The retrofit of the '70 weeks' 'prophecy' to supposedly point to Jesus is a later Christian forgery. Their premise for shifting the reigns of Xerxes and Artaxerxes is therefore redundant.
Yes, this chronology is intended to pinpoint the; "going forth of the word to rebuild Jerusalem".
I suggest that this chronology is so far off that contending over these before Christ dates (BCE) dates is entirely redundant.
The going forth of the word to rebuild Jerusalem happened in the first Century!
You may not believe me however, perhaps you should give some credibility to the Apostles who seemed completely aware of this:
Acts 15:12-18
After they quit speaking, James answered, saying: "Men, brothers, hear me. 14 Sym´e·on has related thoroughly how God for the first time turned his attention to the nations to take out of them a people for his name. 15 And with this the words of the Prophets agree, just as it is written, 16 ‘After these things I shall return and rebuild the booth of David that is fallen down; and I shall rebuild its ruins and erect it again, 17 in order that those who remain of the men may earnestly seek Jehovah, together with people of all the nations, people who are called by my name, says Jehovah, who is doing these things, 18 known from of old.’
The Apostles came to terms with the fact that the "rebuilding prophecy" had just recently begun its fulfillment in the 1st Century!
Why can the Watchtower Society and everyone else not come to terms with something very straightforward and plainly written in the bible?
abe