bohm

Joined

• started 191 topics
• posted 7,847 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by bohm

• 
  9

  Barbie doll is now a JW!!!

  by wolfman85 in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  unbelievable, this is too much!!!.

  .

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  This must be a photoshop
• 
  12

  Is science a tool, or a source of philosophy?

  by EdenOne in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  is science simply a powerful tool, or must it also dictate adherence to strict secularism?.

  science must not impose any philosophy, any more than the telephone must tell us what to say.

  - gilbert keith chesterton.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  Well according to some religions the world is flat, according to science it is not. If we on the other hand consider a philosophers god who made the world just as we observe it there cannot by definition be a contradiction with scientific ontology
• 
  12

  Is science a tool, or a source of philosophy?

  by EdenOne in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  is science simply a powerful tool, or must it also dictate adherence to strict secularism?.

  science must not impose any philosophy, any more than the telephone must tell us what to say.

  - gilbert keith chesterton.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  Do we talk about scientific/religious ontology or epistomology?
• 
  8

  UK KH projection equipment

  by Saltheart Foamfollower in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  as everyone knows, there have been major changes in kh financing recently.

  this means that congs should only have funds equal to 3 months expenditure on hand - send the rest to the borg.

  in the uk there has also been an appeal to send extra funds to finance the new bethel (if we are going to print our own literature and show videos on the doors, why do they need a new bethel?).

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  is the letter specific about where the equipment should be ordered from?
• 
  40

  AGM 2014 Songs

  by wifibandit in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  all thanks must go to my anonymous source.. .

  full set: http://imgur.com/a/bwl52.

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  lol @ data-dog
• 
  1

  by whathehadas in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  .

  .

  1. 
• 

  bohm

  Jehovah does not approve of this empty thread puny human
• 
  55

  October 2nd, 2014: The World Ends Tomorrow, Taking all Bets!

  by Oubliette in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  on october 2, 1914, charles taze russell, founder of the watchtower, announced that the gentile times have ended!.

  tomorrow will be exactly 100 years since his historic announcment.. to commemorate this centennial occasion, i will gladly take bets in any amount of money that the world will not end tomorrow and that on friday, october 3rd, 2014 gmt, we will still all be here, for better or worse.. any die-hard jws interested in taking the other side of this friendly little wager?

  still hoping the big "a" is coming tomorrow and your loving god, jehovah, is going to commit mass genocide and execute 99.9% of earth's population because they don't follow the dictates the 7 members of the "faithful and discreet slave," aka, the governing body of jehovah's witnesses?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  argh jesus is in the sky with a flamin swo..

  sorry it was just a cloud. Did the world come to an end in a more sinfull region yet?
• 
  55

  October 2nd, 2014: The World Ends Tomorrow, Taking all Bets!

  by Oubliette in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  on october 2, 1914, charles taze russell, founder of the watchtower, announced that the gentile times have ended!.

  tomorrow will be exactly 100 years since his historic announcment.. to commemorate this centennial occasion, i will gladly take bets in any amount of money that the world will not end tomorrow and that on friday, october 3rd, 2014 gmt, we will still all be here, for better or worse.. any die-hard jws interested in taking the other side of this friendly little wager?

  still hoping the big "a" is coming tomorrow and your loving god, jehovah, is going to commit mass genocide and execute 99.9% of earth's population because they don't follow the dictates the 7 members of the "faithful and discreet slave," aka, the governing body of jehovah's witnesses?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  I would happily bet you 100 euro, however I already spend them on a scholarship for enzo.
• 
  2

  How do delete my account?

  by awakenyr2004 in

  1. forum
  2. tech-support

  i'd like to start a new account with a different email.

  i just google my email address and my cell number and i found some posts here.. how can i block them or delete my account.

  i have some family on the fence about shunning me and i hate to put the nail in the coffin if they find me here.. .

  1. 
  2. 
• 

  bohm

  Pm simon about the posts you want to have blocked out.
• 
  280

  the flood, mammoths, elphants, and food.

  by Crazyguy in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.

  also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  Caedes: the dialog is like this:

  • Bob: george bush is six feet tall
  • alice no!
  • bob: how tall is he the?
  • alice: you understand nothing. He is not six feet tall
  • bob: this book sayes: "george w bush is six feet tall"
  • alice: you are taking it out of context. You are a joke
  • bob: but how tall do you think he is?
  • (two pages later)
  • alice: his net effective height is six feet
  • bob: ...so you agree?
  • alice: no! You understand nothing!
  • Bob: wth.
  • alice: i win!

  around here bob realise that alice sees george bushs height as being composed by the distance from his toes to waist and from the waist to head, and so she is insisting we should say his net total height is six feet and not just his height is six feet, as if these were different things. I think viviane started out with a genuine disagreement with me four pages back (see the insistence the shell theorem involved two radiuses), but she realised this was not a good point and so settled for the above tiresome discussion.

  Returning to the effective grav field vs just the grav field. I think we agree this is entirely about semantics at this point, which is not to say i am changing my mind. However here is a point to consider wrt the hollow sphere: if we use the term effective field, what does that mean? My intuitive notion is we might call it the effective field because it is a superposition of smaller "true" fields, however what are those fields? The system only consists of a spherical mass density, and so any insistence on a true division into finitely many "true" fields that are non-zero is both arbitrary and false. for this reason i think the word "effective" should be considered to have roughly the same status as another qualifier like "large", and i suggest this may be a reason it is avoided in a context where exactness matters like in the book cosmology. This may be reading to much into the text though.

  Comparing the situation to electrostatics the situation here is simpler: we could say the electric field is that due to a single electron, and the effective field is then the superposition of many simpler fields. This is simpler and more sensible, however i am sure your three friends often use the word "electric field" to describe the field of something more than a single electron!

  the point i return to is this: if we insist the use of "the gravitational field" is physically wrong, and not just a semantic difference, we need to endow the words "the gravitational field" and "effective grav field " with a specific meaning. I just cant tell what that should be in this context. If your friends have a suggestion i would be happy to hear it. Cheers.