illogical/making illogical statements.
What you are saying is based on your opinion. So would my "insults" be.
i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
Atheist vs. Agnostic is like arguing Scotch vs. Bourbon. They both come to fruition in similar but different methods. In the end, they both get the job done.
I know what you are saying, but have you considered that theists can be Agnostic too?
i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
Yeah, I've been saying that all along. Try and keep up.
I wont bother showing you quotes where you expressed other opinions...
Since you finally (In my opinion) understood this, lets look at the ramifications.
Would you agree that since plants are atheists, body parts are atheist to?
i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
You don't need to keep sniffing poop to know that it's going to keep stinking.
I could say the same for your illogical reasoning, but I don't bring it up at every opportunity as I consider it rude...
But if you want us sink to that level...
i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
Let me net it out for you since there seems to be confusion. Plants can't ever not lack a belief in god. Babies, at the stage of their development, do not currently posses the ability to have a belief in god and thus lack a belief in god.
Both lack belief in god.
"Both lack belief in god."
Hence, both are atheist.
i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
If by poor wording you are talking about your post I would agree, although everything I've seen of your argument suggests that the poor wording is merely a reflection of the lack of cogency you put into it's formulation.
Then maybe you should look some more...
i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
Evidence that your accusation against me of playing word games is false.
I have accused you of it when I found it appropriate, i did not accuse you of it in that case.
i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
Wow, the logic train really did leave you at the station!
Poor wording, it is about conceiving of something you don't know.
i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
Whats the difference then:
Plants are atheist by necessity since they lack even the ability to have and belief in god and thus the belief itself.
Babies lack belief in god.
Also, are you suggesting that babies have the ability to believe in God but choose not to?
