I liked Clinton, and I think once again he is going to save the Dems from themselves.
Terry
bill clinton on bush uranium line: 'everybody makes mistakes' former president accepts explanation on state of the union
wednesday, july 23, 2003 posted: 1:31 pm edt (1731 gmt).
washington (cnn) -- the white house, attacked by critics for a now-retracted line about iraq seeking uranium from africa in president bush's state of the union address, has gotten some surprising support from former president clinton.. "i thought the white house did the right thing in just saying 'we probably shouldn't have said that,' " clinton told cnn's larry king in a phone interview tuesday evening.
I liked Clinton, and I think once again he is going to save the Dems from themselves.
Terry
.
cnn is reporting that saddam's sons, oudai and qusay are confirmed to be dead.
.
Remember though nothing rehabilitates as well as a M-16.
Terry
anytime something went wrong in the world with an individual, they would use them as example over and over and over again.. the most common one i heard was brother a got into big trouble with __________ (insert problem here, pick any one), see this is what happens when you leave the organization.. so how many jw's will be saying ............. "did you hear what happened to kobe, big successful athlete, see he didn't have god's organization and satan got him.".
i wonder how many jw parents especially in the la area will make their kids stop wearing number 8. he did and admit to committing adultrey.
sexual assault, i don't think so.
An interesting aspect to this is that if he does not go to jail this might help his career. Kobe is able to demand only a fraction of the money other NBA stars demand for endorsements because he is seen as having no ‘street cred’. His endorsement for addidas did not move very many units and is seen as an advertising failure. With a dirty little trial, maybe his ‘street cred’ will increase so he can get 100 million dollar deals from companies similar to the deal that this years #1 pick (Levar James I think is his name) got.
Terry
if you were the president of the us, would you confront north korea or would you try to make a deal with them to reduce tensions.. north korea warns us: we can produce six atom bombsby rupert cornwell in washington.
16 july 2003 .
the crisis over north korea's nuclear weapons programme deepened yesterday as the north claimed it had made enough plutonium for six atomic bombs, and a former us defence secretary warned that the two countries could be at war by the end of the year.. the latest claim from pyongyang was communicated to the bush administration last week, three months after north korea said it was beginning to reprocess 8,000 spent nuclear fuel rods that were under united nations seal until the un inspectors were ejected from the country at the end of 2002.. us intelligence agencies are now trying to determine whether the boast is true or merely another bluff by the reclusive stalinist regime.. either way, the declaration has pushed the us president a step nearer deciding whether to accede to north korea's demand for direct negotiations - and thus drop his previous insistence that he would never bow to "nuclear blackmail" - or to accelerate plans for a military strike against the north's nuclear installations.. that spectre was raised yesterday by william perry, defence secretary under president clinton, when he told the washington post that the bush administration was "losing control" of the situation.. mr perry is a specialist on korea who helped prepare the military action which mr clinton came close to launching against yongbyon and other key north korean sites in 1994. he now fears that the north is not only close to a nuclear test to show the world it is a nuclear power, but also that it could sell a weapon to a terrorist group for use against the us.. "the nuclear programme now under way in north korea poses an imminent danger of nuclear weapons being detonated in american cities," mr perry said, adding that he had reached that conclusion after talks with bush officials in washington, and with senior figures in china and south korea.. china, reckoned to have the greatest leverage over of kim jong il's renegade state, launched a new effort this week to draw the north into regional talks to defuse the crisis, but mr perry told the washington post that as far as he could see, the "diplomatic track is inconsequential" and going nowhere.. the korean crisis has been largely ignored as washington has focused almost exclusively on iraq.
If you euro's need to understand bullying why not just look at they way you have treated Jews for the past few hundred years. How many synagogs burned in france in the last three years?
Terry of the all euros suck class
if you were the president of the us, would you confront north korea or would you try to make a deal with them to reduce tensions.. north korea warns us: we can produce six atom bombsby rupert cornwell in washington.
16 july 2003 .
the crisis over north korea's nuclear weapons programme deepened yesterday as the north claimed it had made enough plutonium for six atomic bombs, and a former us defence secretary warned that the two countries could be at war by the end of the year.. the latest claim from pyongyang was communicated to the bush administration last week, three months after north korea said it was beginning to reprocess 8,000 spent nuclear fuel rods that were under united nations seal until the un inspectors were ejected from the country at the end of 2002.. us intelligence agencies are now trying to determine whether the boast is true or merely another bluff by the reclusive stalinist regime.. either way, the declaration has pushed the us president a step nearer deciding whether to accede to north korea's demand for direct negotiations - and thus drop his previous insistence that he would never bow to "nuclear blackmail" - or to accelerate plans for a military strike against the north's nuclear installations.. that spectre was raised yesterday by william perry, defence secretary under president clinton, when he told the washington post that the bush administration was "losing control" of the situation.. mr perry is a specialist on korea who helped prepare the military action which mr clinton came close to launching against yongbyon and other key north korean sites in 1994. he now fears that the north is not only close to a nuclear test to show the world it is a nuclear power, but also that it could sell a weapon to a terrorist group for use against the us.. "the nuclear programme now under way in north korea poses an imminent danger of nuclear weapons being detonated in american cities," mr perry said, adding that he had reached that conclusion after talks with bush officials in washington, and with senior figures in china and south korea.. china, reckoned to have the greatest leverage over of kim jong il's renegade state, launched a new effort this week to draw the north into regional talks to defuse the crisis, but mr perry told the washington post that as far as he could see, the "diplomatic track is inconsequential" and going nowhere.. the korean crisis has been largely ignored as washington has focused almost exclusively on iraq.
To say NK is simple rearming as a response to America worldwide actions is mindless. NK has been arming itself for years, way before Bush’s time. Clinton tried to buy them off in the 90’s with black mail money an aid package but that only worked for a while. As I stated before we should pressure China, NK’s true master and NK is only a threat to SK. I just had to respond to this idea that NK had simple started to rearm due to Bush’s actions, another wonderful quote from the America bad everyone else good club.
Terry
if you were the president of the us, would you confront north korea or would you try to make a deal with them to reduce tensions.. north korea warns us: we can produce six atom bombsby rupert cornwell in washington.
16 july 2003 .
the crisis over north korea's nuclear weapons programme deepened yesterday as the north claimed it had made enough plutonium for six atomic bombs, and a former us defence secretary warned that the two countries could be at war by the end of the year.. the latest claim from pyongyang was communicated to the bush administration last week, three months after north korea said it was beginning to reprocess 8,000 spent nuclear fuel rods that were under united nations seal until the un inspectors were ejected from the country at the end of 2002.. us intelligence agencies are now trying to determine whether the boast is true or merely another bluff by the reclusive stalinist regime.. either way, the declaration has pushed the us president a step nearer deciding whether to accede to north korea's demand for direct negotiations - and thus drop his previous insistence that he would never bow to "nuclear blackmail" - or to accelerate plans for a military strike against the north's nuclear installations.. that spectre was raised yesterday by william perry, defence secretary under president clinton, when he told the washington post that the bush administration was "losing control" of the situation.. mr perry is a specialist on korea who helped prepare the military action which mr clinton came close to launching against yongbyon and other key north korean sites in 1994. he now fears that the north is not only close to a nuclear test to show the world it is a nuclear power, but also that it could sell a weapon to a terrorist group for use against the us.. "the nuclear programme now under way in north korea poses an imminent danger of nuclear weapons being detonated in american cities," mr perry said, adding that he had reached that conclusion after talks with bush officials in washington, and with senior figures in china and south korea.. china, reckoned to have the greatest leverage over of kim jong il's renegade state, launched a new effort this week to draw the north into regional talks to defuse the crisis, but mr perry told the washington post that as far as he could see, the "diplomatic track is inconsequential" and going nowhere.. the korean crisis has been largely ignored as washington has focused almost exclusively on iraq.
It is really a two-fold problem. The first issue is the fear that NK may produce nukes to give them to terrorist to ship and then detonate here. As far as giving nukes to terrorist organizations, this could eventually be a real threat, America is going to have to figure out some way to guard against this, through 100% container checks or whatever it takes, we need to solve this before it becomes a legitimate problem. We might be able to stop new countries from developing nukes but we will never be able to stop countries from making WMD. Chemical weapons are produced almost exactly like farming pesticides, and Biological weapons can be produced in a small lab with dual use technology. Basically, the key is to develop a defense now. Back to NK, the key to controlling NK and their nuke program is China. China owns these guys and China does not want a bunch of nukes floating around anymore than we do, remember we buy the stuff they make. Lean on China through economic means, the pressure will flow into NK.
The second problem is NK expansionism. This really isn’t as big as a problem as some might think. The only country threatened by NK is SK. They will not attack China, and China will not let them attack Taiwan; they are saving that apple for themselves. The minute NK begins to show expansionist tendencies Japan will have more nukes than you can shake a stick at; even that crazy NK dictator does not want a piece of that. I think American troops should phase out of SK though for two reasons. One, many SKs don’t seem to want us their and two, SK economy is 26 times the size of NK. SK can and should defend itself.
Terry
i will be backing former vermont gov howard dean to run in '04.
my reason: clinton was quoted recently as saying that "strong and wrong always beats weak and right".
i remember during the run up to election in 2000 watching the bush vs. gore debates and thinking..i know gore is smarter but he comes across as weaker in debate.
The idiots on the left have for the last 50 years attempted to show most republican leaders as poorly educated, unwise men. In my life time they did it to Bush Jr., Regan, Ford, and historically they also did it to Lincoln. A higher SAT score (which is used for a measure of an individual’s knowledge base in this country) is indicative that Bush is at least as smart as Gore if not smarter. My point was not murky you just chose not to see it; simply saying Bush is stupid is a childlike argument at best.
Terry
i will be backing former vermont gov howard dean to run in '04.
my reason: clinton was quoted recently as saying that "strong and wrong always beats weak and right".
i remember during the run up to election in 2000 watching the bush vs. gore debates and thinking..i know gore is smarter but he comes across as weaker in debate.
Lieberman (sp?) is the only dem with a snowballs chance in hell. Of course I doubt he will get the nomination because he is considered to centrist by the party core; he was booed out here in the peoples republic of California by the Dems. Of course by 2004 California will probably be in a state of complete anarchy. Thank you gray davis you worthless pile of cat dung; 20 billion surplus to 30 billion in the red, thats got to be a record.
BTW, Bush's SAT scores where higher than Gores. Just for all you that believe the hype that bush is dumb.
Terry
i remember reading many watchtower/awake magazines that stated "there is enough bombs on this planet to blow it up 7 times over.
" (wish i had copies of the quotes/and pictures).. and after watching the scenes in terminator 3 of the earth being desolated by machines.. and after watching the war in afghanistan and iraq and seeing how many bombs the us used in these "small countries" with unreal precision.
i really doubt if it possible to destroy the whole planet, even if they wanted to.
If there was a world wide massive exchange of nukes between all players most probably every human in the northern hemisphere would be dead, dying or sitting in a shelter waiting to starve to death. Its possible some people might survive in areas that are not targeted, like the amazon or places in africa. But of course the global climate changes mean these people would need to quickly adapted to a new life style. It would basically be like 6000 BC all over again.
Terry
it's getting on to almost two years since the events of september 11, and it is striking how little we know about what happened: .
we don't know the real names of any of the hijackers.. we don't know what countries they came from.. we don't know who planned and organized the terrorism.. we don't know who financed it.. we have no idea what actually happened at the pentagon (but i know a boeing 757 didn't go through this hole).
normal video tapes of and from the pentagon building, which should have shown what happened, have never been released (except for one, which poses more questions than it answers).
Honestly, I have been around this board in one form or another since the beginning. I can tell you at this point this board is the worst it has ever been. If this DBS sucked anymore, we would have to make up a new word for its suck like qualities. The phrase completely sucks just does not cover the depth this board has sunk.