The point is that many on the left (but not you) cannot see that their beliefs need improving and may be part of the problem. They aren't too good at self-awareness and self-criticism. ... the left ... The left ...
If you accept that I don't believe those things, can't you stop boxing me in with the deep end of "the left" which does? Some on the crazy spectrum of "the right" are nazis, but if I started making those kinds of generalizations about you as a member of "the right" that wouldn't be productive or nice.
Answer me this: if it was Obama's and NATO's aim to stop Putin annexing Crimea, they failed. Y/N?
I don't understand the question. You are asking if the first round of sanctions (begun early march) failed to stop the Russian annexation (begun February and planned long before that)?
Since you haven't bothered to read about the sanctions, according to the sources I have read they have brought Russian economy on its knees. That provides real leverage over Putin because many powerful people understand that with Putin gone that will free up a lot of money, and all things considered a weak economy is bound to make life more difficult for Putin.
But let me just understand your position:
You believe that when, say, Russia takes a part of Ukraine and continue aggression for two years the best move is no consequences?
When he attack EU countries infrastructure, no consequences?
when he tries to assassinate a head of state of an EU country, no consequences?
If you believe there should be consequences, what should they be? a harshly worded UN resolution?