Thank you for instructing me to get my facts right. I wasn't aware I hadn't, and am still not aware I hadn't.
Maria, as a matter of fact, was granted a "divorce a mensa et thoro" by Court order in 1908 (literally, a divorce from bed and board).
So, she got what she wanted - to be rid off Russell and to obtain a generous amount of money.
And she had filed for that separation in 1903.
So I was totally right that she obtained what she wanted.
You are presumptuous with your claims of error or inaccuracy on my part.
Maroa evidently had no interest in remarriage, and that's the only practical difference between this and what you call a "full" divorce, to which I had not referred.
That she placed flowers on his grave - as you say - is irrelevant. If I was her, I'd have attended too (in which case flowers would have been mandatory - 98 years ago, to do otherwise would have been unthinkable), to make sure the evil swine really was dead and this wasn't another of his endless scams.
On your first post in this forum, a year back, you referred to
[your] religious community
http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/watchtower/beliefs/250868/1/INTOLERANCE
What religious community would that be, please? Or was it just the general hypocrisy of religions that you meant to refer to?
The Russell-apologetic slant that some might put on your posts (I'm reasonably confident you are simply concerned about truth - which is fine by me, of course) you make remind me - only vaguely - of that of a very robust member of the Dawn Light Association, who posted for years on Usenet under the handle ResLight.
I know you are not him or connected to him - this is purely about the "I believe all that Russell claimed and disbelieve what the huge horde of detractors claimed" POV.
Yes, I heard all this rubbish before and demolished all this rubbish before. The man, whose name was Day, lived in eternal Night as far as recognised Russell for what we was. He still called him "The Master", lol. He's still defending Russell online today.
He too hated Rutherford venomously. As do many others, I should add, and with good reason.
Russellites, IBSA-ites, Dawn Lights and Thought-Lites are still about well into the twenty-first centuries, which I find hilarious given the blunderings and deceit by Russell... proven beyond any shadow of a doubt - about how the world was going to end well before the end of the nineteenth century!
The reason I'm asking this to detect if there's any source of possible bias on your side. On my side, I have read The Studies in Scripture (yes! I'm a masochist) and have utter intellectual contempt for Russell, and see through his verbiage very clearly. Including his repackaging of old material - his job was selling magazines and books, at the end of the millennial day.
I'm pretty sure there isn't any pro-Russell sentiments on your part, but it saves time if you are explicit. I really don't have time to waste arguing with someone who believes Russell was a good guy - they are too far mentally "gone" to be worth the effort.
And, re your bold claim to me above that:
These stories about C.T. Russell have been more or less known by the "apostate" communnity around this forum
I am still waiting for you to provide any weblink pointing to even a single discussion about the specific (cemetery) scandal which is the only one I have provided evidence for in this thread.
Or, to retract.
Which is it?
[Edited to add: I've just seen you added a link to http://jwdivorces.bravehost.com/russell.html to your last post. Well, no Russellite would dream of doing that, so we'll skip any questions on that front, lol]
__
Focus
("Plague" Class)