@ Redvip
"Since these numbers are compiled internally we will never know, even though there is no reason or evidence to think they are being dishonest. What we have seen in the past is a shuffling game with the numbers and the way they are counted as to appear more than what they are.
Any elder or MS exposed to how the secretary of the cong. "massages" the numbers will know that they are not really being honest. And, since these numbers are a reflection of what the congregations sends, they are not very accurate.
"Also the peak publisher numbers is a good example of how they work the count to make them seem bigger."
Yeah, tryin to make appear something bigger than what it is in not very honest.