OK, Derrick, so, I read your response, carefully, more than once. I guess you were trying to present a context for your answer, and I was patient with that, and even appreciated it. However, since the question here is a very specific one -- Does the Organization Teach that All Non-Witnesses Will Die at Armageddon? -- I'm going to end up ignoring a lot of the context you spent so much time establishing. It isn't because I think what you wrote is stupid, but rather, because most of what you wrote has little to do with the question you were answering.
Remember what you wrote a couple of posts ago, which got all this started (for me, anyway)?
The current Watchtower leadership IMO has engaged in manipulation of words on this teaching to keep the rank and file in line, WITHOUT actually teaching that non-JWs will be exterminated.
You are simply WRONG that the official teaching of JWs is that only JWs will survive Armageddon.
My reply, as you know, was to transcribe a series of quotes contradicting your assertions. So far as I can tell, you've done an about-face in your latest reply:
Layer after layer of sincere albeit twisted reasoning follows to the point where they're convinced that anyone outside this supposed one and only "God's organization" are outside for a reason. They honestly believe ... that those outside of the organization might appear to be righteous and sincere when God knows they are not. Therefore those in the Watchtower's higher eschelon harbor an admittedly warped view that the majority of mankind are unrighteous people living under the guise of being good people. This is based on the incorrect scriptural view that God will not save people who are willing to live law-abiding ordinary lives but simply don't love Him or don't want to make any sacrifices for Him.
Aren't you now admitting that the Watchtower teaches that those outside the Organization are unrighteous and therefore marked for death? It sure seems like you are!
Everything else you write, more or less, is your own opinion -- and, however lovely those opinions may be, they have nothing to do with matters of religious doctrine. For example:
I believe that God figures that good people will take what they need from the message of JWs and discard the rest. While the Watchtower is loathe to this concept it is nonetheless being used by Jehovah.
I don't have a problem with you believing this -- it's your right and all that -- though I personally consider it a pretty absurd idea. But so what? None of this answers our question about the Organization's doctrine. Do they teach mass genocide or not? Yes or no?
Your argument, it seems to me, is that the Organization gets some of God's will done without really understanding how wrong it sometimes is. Well, okay, if you believe that, fine. However, even if your claim could be substantiated, it doesn't change the verifiable fact that (once again) the Organization considers all non-Witnesses unrighteous and marked for death.
This analogy was pretty nifty:
Instead of it being an evil "Borg"-like organization run by manipulative religious con-artists its fundamental motives are quite the opposite. Like the mentally and emotionally disturbed child who is willing to do ANYTHING to please the parents, and grossly misinterprets anything the parents say (i.e., the parents say "Johnny, I don't care what you do, but make your younger brother stop crying!" meaning "Johnny, will you try to play with your brother and keep him occupied while we visit with guests in the livingroom?" -- Johnny takes their words to do "anything" to stop the infant from crying. All else failing, Johnny drowns the infant in the bathtub and it ceases to cry.)
So, instead of being a group of manipulative con artists, the Organization is a group of psychopathic, emotionally disturbed homicidal maniacs with the reasoning capacities of mentally incompetent children! Wow! In any case, the reason why the Organization teaches that 99.9 percent of mankind will die is irrelevant -- the original claim made by you was that they didn't teach it at all.
Anyway, Derrick, I'm glad you responded, and if I've misunderstood, well, do go ahead and explain how. It would seem you've contradicted yourself, though, and your mental perambulating is sometimes, um, a bit irrelevant to the specific topic in question, though pleasant enough to read.
Warm fuzzies,
Dedalus